Literature DB >> 21196510

How attention and contrast gain control interact to regulate lightness contrast and assimilation: a computational neural model.

Michael E Rudd1.   

Abstract

Recent theories of lightness perception assume that lightness (perceived reflectance) is computed by a process that contrasts the target's luminance with that of one or more regions in its spatial surround. A challenge for any such theory is the phenomenon of lightness assimilation, which occurs when increasing the luminance of a surround region increases the target lightness: the opposite of contrast. Here contrast and assimilation are studied quantitatively in lightness matching experiments utilizing concentric disk-and-ring displays. Whether contrast or assimilation is seen depends on a number of factors including: the luminance relations of the target, surround, and background; surround size; and matching instructions. When assimilation occurs, it is always part of a larger pattern in which assimilation and contrast both occur over different ranges of surround luminance. These findings are quantitatively modeled by a theory that assumes lightness is computed from a weighted sum of responses of edge detector neurons in visual cortex. The magnitude of the neural response to an edge is regulated by a combination of contrast gain control acting between neighboring edge detectors and a top-down attentional gain control that selectively weights the response to stimulus edges according to their task relevance.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21196510     DOI: 10.1167/10.14.40

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  16 in total

1.  Comments and responses to "Theoretical approaches to lightness and perception".

Authors:  Barbara Blakeslee; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Contrast magnitude and polarity effects on color filling-in along cardinal color axes.

Authors:  Xiaohua Zhuang; Dingcai Cao
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The nature of instructional effects in color constancy.

Authors:  Ana Radonjić; David H Brainard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Brightness induction magnitude declines with increasing distance from the inducing field edge.

Authors:  Barbara Blakeslee; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Lightness Constancy in Surface Visualization.

Authors:  Danielle Albers Szafir; Alper Sarikaya; Michael Gleicher
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 4.579

6.  A Neurocomputational account of the role of contour facilitation in brightness perception.

Authors:  Dražen Domijan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  What visual illusions tell us about underlying neural mechanisms and observer strategies for tackling the inverse problem of achromatic perception.

Authors:  Barbara Blakeslee; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Depth effect on lightness revisited: The role of articulation, proximity and fields of illumination.

Authors:  Ana Radonjić; Alan L Gilchrist
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-08-14

9.  A cortical edge-integration model of object-based lightness computation that explains effects of spatial context and individual differences.

Authors:  Michael E Rudd
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  From image processing to computational neuroscience: a neural model based on histogram equalization.

Authors:  Marcelo Bertalmío
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.