Literature DB >> 21193237

Duty-cycled unipolar/bipolar versus conventional radiofrequency ablation in paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation.

Christine Tivig1, Lam Dang, Hans-Peter Brunner-La Rocca, Sibel Özcan, Firat Duru, Christoph Scharf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Duty-cycled (DC) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) has been introduced, however, data on large patient series and comparison to conventional RFA are scarce.
METHODS: Between 2006 and 2008 DC RFA was performed in 209 consecutive patients (143 (68%) paroxysmal and 66 (32%) persistent AF). As controls served 211 patients, 155 (73%) with paroxysmal and 56 (27%) with persistent AF (p=0.3). In DC RFA, the pulmonary veins (PV) were isolated followed by ablation at the septum and left atrium, if AF persisted. Conventional PV isolation was followed by anatomical lines at the roof and mitral isthmus.
RESULTS: Freedom of paroxysmal AF was demonstrated after 1.08 DC RFA procedures per patient in 82% and after 1.19 conventional procedures in 87% after 8.5 ± 6.5 months (ns). In persistent AF, success rates were 79% after 1.35 DC RFA procedures and 80% after 1.34 conventional procedures after 11.5 ± 8.5 months (ns). The subgroup analysis of 119 patients with follow-up ≥ 12 months (17.5 [14.1-23.6] months) showed similar results. Left atrial flutter occurred in 3% and 8% after paroxysmal AF ablation (p < 0.05) and in 12% and 23% after persistent AF ablation (p=0.1). Multivariate predictors for success in both groups were age, left atrial size, presence of persistent vs. paroxysmal AF and previous pacemaker implantation, but not the ablation technique used. Non-fatal complications were seen in 2.8% with no differences between the groups.
CONCLUSION: Outcome in DC RFA is similar to conventional RFA with a final success rate exceeding 80% in both paroxysmal and persistent AF in the absence of fatal complications.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21193237     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  11 in total

1.  Point-by-point pulmonary vein antrum isolation guided by intracardiac echocardiography and 3D mapping and duty-cycled multipolar AF ablation: effect of multipolar ablation on procedure duration and fluoroscopy time.

Authors:  Yaariv Khaykin; Lauren Zarnett; Daniel Friedlander; Zaev A Wulffhart; Bonnie Whaley; David Giewercer; Bernice Tsang; Atul Verma
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  Multi-Electrode Ablation Catheters for AF Ablation: Effective Reality or Elegant Experiment?

Authors:  Lucas Boersma
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2012-06-15

Review 3.  Comparison of the Efficacy of PVAC® and nMARQ for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Avishag Laish-Farkash; Mahmoud Suleiman
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2017-04-30

4.  Pulmonary vein isolation to treat paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: conventional versus multi-electrode radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Rypko J Beukema; Arif Elvan; Jaap Jan J Smit; Peter Paul H M Delnoy; Anand R Ramdat Misier; Vivek Reddy
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 5.  Phased RF Ablation: Results and Concerns.

Authors:  Alexandra Kiss; Gábor Sándorfi; Edina Nagy-Baló; Mihran Martirosyan; Zoltan Csanadi
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-06-30

6.  European survey on efficacy and safety of duty-cycled radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  C Scharf; G A Ng; M Wieczorek; T Deneke; S S Furniss; St Murray; Ph Debruyne; N Hobson; R F Berntsen; M A Schneider; H A Hauer; F Halimi; S Boveda; S Asbach; L Boesche; M Zimmermann; F Brigadeau; J Taieb; M Merkel; M Pfyffer; H P Brunner-La Rocca; L V A Boersma
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 5.214

7.  Current issues in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Yaariv Khaykin; Yana Shamiss
Journal:  ISRN Cardiol       Date:  2012-06-21

8.  Safety and efficacy of multipolar pulmonary vein ablation catheter vs. irrigated radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized multicentre trial.

Authors:  J McCready; A W Chow; M D Lowe; O R Segal; S Ahsan; J de Bono; M Dhaliwal; C Mfuko; A Ng; E R Rowland; R J W Bradley; J Paisey; P Roberts; J M Morgan; A Sandilands; A Yue; P D Lambiase
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 9.  Current hot potatoes in atrial fibrillation ablation.

Authors:  Laurent Roten; Nicolas Derval; Patrizio Pascale; Daniel Scherr; Yuki Komatsu; Ashok Shah; Khaled Ramoul; Arnaud Denis; Frédéric Sacher; Mélèze Hocini; Michel Haïssaguerre; Pierre Jaïs
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2012-11

10.  Pulmonary vein isolation using multi-electrode radiofrequency vs conventional point-by-point radiofrequency ablation: A meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies.

Authors:  Dursun Aras; Serkan Topaloglu; Serkan Cay; Ozcan Ozeke; Firat Ozcan; Goksel Cagirci
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2017-02-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.