Literature DB >> 21195494

Do bad report cards have consequences? Impacts of publicly reported provider quality information on the CABG market in Pennsylvania.

Justin Wang1, Jason Hockenberry, Shin-Yi Chou, Muzhe Yang.   

Abstract

Since 1992, the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council (PHC4) has published cardiac care report cards for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery providers. We examine the impact of CABG report cards on a provider's aggregate volume and volume by patient severity and then employ a mixed logit model to investigate the matching between patients and providers. We find a reduction in volume of poor performing and unrated surgeons' volume but no effect on more highly rated surgeons or hospitals of any rating. We also find that the probability that patients, regardless of severity of illness, receive CABG surgery from low-performing surgeons is significantly lower. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21195494     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.883


  16 in total

Review 1.  Elements of Program Design in Medicare's Value-based and Alternative Payment Models: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Karen E Joynt Maddox; Aditi P Sen; Lok Wong Samson; Rachael B Zuckerman; Nancy DeLew; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  A framework for guiding efforts to reward value instead of volume.

Authors:  Taylor J Christensen
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2015-11-07

3.  Public reporting and the evolution of diabetes quality.

Authors:  Jeffrey S McCullough; Daniel J Crespin; Jean M Abraham; Jon B Christianson; Michael Finch
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2015-03-06

4.  The impact of tiered physician networks on patient choices.

Authors:  Anna D Sinaiko; Meredith B Rosenthal
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  The impact of profitability of hospital admissions on mortality.

Authors:  Richard C Lindrooth; R Tamara Konetzka; Amol S Navathe; Jingsan Zhu; Wei Chen; Kevin Volpp
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.734

6.  Quality-based ratings in Medicare and trends in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Mariétou H Ouayogodé
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.734

7.  Is great information good enough? Evidence from physicians as patients.

Authors:  Michael Frakes; Jonathan Gruber; Anupam Jena
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.804

8.  Comparative performance information plays no role in the referral behaviour of GPs.

Authors:  Nicole A B M Ketelaar; Marjan J Faber; Glyn Elwyn; Gert P Westert; Jozé C Braspenning
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Who is watching the watchmen: Is quality reporting ever harmful?

Authors:  R Scott Braithwaite; Arthur Caplan
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2014-02-18

10.  Using the deductible for patient channeling: did preferred providers gain patient volume?

Authors:  Stéphanie A van der Geest; Marco Varkevisser
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.