Literature DB >> 21194545

Olanzapine and risperidone disrupt conditioned avoidance responding by selectively weakening motivational salience of conditioned stimulus: further evidence.

Chen Zhang1, Yiru Fang, Ming Li.   

Abstract

Suppression of conditioned avoidance response is a preclinical behavioral index of antipsychotic activity. Previous work shows that olanzapine and risperidone disrupt avoidance response elicited by a less salient conditioned stimulus (CS2) to a greater extent than avoidance elicited by a more salient stimulus (CS1), suggesting that antipsychotic drugs may have a weakening action on motivational salience of stimuli. In the present study, we further examined this mechanism of antipsychotic action, focusing on the possible impact of baseline difference of CS1 and CS2 response rates on the avoidance-disruptive effect of olanzapine and risperidone. Rats were first trained to acquire avoidance responding in a procedure in which the number of CS2 trials (i.e. 20) was twice the number of CS1 trials (i.e. 10), but the percentage of CS2-shock pairing was set at 25% lower (15 trials out of 20) than the percentage of CS1-shock pairing (20 trials out of 20). They were then tested daily under olanzapine (0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg, sc) or risperidone (0.33 and 1.0 mg/kg, sc) for 5 consecutive days. Repeated olanzapine and risperidone treatment dose-dependently disrupted avoidance responding to both CS1 and CS2. Both drugs at the high dose disrupted the CS2 avoidance to a greater extent than the CS1 avoidance. In the final challenge test, rats previously treated with olanzapine were tested under risperidone (0.33 mg/kg), whereas rats previously treated with risperidone were tested under olanzapine (0.5 mg/kg). Results show that rats previously treated with risperidone 1.0mg/kg group made significantly fewer avoidance responses than the vehicles under olanzapine at 0.5 mg/kg. These findings confirm that olanzapine and risperidone disrupt avoidance response primarily by selectively attenuating the motivational salience of the CS. The present study also suggests that there is a generality of antipsychotic drug experience that is mediated by a shared interoceptive drug state mechanism.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21194545      PMCID: PMC3040423          DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2010.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  30 in total

Review 1.  The conditioned avoidance response test re-evaluated: is it a sensitive test for the detection of potentially atypical antipsychotics?

Authors:  M L Wadenberg; P B Hicks
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Antipsychotic dosing in preclinical models is often unrepresentative of the clinical condition: a suggested solution based on in vivo occupancy.

Authors:  Shitij Kapur; Susan C VanderSpek; Barbara A Brownlee; Jose N Nobrega
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2003-02-20       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  Continuing implications of the early evidence against the drive-reduction hypothesis of the behavioral effects of drugs.

Authors:  Donald E McMillan; Jonathan L Katz
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2002-08-29       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Motivational views of reinforcement: implications for understanding the behavioral functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine.

Authors:  John D Salamone; Mercè Correa
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2002-12-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The emergence of behavioral pharmacology.

Authors:  James E Barrett
Journal:  Mol Interv       Date:  2002-12

6.  Peter B. Dews and pharmacological studies on behavior.

Authors:  James E Barrett; Jack Bergman
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Distinct neural mechanisms underlying acute and repeated administration of antipsychotic drugs in rat avoidance conditioning.

Authors:  Ming Li; Tao Sun; Chen Zhang; Gang Hu
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-07-10       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 8.  The role of nucleus accumbens dopamine in motivated behavior: a unifying interpretation with special reference to reward-seeking.

Authors:  S Ikemoto; J Panksepp
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  1999-12

9.  Olanzapine and risperidone disrupt conditioned avoidance responding in phencyclidine-pretreated or amphetamine-pretreated rats by selectively weakening motivational salience of conditioned stimulus.

Authors:  Ming Li; Wei He; Alexa Mead
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.293

10.  Avoidance-suppressing effect of antipsychotic drugs is progressively potentiated after repeated administration: an interoceptive drug state mechanism.

Authors:  A Mead; M Li
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 4.153

View more
  12 in total

1.  Clozapine, but not olanzapine, disrupts conditioned avoidance response in rats by antagonizing 5-HT2A/2C receptors.

Authors:  Ming Li; Tao Sun; Alexa Mead
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 3.575

2.  Avoidance disruptive effect of clozapine and olanzapine is potentiated by increasing the test trials: further test of the motivational salience hypothesis.

Authors:  Min Feng; Nan Sui; Ming Li
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.533

3.  Repeated asenapine treatment produces a sensitization effect in two preclinical tests of antipsychotic activity.

Authors:  Rongyin Qin; Yingzhu Chen; Ming Li
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.250

4.  Pharmacological validation of candidate causal sleep genes identified in an N2 cross.

Authors:  Joseph I Brunner; Anthony L Gotter; Joshua Millstein; Susan Garson; Jacquelyn Binns; Steven V Fox; Alan T Savitz; He S Yang; Karrie Fitzpatrick; Lili Zhou; Joseph R Owens; Andrea L Webber; Martha H Vitaterna; Andrew Kasarskis; Victor N Uebele; Fred Turek; John J Renger; Christopher J Winrow
Journal:  J Neurogenet       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.250

5.  Drug-drug conditioning between citalopram and haloperidol or olanzapine in a conditioned avoidance response model: implications for polypharmacy in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Nathan L Sparkman; Ming Li
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.293

6.  Long-lasting sensitization induced by repeated risperidone treatment in adolescent Sprague-Dawley rats: a possible D2 receptor mediated phenomenon?

Authors:  Jing Qiao; Jun Gao; Qing Shu; Qinglin Zhang; Gang Hu; Ming Li
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Neuroanatomical substrates of the disruptive effect of olanzapine on rat maternal behavior as revealed by c-Fos immunoreactivity.

Authors:  Changjiu Zhao; Ming Li
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.533

8.  Time-dependence of risperidone and asenapine sensitization and associated D2 receptor mechanism.

Authors:  Jun Gao; Ming Li
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  An automatic recording system for the study of escape from fear in rats.

Authors:  Ming Li; Wei He
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Long-term impacts of adolescent risperidone treatment on behavioral responsiveness to olanzapine and clozapine in adulthood.

Authors:  Jing Qiao; Qinglin Zhang; Ming Li
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 5.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.