Literature DB >> 21193969

Gemcitabine and cisplatin salvage regimen in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer: a Brazilian experience.

Luiz Henrique de Lima Araújo1, Marcos Veloso Moitinho, Ana Maria Fantini Silva, Cleudes Alice Sousa Gomes, Hélio Noronha Júnior.   

Abstract

Gemcitabine and cisplatin combination (Gem-Cis) is a commonly used regimen in metastatic breast cancer (MBC), with proven activity in phase II trials. It is mostly used as a salvage regimen for progressive disease refractory to anthracyclines and taxanes, and when liver dysfunction secondary to liver metastasis precludes these drugs. Retrospective review of medical charts was conducted for patients treated with Gem-Cis for MBC in a single institution in Brazil between January 2004 and July 2007. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes and toxicity of Gem-Cis in a broad indication, including patients with deteriorated performance status (PS) and liver dysfunction, which were excluded from clinical trials. Fifty-six patients were included. Median age was 52 years, 46.4% were hormone-receptor negative, 57.2% received 3 or more prior chemotherapy lines, and 34 had liver metastasis. The median overall survival (OS) was 7.6 months, the median progression-free survival was 3.3 months, and the response rate was 21.2%. In variable analysis, PS was significantly associated with OS, even after adjusting to other factors. Toxicities included grades 3 or 4 anemia in 19.3%, neutropenia in 21.1%, and thrombocytopenia in 12.3%. Gem-Cis was a relatively active combination in this population that typically carries a poor prognosis. The subgroup of patients with favorable PS experienced longer survival, even when liver metastasis and hepatic dysfunction were a concern. Toxicity was manageable and it was not correlated with PS or liver dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21193969     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-010-9654-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  12 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Gemcitabine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy as a first-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Taha Zaki Mohamad Mohran
Journal:  J Egypt Natl Canc Inst       Date:  2004-03

Review 3.  Effective but cost-prohibitive drugs in breast cancer treatment: a clinician's perspective.

Authors:  Jose Bines; Alexandru Eniu
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Phase II study of gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group Trial.

Authors:  Patrick A Burch; James A Mailliard; David W Hillman; Edith A Perez; James E Krook; Kendrith M Rowland; Michael H Veeder; Michael W Cannon; James N Ingle
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.339

5.  Phase II study of a gemcitabine and cisplatin combination regimen in taxane resistant metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Jae Hong Seo; Sang Cheul Oh; Cheul Won Choi; Byung Soo Kim; Sang Won Shin; Yeul Hong Kim; Jun Suk Kim; Ae-Ree Kim; Jae-Bok Lee; Bum Hwan Koo
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  High efficacy of gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with predominantly anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  V Heinemann; H J Stemmler; A Wohlrab; D Bosse; C Losem; S Kahlert; G Rauthe
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Are chemotherapy response rates related to treatment-induced survival prolongations in patients with advanced cancer?

Authors:  Tait D Shanafelt; Charles Loprinzi; Randolph Marks; Paul Novotny; Jeff Sloan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-04-26       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Cancer statistics, 2009.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Yongping Hao; Jiaquan Xu; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Phase II studies of gemcitabine and cisplatin in heavily and minimally pretreated metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Helen K Chew; James H Doroshow; Paul Frankel; Kim A Margolin; George Somlo; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Michael Gordon; Wu Zhang; Dongyun Yang; Christy Russell; Darcy Spicer; Tim Synold; Robert Bayer; Alexander Hantel; Patrick J Stiff; Merry L Tetef; David R Gandara; Kathy S Albain
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Breast cancer therapy for BRCA1 carriers: moving towards platinum standard?

Authors:  Evgeny N Imyanitov
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 2.857

View more
  1 in total

1.  Metals and breast cancer: risk factors or healing agents?

Authors:  Ana-Maria Florea; Dietrich Büsselberg
Journal:  J Toxicol       Date:  2011-07-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.