Literature DB >> 21194890

Trade-off between benefit and harm is crucial in health screening recommendations. Part I: general principles.

Leonila F Dans1, Maria Asuncion A Silvestre, Antonio L Dans.   

Abstract

Health screening is defined as the use of a test or a series of tests to detect unrecognized health risks or preclinical disease in apparently healthy populations to permit prevention and timely intervention. A health screening strategy consists of the sequence of a screening test, confirmatory test(s), and finally, treatment(s) for the condition detected. The potential benefits of health screening are easy to understand, but the huge potential for physical and psychological harm is less well recognized. Thus, health screening should only be recommended when five criteria are satisfied: (1) the burden of illness should be high, (2) the tests for screening and confirmation should be accurate, (3) early treatment (or prevention) must be more effective than late treatment, (4) the test(s) and treatment(s) must be safe, and (5) the cost of the screening strategy must be commensurate with potential benefit. Direct evidence from screening trials is subject to less bias. In some instances, indirect evidence may be acceptable, e.g., when the condition screened for is a risk factor for a disease rather than the disease itself. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21194890     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  5 in total

1.  Shortening the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain-Revised (SOAPP-R): A Proof-of-Principle Study for Customized Computer-Based Testing.

Authors:  Matthew D Finkelman; Ronald J Kulich; Kevin L Zacharoff; Niels Smits; Britta E Magnuson; Jinghui Dong; Stephen F Butler
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.750

2.  Multi-centre analysis of incidental findings on low-resolution CT attenuation correction images.

Authors:  J Coward; R Lawson; T Kane; M Elias; A Howes; J Birchall; P Hogg
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  An alternative method for Frailty Index cut-off points to define frailty categories.

Authors:  Roman Romero-Ortuno
Journal:  Eur Geriatr Med       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 1.710

Review 4.  Quantification of harms in cancer screening trials: literature review.

Authors:  Bruno Heleno; Maria F Thomsen; David S Rodrigues; Karsten J Jørgensen; John Brodersen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-09-16

5.  Primary Care Physicians' Action Plans for Responding to Results of Screening Tests Based on the Concept of Quaternary Prevention.

Authors:  Jong-Myon Bae; Marc Jamoulle
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2016-10-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.