Literature DB >> 21195160

The intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility and predictivity of the KeratinoSens assay to predict skin sensitizers in vitro: results of a ring-study in five laboratories.

Natsch Andreas1, Bauch Caroline, Foertsch Leslie, Gerberick Frank, Norman Kimberly, Hilberer Allison, Inglis Heather, Landsiedel Robert, Onken Stefan, Reuter Hendrik, Schepky Andreas, Emter Roger.   

Abstract

Due to regulatory constraints and ethical considerations, research on alternatives to animal testing to predict the skin sensitization potential of novel chemicals has gained a high priority. Accordingly, different in vitro, in silico and in chemico approaches have been described in the scientific literature to achieve this goal. To replace regulatory approved animal tests, these alternatives need to be transferable to other labs, their within and between laboratory reproducibility must be assured, and their predictivity should be high. The KeratinoSens assay is a cell-based reporter gene assay to screen substances with a full dose-response assessment. It is based on a stable transgenic keratinocyte cell line. The induction of a luciferase gene under the control of the antioxidant response element (ARE) derived from the human AKR1C2 gene is determined. Here we report on the results of a ring-study with five laboratories performing the KeratinoSens assay on a set of 28 test substances. The assay was found to be easily transferable to all laboratories. Overall both the qualitative (sensitizer/non-sensitizer categorization) and the quantitative (concentration for significant gene induction) results were reproducible between laboratories. A detailed analysis of the transferability, the within- and between laboratory reproducibility and the predictivity is presented.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21195160     DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2010.12.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro        ISSN: 0887-2333            Impact factor:   3.500


  10 in total

1.  Perspectives on Non-Animal Alternatives for Assessing Sensitization Potential in Allergic Contact Dermatitis.

Authors:  Nripen S Sharma; Rohit Jindal; Bhaskar Mitra; Serom Lee; Lulu Li; Tim J Maguire; Rene Schloss; Martin L Yarmush
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.321

2.  Progress on Reconstructed Human Skin Models for Allergy Research and Identifying Contact Sensitizers.

Authors:  Charlotte Rodrigues Neves; Susan Gibbs
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.291

3.  Evaluation of the skin sensitization potential of metal oxide nanoparticles using the ARE-Nrf2 Luciferase KeratinoSensTM assay.

Authors:  Sung-Hyun Kim; DongHan Lee; JinHee Lee; Jun-Young Yang; JiHyun Seok; Kikyung Jung; JongKwon Lee
Journal:  Toxicol Res       Date:  2021-01-01

4.  Multiparameter toxicity assessment of novel DOPO-derived organophosphorus flame retardants.

Authors:  Cordula Hirsch; Britta Striegl; Stephanie Mathes; Christian Adlhart; Michael Edelmann; Epifania Bono; Sabyasachi Gaan; Khalifah A Salmeia; Lisa Hoelting; Alice Krebs; Johanna Nyffeler; Regina Pape; Alexander Bürkle; Marcel Leist; Peter Wick; Stefan Schildknecht
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 5.153

5.  Copper and Cobalt Ions Released from Metal Oxide Nanoparticles Trigger Skin Sensitization.

Authors:  Sung-Hyun Kim; Jin Hee Lee; Kikyung Jung; Jun-Young Yang; Hyo-Sook Shin; Jeong Pyo Lee; Jayoung Jeong; Jae-Ho Oh; Jong Kwon Lee
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  Determination of Chemical Irritation Potential Using a Defined Gene Signature Set on Tissue-Engineered Human Skin Equivalents.

Authors:  Amy L Harding; Craig Murdoch; Simon Danby; Md Zobaer Hasan; Hirofumi Nakanishi; Tetsuo Furuno; Sirwan Hadad; Robert Turner; Helen E Colley
Journal:  JID Innov       Date:  2021-03-15

Review 7.  A Multi-Organ-on-Chip Approach to Investigate How Oral Exposure to Metals Can Cause Systemic Toxicity Leading to Langerhans Cell Activation in Skin.

Authors:  Jasper J Koning; Charlotte T Rodrigues Neves; Katharina Schimek; Maria Thon; Sander W Spiekstra; Taco Waaijman; Tanja D de Gruijl; Susan Gibbs
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-02-15

8.  Prediction of chemical respiratory sensitizers using GARD, a novel in vitro assay based on a genomic biomarker signature.

Authors:  Andy Forreryd; Henrik Johansson; Ann-Sofie Albrekt; Carl A K Borrebaeck; Malin Lindstedt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Green Toxicology: a strategy for sustainable chemical and material development.

Authors:  Sarah E Crawford; Thomas Hartung; Henner Hollert; Björn Mathes; Bennard van Ravenzwaay; Thomas Steger-Hartmann; Christoph Studer; Harald F Krug
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 5.893

10.  Controlled release of ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone from a single ototopical administration of antibiotic-loaded polymer microspheres and thermoresponsive gel.

Authors:  Liza A Bruk; Katherine E Dunkelberger; Pawjai Khampang; Wenzhou Hong; Srivatsun Sadagopan; Cuneyt M Alper; Morgan V Fedorchak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.