| Literature DB >> 21197077 |
Elizabeth Nava-Aguilera1, Yolanda López-Vidal, Eva Harris, Arcadio Morales-Pérez, Steven Mitchell, Miguel Flores-Moreno, Ascencio Villegas-Arrizón, José Legorreta-Soberanis, Robert Ledogar, Neil Andersson.
Abstract
Recurrence and reinfection of tuberculosis have quite different implications for prevention. We identified 267 spoligotypes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from consecutive tuberculosis patients in Acapulco, Mexico, to assess the level of clustering and risk factors for clustered strains. Point cluster analysis examined spatial clustering. Risk analysis relied on the Mantel Haenszel procedure to examine bivariate associations, then to develop risk profiles of combinations of risk factors. Supplementary analysis of the spoligotyping data used SpolTools. Spoligotyping identified 85 types, 50 of them previously unreported. The five most common spoligotypes accounted for 55% of tuberculosis cases. One cluster of 70 patients (26% of the series) produced a single spoligotype from the Manila Family (Clade EAI2). The high proportion (78%) of patients infected with cluster strains is compatible with recent transmission of TB in Acapulco. Geomatic analysis showed no spatial clustering; clustering was associated with a risk profile of uneducated cases who lived in single-room dwellings. The Manila emerging strain accounted for one in every four cases, confirming that one strain can predominate in a hyperendemic area.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21197077 PMCID: PMC3004385 DOI: 10.1155/2011/408375
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Dev Immunol ISSN: 1740-2522
Acapulco patterns of Mycobacterium tuberculosis spoligotypes.
|
|
SIT, designation of the spoligotype in the international database. Spoligotyping patterns, binary description: (■) hybridization and (□) no hybridization. n, number of strains; clade, defined mainly as described [4, 5]: EAI-2/Manila: East African Indian 2/Manila, T (ill-defined T cluster), LAM: Latin American and Mediterranean, S: S clade, MANU: Manu family, H: Haarlem, U: Undesignated, X: X cluster, Bovis. New clusters designated as MX (Mexican).
Emerging strains detected in the pulmonary TB by using spoligotypes in Acapulco.
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.95 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.01 | ||||
| Strain | q value | Strain | q value | Strain | q value | Strain | q value |
|
| |||||||
| S19 | 0.00000000 | S19 | 0.00000006 | S19 | 0.00000477 | S19 | 0.00001087 |
| S8 | 0.03205437 | S8 | 0.08223924 | S8 | 0.17184278 | S8 | 0.20014382 |
f = sampling fraction.
Figure 1Spoligoforest of tuberculosis cases in Acapulco, Mexico. Nodes are labeled with the ST identifier as indicated in SoplDB4 [3], with the cluster size enclosed in parentheses. Spoligotype not in SpolDB4 was labeled as “Mx” with a number. The size of each node increases as a function of the number of isolates (size of the cluster); the lines among the nodes reflect the evolutionary relationships among spoligotypes with arrows that denote the descendent. If the weight of the line was equal to 1, we drew a solid line; if the weight was greater than or equal to 0.5 but less than 1, we used a dashed line; if the weight was less than 0.5, we used a dotted line.
Characteristics of the pulmonary TB case series in Acapulco.
| Variable |
| % |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Male | 190 | 63.3 |
| Female | 110 | 36.7 |
|
| ||
| 15–24 | 51 | 17 |
| 26–34 | 72 | 24 |
| 35–44 | 58 | 19.3 |
| 45–54 | 55 | 18.3 |
| 55–64 | 40 | 13.3 |
| 65 + | 24 | 8 |
|
| ||
| Duration of the cough >3 months** | 192 | 64 |
| Lost weight** | 271 | 90.3 |
| Fever** | 227 | 75.7 |
| Hemoptysis** | 151 | 50.3 |
| Associated illness** | 132 | 44 |
|
| ||
| Diabetes | 77 | 58.3 |
| Drug user | 20 | 15.2 |
| AIDS | 12 | 9.1 |
| Alcoholism | 7 | 5.3 |
| Undernutrition | 3 | 2.3 |
| Others | 13 | 9.8 |
|
| 26 | 8.7 |
|
| 22 | 11.6 |
|
| ||
| Yes | 112 | 37.3 |
| No | 150 | 50 |
| Do not know | 37 | 12.3 |
|
| 27 | 9 |
|
| ||
| Náhuatl | 16 | 59.3 |
| Mixteco | 9 | 33.3 |
| Amuzgo | 2 | 7.4 |
|
| ||
| Guerrero | 272 | 90.7 |
| Oaxaca | 11 | 3.7 |
| Estado de México | 4 | 1.3 |
| Michoacán | 3 | 1 |
| Other state | 10 | 3.3 |
|
| ||
| Acapulco | 150 | 55.1 |
| Zone Centro | 25 | 9.2 |
| La Montaña | 7 | 2.6 |
| Costa Chica | 46 | 16.9 |
| Costa Grande | 21 | 7.7 |
| Zone Norte | 8 | 2.9 |
| Tierra Caliente | 12 | 4.4 |
*P value =.05,
**P value <.05.
Characteristics of the largest clusters detected by spoligotyping in Acapulco.
| No. | Cluster size | Age | Place of | Indigenous | Associated | Immune- | Previous | Contact/ | Husband/ | BAAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 70 (45) | 41.6 | Guerrero (62) | Nah (4) | 43% (30) | Diabetes (17) | 10% (7) | 39% (27) | 8% (5) | + 47 |
|
| ||||||||||
| 2 | 31 (21) | 41.2 | Guerrero (28) | Nah (2) | 45% (14) | Diabetes (10) | 13% (4) | 26% (8) | 17% (5) | + 36 |
|
| ||||||||||
| 3 | 22 (19) | 44.0 | Guerrero (20) | Nah (3) | 27% (6) | Diabetes (4) | 14% (3) | 41% (9) | 0 | ++ 36 |
|
| ||||||||||
| 4 | 15 (7) | 45.4 | Guerrero (13) | Nah (1) | 60% (9) | Diabetes (3) | 0 | 53% (8) | 0 | + 33 |
|
| ||||||||||
| 5 | 8 (4) | 43.6 | Guerrero (8) | Mix (2) | 50% (4) | Diabetes (1) | 0 | 63% (5) | 0 | + 12.5 |
Place of birth: DF= Federal district, Mexico; Gto= Guanajuato state, EdoMex= State of México. Indigenous group: Nah= Náhuatl, Mix= Mixteco.
