Literature DB >> 21195492

Assessing biosecurity practices, movements and densities of poultry sites across Belgium, resulting in different farm risk-groups for infectious disease introduction and spread.

Sarah Van Steenwinkel1, Stefaan Ribbens, Els Ducheyne, Els Goossens, Jeroen Dewulf.   

Abstract

The existing diversity within poultry systems affects the potential risk of infectious disease introduction and spread. Population data on the level of biosecurity and between-farm contacts is scarce, despite its importance for identifying possible routes of disease transmission. A study was carried out in Belgium to investigate and differentiate professional and hobby poultry sites based on their biosecurity levels and farm movements. Questionnaire data from a total of 37 professional poultry farms, 19 hatcheries and 286 hobby poultry sites were analyzed using a combination of a linear scoring system, a Categorical principal component analysis (CATPCA) and a Two-Step cluster analysis (TSCA). In general, the level of biosecurity was lower in hobby poultry flocks, mainly due to the poor confinement against the outdoor environment and the poor infrastructural hygiene. Most Belgian professional poultry farms and hatcheries had an acceptable level of adoption of standard biosecurity practices, however less attention was given to the way transportation vehicles and employers were brought onto farms and professional visitors welcomed. Considerable variation in the movements and in the structure of the networks arising from these movements was found. Movement frequencies were higher at professional farms compared to hobby farms. Results showed that multiple category farming systems had the highest total movement frequencies. Monthly frequencies of professional visits often exceeded those of poultry and egg movements. Professional and hobby poultry sites were also connected, but movements of poultry and eggs were found only to occur from professional to hobby sites. However, hobby poultry keepers were personally purchasing the poultry and eggs on the professional poultry sites. Six groups of poultry sites were differentiated, which are interpreted as very low to very high risk groups, based on the potential of infectious disease introduction and spread.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21195492     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  15 in total

1.  The prevalence of Campylobacter species in broiler flocks and their environment: assessing the efficiency of chitosan/zinc oxide nanocomposite for adopting control strategy.

Authors:  Asmaa Nady Mohammed; Sahar Abdel Aleem Abdel Aziz
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Understanding the relative risks of zoonosis emergence under contrasting approaches to meeting livestock product demand.

Authors:  Harriet Bartlett; Mark A Holmes; Silviu O Petrovan; David R Williams; James L N Wood; Andrew Balmford
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 3.653

3.  Biosecurity on cattle farms: a study in north-west England.

Authors:  Marnie L Brennan; Robert M Christley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Extended transmission of two H5/H7 low pathogenic avian influenza viruses in chickens.

Authors:  G Claes; B Lambrecht; J Dewulf; T van den Berg; S Marché
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 4.434

5.  Risk for Low Pathogenicity Avian Influenza Virus on Poultry Farms, the Netherlands, 2007-2013.

Authors:  Ruth Bouwstra; Jose L Gonzales; Sjaak de Wit; Julia Stahl; Ron A M Fouchier; Armin R W Elbers
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 6.883

6.  "Catch 22": Biosecurity awareness, interpretation and practice amongst poultry catchers.

Authors:  Caroline Millman; Rob Christley; Dan Rigby; Diana Dennis; Sarah J O'Brien; Nicola Williams
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.670

7.  How commercial and non-commercial swine producers move pigs in Scotland: a detailed descriptive analysis.

Authors:  Thibaud Porphyre; Lisa A Boden; Carla Correia-Gomes; Harriet K Auty; George J Gunn; Mark E J Woolhouse
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Appraisal of Chicken Production with Associated Biosecurity Practices in Commercial Poultry Farms Located in Jos, Nigeria.

Authors:  C V Maduka; I O Igbokwe; N N Atsanda
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2016-04-21

9.  Expert Opinion on the Perceived Effectiveness and Importance of On-Farm Biosecurity Measures for Cattle and Swine Farms in Switzerland.

Authors:  Karin Kuster; Marie-Eve Cousin; Thomas Jemmi; Gertraud Schüpbach-Regula; Ioannis Magouras
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Role played by the environment in the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) through the food chain.

Authors:  Konstantinos Koutsoumanis; Ana Allende; Avelino Álvarez-Ordóñez; Declan Bolton; Sara Bover-Cid; Marianne Chemaly; Robert Davies; Alessandra De Cesare; Lieve Herman; Friederike Hilbert; Roland Lindqvist; Maarten Nauta; Giuseppe Ru; Marion Simmons; Panagiotis Skandamis; Elisabetta Suffredini; Héctor Argüello; Thomas Berendonk; Lina Maria Cavaco; William Gaze; Heike Schmitt; Ed Topp; Beatriz Guerra; Ernesto Liébana; Pietro Stella; Luisa Peixe
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.