Literature DB >> 21194660

Improving adherence with the use of hip protectors among older people living in nursing care facilities: a cluster randomized trial.

Ian D Cameron1, Susan E Kurrle, Susan Quine, Philip N Sambrook, Lyn March, Daniel K Y Chan, Keri Lockwood, Bronwyn Cook, Frederieke F Schaafsma.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To test different adherent strategies aimed at improving hip protector use among nursing care facility residents. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A cluster randomized controlled trial with 234 residents older than 75 years from 9 units of 7 nursing care facilities in the Northern Sydney region, Australia. INTERVENTION: Residents were cluster randomized in 3 groups. The first group received hard shell hip protectors without cost (no cost group). The second group received an educational session, a demonstration of the use of hip protectors, and free choice of type of hip protectors without cost (combined group). The third group was the control group who received a brochure about hip protectors. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was adherence with the use of hip protectors at 3 and 6 months after recruitment. Secondary outcomes were falls, injuries, and fractures.
RESULTS: No participants in the control group purchased hip protectors at any stage. At 3 months, 33% of participants in the no cost group and 27% in the combined group wore a hip protector at the time of visit. This declined to 25% and 24% respectively at 6 months. No significant difference was seen in any of the 3 adherence outcomes between the 2 intervention groups. The number of falls or hospitalizations did not differ between groups, with 5 hip fractures reported during the intervention period. Residents were more likely to be adherent if they were female and had greater restriction in daily activities.
CONCLUSION: Providing free hip protectors to older people living in nursing care facilities was necessary to increase initial acceptance and adherence. Nevertheless, after 6 months the achieved level of adherence was not high enough to be associated with a reduction of hip fractures. The provision of educational sessions and demonstrations to nursing staff and participants had no added value in this trial.
Copyright © 2011 American Medical Directors Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21194660     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2010.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc        ISSN: 1525-8610            Impact factor:   4.669


  2 in total

1.  Increasing adherence with the use of hip protectors for older people living in the community.

Authors:  I D Cameron; S Kurrle; S Quine; P Sambrook; L March; D Chan; J Stocks; K Lockwood; B Cook; F G Schaafsma
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Treatment of Osteoporosis in Australian Residential Aged Care Facilities: Update on Consensus Recommendations for Fracture Prevention.

Authors:  Gustavo Duque; Stephen R Lord; Jenson Mak; Kirtan Ganda; Jacqueline J T Close; Peter Ebeling; Alexandra Papaioannou; Charles A Inderjeeth
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 4.669

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.