Literature DB >> 21196562

Patient to nurse ratio and risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients.

Stijn I Blot1, Mireia Llaurado Serra, Despoina Koulenti, Thiago Lisboa, Maria Deja, Pavlos Myrianthefs, Emilpaolo Manno, Emili Diaz, Arzu Topeli, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Jordi Rello.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine how the patient to nurse ratio affects risk for ventilator-associated pneumonia.
METHODS: Data from an earlier study in 27 intensive care units in 9 European countries were examined in a secondary analysis. The initial cohort included 2585 consecutive patients who had mechanical ventilation (1) after admission for treatment of pneumonia or (2) for more than 48 hours irrespective of the diagnosis at admission. In units with variable staffing levels, the highest patient to nurse ratio in a 24-hour period was considered. Patients from 6 units that did not provide data on nurse staffing levels were excluded from the analysis.
RESULTS: Ventilator-associated pneumonia developed in 393 of the 1658 patients (23.7%) in the secondary cohort. In units with patient to nurse ratios of 1 to 1, 2 to 1, 2.5 to 1, and 3 to 1, rates were 9.3%, 25.7%, 18.7%, and 24.2%, respectively (P = .003). Rates were significantly lower (P = .002) in units with a ratio of 1 to 1 (9.3%) than in units with a ratio of more than 1 patient to 1 nurse (24.4%). After adjustments for confounding covariates, ratios of more than 1 patient to 1 nurse were no longer associated with increased risk for ventilator-associated pneumonia.
CONCLUSIONS: A patient to nurse ratio of 1 to 1 appears to be associated with a lower risk for ventilator-associated pneumonia, but after adjustments for confounding covariates, the difference is not significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21196562     DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2011555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Crit Care        ISSN: 1062-3264            Impact factor:   2.228


  9 in total

1.  How bedside feedback improves head-of-bed angle compliance for intubated patients.

Authors:  Geb W Thomas
Journal:  IISE Trans Healthc Syst Eng       Date:  2017-05-08

Review 2.  Nosocomial pneumonia in 27 ICUs in Europe: perspectives from the EU-VAP/CAP study.

Authors:  D Koulenti; E Tsigou; J Rello
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Major sources of critical incidents in intensive care.

Authors:  Ingeborg D Welters; James Gibson; Martin Mogk; Richard Wenstone
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Improving patient safety by optimizing the use of nursing human resources.

Authors:  Christian M Rochefort; David L Buckeridge; Michal Abrahamowicz
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Current status of intensive care units registered as critical care subspecialty training hospitals in Korea.

Authors:  Sang-Hyun Kwak; Cheol-Won Jeong; Seong-Heon Lee; Hyun-Jeong Lee; Younsuck Koh
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Staffing patterns of respiratory therapists in critical care units of Canadian teaching hospitals.

Authors:  Andrew J West; Jason Nickerson; Gene Breau; Puck Mai; Christina Dolgowicz
Journal:  Can J Respir Ther       Date:  2016-09-01

7.  Exploring the Nursing Factors Related to Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Yanling Yin; Meirong Sun; Zhe Li; Jingjing Bu; Yuhong Chen; Kun Zhang; Zhenjie Hu
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-04-06

Review 8.  Nursing care factors influencing patients' outcomes in the intensive care unit: Findings from a rapid review.

Authors:  Matteo Danielis; Anne Lucia Leona Destrebecq; Stefano Terzoni; Alvisa Palese
Journal:  Int J Nurs Pract       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 2.226

9.  An Emergency Amendment to the National Scope of Practice for Paramedics in the Setting of a Global Pandemic.

Authors:  Brad Boehringer; Peter O'Meara; Gary Wingrove; Nikiah G Nudell
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 5.667

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.