Literature DB >> 21193912

PSA density lower cutoff value as a tool to exclude pathologic upstaging in initially diagnosed unilateral prostate cancer: impact on hemiablative focal therapy.

Thomas Hofner1, Jesco Pfitzenmaier, Adel Alrabadi, Sascha Pahernik, Boris Hadaschik, Nina Wagener, Nenad Djakovic, Axel Haferkamp, Markus Hohenfellner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor for pathologic upstaging in patients initially thought to have unilateral prostate cancer.
METHODS: We analyzed 438 patients with unilateral prostate cancer in prostate biopsy samples that were treated with radical prostatectomy. Bilateral or extracapsular growth in the final surgical specimens was defined as upstaging. Using Kaplan-Meier curves and a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, we evaluated the oncologic effect of pathologic upstaging on biochemical recurrence-free survival. Prostate-specific antigen density was evaluated as a diagnostic tool to predict upstaging using ROC-curve analysis.
RESULTS: Of the patients, 30.8% had bilateral prostate cancer or extracapsular extension in the surgical specimen. Prostate-specific antigen density was a diagnostic predictor for pathologic upstaging in patients initially thought to have unilateral prostate cancer (AUC 0.62, P < 0.001). Using a lower cutoff value of PSA density <0.056 ng/ml/cm3, upstaging could be excluded in patients with a sensitivity of >98%.
CONCLUSIONS: A considerable amount of patients that are initially diagnosed with unilateral prostate cancer on biopsy are underdiagnosed and are upstaged in the radical prostatectomy specimen. In general, AUC of PSA density is too low to use PSA density as diagnostic tool to predict pathologic upstaging in all patients. Nonetheless, PSA density could be used for hemiablative focal therapy decision making using a lower cutoff value of <0.056 ng/ml/cm3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21193912     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-010-0631-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  24 in total

1.  Small transrectal ultrasound volume predicts clinically significant Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy: results from the SEARCH database.

Authors:  Ryan S Turley; Robert J Hamilton; Martha K Terris; Christopher J Kane; William J Aronson; Joseph C Presti; Christopher L Amling; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Prostate-specific antigen versus prostate-specific antigen density as predictor of tumor volume, margin status, pathologic stage, and biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stephen A Brassell; Tzu-Cheg Kao; Leon Sun; Judd W Moul
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Staging saturation biopsy in patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance protocol.

Authors:  Robert Abouassaly; Brian R Lane; J Stephen Jones
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Prostate specific antigen versus prostate specific antigen density as a prognosticator of pathological characteristics and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ahmed Magheli; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Bruce J Trock; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Alan W Partin; Misop Han; Mark L Gonzalgo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Patient selection for hemiablative focal therapy of prostate cancer: variables predictive of tumor unilaterality based upon radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Thomas J Polascik; Janice M Mayes; Florian R Schroeck; Leon Sun; John F Madden; Judd W Moul; Vladimir Mouraviev
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Pathologic basis of focal therapy for early-stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Vladimir Mouraviev; Janice M Mayes; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Three-dimensional prostate mapping biopsy has a potentially significant impact on prostate cancer management.

Authors:  Gary Onik; Matthew Miessau; David G Bostwick
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Current status of MRI for the diagnosis, staging and prognosis of prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy and active surveillance.

Authors:  Arnauld Villers; Laurent Lemaitre; Jérémie Haffner; Philippe Puech
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.309

9.  Combined prostate-specific antigen density and biopsy features to predict "clinically insignificant" prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Kimberly A Roehl; C Shad Thaxton; William J Catalona
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Appropriate candidates for hemiablative focal therapy are infrequently encountered among men selected for radical prostatectomy in contemporary cohort.

Authors:  Basir Tareen; Alex Sankin; Guilherme Godoy; Steve Temkin; Herbert Lepor; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Focal therapy of prostate cancer: evidence-based analysis for modern selection criteria.

Authors:  Michael R Abern; Matvey Tsivian; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Parameters predicting postoperative unilateral disease in patients with unilateral prostate cancer in diagnostic biopsy: a rationale for selecting hemiablative focal therapy candidates.

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Petros Perimenis
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Prostate-specific antigen and prostate-specific antigen density cutoff points among Indonesian population suspected for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ahmad Anies Shahab; Doddy M Soebadi; Wahjoe Djatisoesanto; Sunaryo Hardjowijoto; Soetojo Soetojo; Lukman Hakim
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2013-01-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.