Literature DB >> 21197215

Amphibians as research models for regenerative medicine.

Fengyu Song1, Bingbing Li, David L Stocum.   

Abstract

The ability to regenerate bone across a critical size defect would be a marked clinical advance over current methods for dealing with such structural gaps. Here, we briefly review the development of limb bones and the mandible, the regeneration of urodele limbs after amputation, and present evidence that urodele and anuran amphibians represent a valuable research model for the study of segment defect regeneration in both limb bones and mandible.

Keywords:  critical size defect; endochondral bone; frog; growth factors; intramembranous bone; limb regeneration; salamander; scaffolds

Mesh：

Year:  2010        PMID： 21197215      PMCID： PMC2946045          DOI： 10.4161/org.6.3.12039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Organogenesis        ISSN： 1547-6278            Impact factor:   2.500


  62 in total

1.  The roles of injury, nerves, and the wound epidermis during the initiation of amphibian limb regeneration.

Authors:  R A Tassava; A L Mescher
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  1975-09-02       Impact factor: 3.880

2.  Denervation effects on DNA replication and mitosis during the initiation of limb regeneration in adult newts.

Authors:  A L Mescher; R A Tassava
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 3.  Deciphering skeletal patterning: clues from the limb.

Authors:  Francesca V Mariani; Gail R Martin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Regeneration in lower jaws of newts after excision of the intermandibular regions.

Authors:  R J GOSS; M W STAGG
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1958-02

5.  Effects on adult newt limb regeneration of partial and complete skin flaps over the amputation surface.

Authors:  A L Mescher
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1976-01

6.  The newt ortholog of CD59 is implicated in proximodistal identity during amphibian limb regeneration.

Authors:  Sara Morais da Silva; Phillip B Gates; Jeremy P Brockes
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.270

7.  Extent of ossification at the amputation plane is correlated with the decline of blastema formation and regeneration in Xenopus laevis hindlimbs.

Authors:  A D Wolfe; H L Nye; J A Cameron
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.780

8.  The mouse short ear skeletal morphogenesis locus is associated with defects in a bone morphogenetic member of the TGF beta superfamily.

Authors:  D M Kingsley; A E Bland; J M Grubber; P C Marker; L B Russell; N G Copeland; N A Jenkins
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-10-30       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Sox9 is required for cartilage formation.

Authors:  W Bi; J M Deng; Z Zhang; R R Behringer; B de Crombrugghe
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Transcriptional profiling of bone regeneration. Insight into the molecular complexity of wound repair.

Authors:  Michael Hadjiargyrou; Frank Lombardo; Shanchuan Zhao; William Ahrens; Jungnam Joo; Hongshik Ahn; Mark Jurman; David W White; Clinton T Rubin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-06-07       Impact factor: 5.157
View more
  10 in total

1.  Engineering towards functional tissues and organs.

Authors:  Suwan N Jayasinghe
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2010 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Preventing Scars after Injury with Partial Irreversible Electroporation.

Authors:  Alexander Golberg; Martin Villiger; Saiqa Khan; Kyle P Quinn; William C Y Lo; Brett E Bouma; Martin C Mihm; William G Austen; Martin L Yarmush
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 8.551

3.  Compensatory regulation of the size of the inner ear in response to excess induction of otic progenitors by fibroblast growth factor signaling.

Authors:  Jian Zhang; Kevin D Wright; Amanda A Mahoney Rogers; Molly M Barrett; Katherine Shim
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.780

Review 4.  Tuning cell fate: from insights to vertebrate regeneration.

Authors:  Daisuke Kami; Satoshi Gojo
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  Skin regeneration with all accessory organs following ablation with irreversible electroporation.

Authors:  Alexander Golberg; Martin Villiger; G Felix Broelsch; Kyle P Quinn; Hassan Albadawi; Saiqa Khan; Michael T Watkins; Irene Georgakoudi; William G Austen; Marianna Bei; Brett E Bouma; Martin C Mihm; Martin L Yarmush
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.963

6.  Subtractive screen of potential limb regeneration related genes from Pachytriton brevipes.

Authors:  Dan Jiang; Xiao-Long Zhu; Jun-Fang Zhao; Yan-Kuan Zhou; Chao Zhong; Ji Zhang; Xiao Huang
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 2.316

7.  The specialist in regeneration-the Axolotl-a suitable model to study bone healing?

Authors:  A Polikarpova; A Ellinghaus; O Schmidt-Bleek; L Grosser; C H Bucher; G N Duda; E M Tanaka; K Schmidt-Bleek
Journal:  NPJ Regen Med       Date:  2022-06-30

8.  Non-thermal, pulsed electric field cell ablation: A novel tool for regenerative medicine and scarless skin regeneration.

Authors:  Alexander Golberg; G Felix Broelsch; Stefan Bohr; Martin C Mihm; William G Austen; Hassan Albadawi; Michael T Watkins; Martin L Yarmush
Journal:  Technology (Singap World Sci)       Date:  2013-09

Review 9.  Looking Ahead to Engineering Epimorphic Regeneration of a Human Digit or Limb.

Authors:  Lina M Quijano; Kristen M Lynch; Christopher H Allan; Stephen F Badylak; Tabassum Ahsan
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 6.389

10.  The Axolotl Fibula as a Model for the Induction of Regeneration across Large Segment Defects in Long Bones of the Extremities.

Authors:  Xiaoping Chen; Fengyu Song; Deepali Jhamb; Jiliang Li; Marco C Bottino; Mathew J Palakal; David L Stocum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.