Literature DB >> 21195283

Maxillary protraction with miniplates providing skeletal anchorage in a growing Class III patient.

Bong-Kuen Cha1, Dong-Soon Choi, Peter Ngan, Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann, Soung-Min Kim, In-San Jang.   

Abstract

Maxillary protraction headgear has been used in the treatment of Class III malocclusion with maxillary deficiency. However, loss of dental anchorage has been reported with tooth-borne anchorage such as lingual arches and expansion devices. This side effect can be minimized with skeletal anchorage devices such as implants, onplants, mini-implants, and miniplates. The use of miniplates for maxillary protraction in the mixed dentition has not been reported in the literature. This case report describes the treatment of an 8-year-old girl with a Class III malocclusion and maxillary deficiency. Miniplates were used as skeletal anchorage for maxillary protraction followed by phase 2 orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Skeletal, dental, and facial changes in response to orthopedic and orthodontic treatment are reported to illustrate the esthetics, function, and stability of treatment with this new technique. Copyright Â
© 2011 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21195283     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  17 in total

1.  Three-dimensional treatment planning for maxillary and mandibular segmental surgery for an adult Class III: Where old meets new.

Authors:  R Scott Conley; Sean P Edwards
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Comparison of the soft and hard tissue effects of two different protraction mechanisms in class III patients: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mevlut Celikoglu; Ibrahim Yavuz; Tuba Unal; Husamettin Oktay; Abdulvahit Erdem
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Eman H Elabbassy; Noha E Sabet; Islam T Hassan; Dina H Elghoul; Marwa A Elkassaby
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Bone thickness of the infrazygomatic crest area in skeletal Class III growing patients: A computed tomographic study.

Authors:  Hyub-Soo Lee; Hang-Moon Choi; Dong-Soon Choi; Insan Jang; Bong-Kuen Cha
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2013-12-12

5.  Comparison of facemask therapy effects using skeletal and tooth-borne anchorage.

Authors:  Hyeon-Jong Lee; Dong-Soon Choi; Insan Jang; Bong-Kuen Cha
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 6.  Bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP): A review.

Authors:  Apoorva Kamath; Shetty Suhani Sudhakar; Greeshma Kannan; Kripal Rai; Athul Sb
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2022-05-04

7.  New approach of maxillary protraction using modified C-palatal plates in Class III patients.

Authors:  Yoon-Ah Kook; Mohamed Bayome; Jae Hyun Park; Ki Beom Kim; Seong-Hun Kim; Kyu-Rhim Chung
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 8.  Effectiveness of TAD-anchored maxillary protraction in late mixed dentition.

Authors:  Xiaoxia Feng; Jianhua Li; Yu Li; Zhihe Zhao; Sen Zhao; Jue Wang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Displacements prediction from 3D finite element model of maxillary protraction with and without rapid maxillary expansion in a patient with unilateral cleft palate and alveolus.

Authors:  Dan Zhang; Li Zheng; Qiang Wang; Li Lu; Jia Ma
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.

Authors:  Peter Ngan; Benedict Wilmes; Dieter Drescher; Chris Martin; Bryan Weaver; Erdogan Gunel
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.