Figure 2Geographical distribution of tuberculosis cases in Acapulco, Mexico. Mapping and georeferencing of tuberculosis cases used a scale of 1 : 50000. Point cluster analysis relied on the IDRISI QUADRAT module. The variance/mean ratio significantly smaller than 1.0 suggests a regular distribution, while values greater than 1.0 suggest spatial clustering.
Bivariate analysis of conventional TB risk factors, contrasting clustered and nonclustered cases.
| Variable | Clustered | Not clustered | OR | 95% CI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % |
| % | ||||
| Sex | Male | 135 | 80.6 | 32 | 19.4 | 1.60 | 0.87–2.2 |
| Female | 72 | 72.7 | 27 | 27.3 | 1 | ||
| Age | <30 years | 55 | 76.4 | 17 | 23.6 | 0.91 | 0.48–1.72 |
| ≥30 years | 150 | 78.1 | 42 | 21.9 | 1 | ||
| Marital status | Single | 65 | 83.3 | 13 | 16.4 | 1.64 | 0.83–3.2 |
| Married | 140 | 75.3 | 46 | 24.7 | 1 | ||
| Education | No formal studies | 39 | 72.2 | 15 | 27.8 | 0.67 | 0.34–1.33 |
| Formal study | 166 | 79.4 | 43 | 20.6 | 1 | ||
| Occupation | Unemployed | 70 | 74.5 | 24 | 25.5 | 0.76 | 0.40–1.43 |
| Employed | 135 | 79.4 | 35 | 20.6 | 1 | ||
| Ethnicity | Indigenous | 19 | 73.1 | 7 | 26.9 | 0.75 | 0.28–2.08 |
| Mestizo | 189 | 78.4 | 52 | 21.6 | 1 | ||
| Migration | Yes | 99 | 76.2 | 31 | 23.8 | 0.82 | 0.45–1.47 |
| No | 105 | 79.5 | 27 | 20.5 | 1 | ||
| Area of residence | Urban | 153 | 78.5 | 42 | 21.5 | 1.19 | 0.59–2.37 |
| Rural | 52 | 75.4 | 17 | 24.6 | 1 | ||
| Duration of residence | ≥17 years | 123 | 79.4 | 32 | 20.6 | 1.09 | 0.59–2.0 |
| <17 years | 74 | 77.9 | 21 | 22.1 | 1 | ||
| Number of residents per household | ≥6 persons | 70 | 72.9 | 26 | 27.1 | 0.66 | 0.37–1.19 |
| <6 persons | 135 | 80.4 | 33 | 16.6 | 1 | ||
| Use of alcohol | Yes | 67 | 75.3 | 22 | 24.7 | 0.82 | 0.45–1.50 |
| No | 137 | 78.7 | 37 | 21.3 | 1 | ||
| Concomitant illness | Yes | 94 | 77.7 | 27 | 23.3 | 1.02 | 0.55–1.91 |
| No | 111 | 77.6 | 32 | 23.4 | 1 | ||
| Spouse with TB | Yes | 15 | 71.4 | 6 | 28.6 | 0.66 | 0.24–1.85 |
| No | 113 | 79.0 | 30 | 21.0 | 1 | ||
Bivariate analysis of risk profiles associated with clustering.
| Variable | Cluster | No cluster | OR | 95% CI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % |
| % | ||||
| Among cases who used alcohol | Male | 71 | 85.5 | 12 | 14.5 | 2.1 | 1.05–4.03 |
| Female | 68 | 73.1 | 25 | 26.9 | 1 | ||
| Among cases over the age of 29 years | Single | 36 | 92.3 | 3 | 7.7 | 4.1 | 1.29–13.1 |
| Married or cohabiting | 114 | 74.5 | 39 | 23.5 | 1 | ||
| Among cases single/unmarried cases | Unemployed | 7 | 87.5 | 1 | 12.5 | 13.7 | 1.81–104 |
| Employed | 8 | 40.0 | 12 | 60.0 | 1 | ||
| Among cases with remunerated employment | Mestizo | 132 | 81.0 | 31 | 19.0 | 3.2 | 1.07–9.1 |
| Indigenous | 8 | 57.1 | 6 | 42.9 | 1 | ||
| Among cases who live in one place for less than 15 years | Urban | 66 | 78.6 | 18 | 21.4 | 3.0 | 1.22–10.0 |
| Rural | 11 | 55.0 | 9 | 45.0 | 1 | ||
| Cases younger than 30 years of age | Urban | 43 | 82.7 | 9 | 17.3 | 3.2 | 1.03–9.82 |
| Rural | 12 | 60.0 | 8 | 40.0 | 1 | ||
| Among cases without formal education | 1 room | 22 | 91.7 | 2 | 8.3 | 8.9 | 2.0–39.1 |
| 2 or more rooms | 16 | 55.2 | 13 | 44.8 | 1 | ||
OR= Odds Ratio, CI= Confidence Interval.