Literature DB >> 21196788

Use of causal language in observational studies of obesity and nutrition.

Stacey S Cofield1, Rachel V Corona, David B Allison.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the inappropriate use of causal language in studies on obesity and nutrition.
METHODS: Titles and abstracts of 525 peer-reviewed papers in the 4 leading journals in the fields of obesity and nutrition were scrutinized for language implying causality in observational studies published in 2006.
RESULTS: Such misleading language appeared in 161 papers (31%) independent of funding source. Remarkably 49% of studies lacking statistically significant primary outcomes used misleading language compared to 29% of those with p values ≤0.05 (chi square p < 0.001). Exculpatory language was present in the body of the text in 19%; of the 161 studies.
CONCLUSION: We suggest that editors and reviewers evaluate submissions for misleading reporting.
Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21196788      PMCID: PMC3280017          DOI: 10.1159/000322940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Facts        ISSN: 1662-4025            Impact factor:   3.942


  5 in total

1.  Checking the pulse: Midwestern reporters' opinions on their ability to report health care news.

Authors:  Melinda Voss
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Industry influence on occupational and environmental public health.

Authors:  James Huff
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007 Jan-Mar

Review 3.  Industry funding and the reporting quality of large long-term weight loss trials.

Authors:  O Thomas; L Thabane; J Douketis; R Chu; A O Westfall; D B Allison
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 5.095

4.  Relationship between funding source and conclusion among nutrition-related scientific articles.

Authors:  Lenard I Lesser; Cara B Ebbeling; Merrill Goozner; David Wypij; David S Ludwig
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 5.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Authors:  Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 11.069

  5 in total
  16 in total

1.  Contents of this issue.

Authors:  Johannes Hebebrand
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.942

2.  Commentary on Disparities in Infant Mortality Due to Congenital Anomalies on Guam.

Authors:  Jameson D Voss; Roger A Erich; Pauline M Lucas; Danny C Dacey; Carol C Walters; James R Poel
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2016-09

3.  Issues with data and analyses: Errors, underlying themes, and potential solutions.

Authors:  Andrew W Brown; Kathryn A Kaiser; David B Allison
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Will reducing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption reduce obesity? Evidence supporting conjecture is strong, but evidence when testing effect is weak.

Authors:  K A Kaiser; J M Shikany; K D Keating; D B Allison
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 9.213

5.  Observational research rigour alone does not justify causal inference.

Authors:  Keisuke Ejima; Peng Li; Daniel L Smith; Tim R Nagy; Inga Kadish; Thomas van Groen; John A Dawson; Yongbin Yang; Amit Patki; David B Allison
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 4.686

6.  Toward more rigorous and informative nutritional epidemiology: The rational space between dismissal and defense of the status quo.

Authors:  Andrew W Brown; Stella Aslibekyan; Dennis Bier; Rafael Ferreira da Silva; Adam Hoover; David M Klurfeld; Eric Loken; Evan Mayo-Wilson; Nir Menachemi; Greg Pavela; Dale Schoeller; Colby J Vorland; Leah D Whigham; David B Allison
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 11.208

7.  Misuse of odds ratios in obesity literature: an empirical analysis of published studies.

Authors:  Gabriel S Tajeu; Bisakha Sen; David B Allison; Nir Menachemi
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 5.002

8.  Classification and prevalence of spin in abstracts of non-randomized studies evaluating an intervention.

Authors:  Clément Lazarus; Romana Haneef; Philippe Ravaud; Isabelle Boutron
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Interpretation of Results of Studies Evaluating an Intervention Highlighted in Google Health News: A Cross-Sectional Study of News.

Authors:  Romana Haneef; Clement Lazarus; Philippe Ravaud; Amélie Yavchitz; Isabelle Boutron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Goals in Nutrition Science 2015-2020.

Authors:  David B Allison; Josep Bassaganya-Riera; Barbara Burlingame; Andrew W Brown; Johannes le Coutre; Suzanne L Dickson; Willem van Eden; Johan Garssen; Raquel Hontecillas; Chor San H Khoo; Dietrich Knorr; Martin Kussmann; Pierre J Magistretti; Tapan Mehta; Adrian Meule; Michael Rychlik; Claus Vögele
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2015-09-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.