Literature DB >> 21195102

The influence of information structure on the depth of semantic processing: how focus and pitch accent determine the size of the N400 effect.

Lin Wang1, Marcel Bastiaansen2, Yufang Yang3, Peter Hagoort4.   

Abstract

To highlight relevant information in dialogues, both wh-question context and pitch accent in answers can be used, such that focused information gains more attention and is processed more elaborately. To evaluate the relative influence of context and pitch accent on the depth of semantic processing, we measured event-related potentials (ERPs) to auditorily presented wh-question-answer pairs. A semantically incongruent word in the answer occurred either in focus or in non-focus position as determined by the context, and this word was either accented or unaccented. Semantic incongruency elicited different N400 effects in different conditions. The largest N400 effect was found when the question-marked focus was accented, while the other three conditions elicited smaller N400 effects. The results suggest that context and accentuation interact. Thus accented focused words were processed more deeply compared to conditions where focus and accentuation mismatched, or when the new information had no marking. In addition, there seems to be sex differences in the depth of semantic processing. For males, a significant N400 effect was observed only when the question-marked focus was accented, reduced N400 effects were found in the other dialogues. In contrast, females produced similar N400 effects in all the conditions. These results suggest that regardless of external cues, females tend to engage in more elaborate semantic processing compared to males.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21195102     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  18 in total

Review 1.  A review on the cognitive function of information structure during language comprehension.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Xiaoqing Li; Yufang Yang
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  The processing difference between person names and common nouns in sentence contexts: an ERP study.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Rinus G Verdonschot; Yufang Yang
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-01-10

3.  The effect of discourse structure on depth of semantic integration in reading.

Authors:  Xiaohong Yang; Lijing Chen; Yufang Yang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-02

4.  ERP evidence on the interaction between information structure and emotional salience of words.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Marcel Bastiaansen; Yufang Yang; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.526

5.  Conversation electrified: ERP correlates of speech act recognition in underspecified utterances.

Authors:  Rosa S Gisladottir; Dorothee J Chwilla; Stephen C Levinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  When correction turns positive: processing corrective prosody in Dutch.

Authors:  Diana V Dimitrova; Laurie A Stowe; John C J Hoeks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Information structure influences depth of syntactic processing: event-related potential evidence for the Chomsky illusion.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Marcel Bastiaansen; Yufang Yang; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  MUC (Memory, Unification, Control) and beyond.

Authors:  Peter Hagoort
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-12

9.  Topic structure affects semantic integration: evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Xiaohong Yang; Xuhai Chen; Shuang Chen; Xiaoying Xu; Yufang Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  How Distance Affects Semantic Integration in Discourse: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials.

Authors:  Xiaohong Yang; Shuang Chen; Xuhai Chen; Yufang Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.