Lesley Stafford1, Fiona Judd. 1. Centre for Women's Mental Health, Royal Women's Hospital, Locked Bag 300, Parkville, 3052 Parkville, Victoria, Australia. Lesley.stafford@thewomens.org.au
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate challenges to quality of life (QOL) among women previously diagnosed with gynaecologic cancer accessing a metropolitan Australian oncology service. Indices of QOL investigated were anxiety, depression, sexual morbidity, body image and supportive care needs. Findings are to inform service planning and research priorities. METHODS: This study is a cross-sectional analysis of 176 women diagnosed with gynaecologic cancer from 1997 to 2006. Data were collected from medical records and via self-report questionnaire comprising validated measures of QOL indices. RESULTS: Respondents have cancers of the endometrium (n = 56, 32%), ovary (n = 71, 40%), cervix (n = 27, 15%) and other less common types (n = 22, 13%). Mean (SD) age and time since diagnosis were 58.6 (13.2) and 4.7 (2.9) years, respectively. Using cut-offs of ≥ 8 and ≥ 11 on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, 55 (31%) and 27 (15%) women reported anxiety and 28 (16%) and 10 (6%) women reported depression, respectively. On average, 5.26 unmet needs were reported. Concerns about recurrence were the most common unmet need (30%). Two thirds had not been sexually active in the preceding month. Most (87%) were not worried about their sex life or lack thereof. Mean (SD) score on the Body Image Scale was 7.21 (7.37). Tumour groups did not differ on any outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite limitations, these data shed light on challenges to QOL of a heterogeneous group of gynaecologic cancer survivors. Sexual and psychological morbidity outcomes compare favourably with the literature while body image disturbance may present a useful target for clinical intervention.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate challenges to quality of life (QOL) among women previously diagnosed with gynaecologic cancer accessing a metropolitan Australian oncology service. Indices of QOL investigated were anxiety, depression, sexual morbidity, body image and supportive care needs. Findings are to inform service planning and research priorities. METHODS: This study is a cross-sectional analysis of 176 women diagnosed with gynaecologic cancer from 1997 to 2006. Data were collected from medical records and via self-report questionnaire comprising validated measures of QOL indices. RESULTS: Respondents have cancers of the endometrium (n = 56, 32%), ovary (n = 71, 40%), cervix (n = 27, 15%) and other less common types (n = 22, 13%). Mean (SD) age and time since diagnosis were 58.6 (13.2) and 4.7 (2.9) years, respectively. Using cut-offs of ≥ 8 and ≥ 11 on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, 55 (31%) and 27 (15%) women reported anxiety and 28 (16%) and 10 (6%) women reported depression, respectively. On average, 5.26 unmet needs were reported. Concerns about recurrence were the most common unmet need (30%). Two thirds had not been sexually active in the preceding month. Most (87%) were not worried about their sex life or lack thereof. Mean (SD) score on the Body Image Scale was 7.21 (7.37). Tumour groups did not differ on any outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite limitations, these data shed light on challenges to QOL of a heterogeneous group of gynaecologic cancer survivors. Sexual and psychological morbidity outcomes compare favourably with the literature while body image disturbance may present a useful target for clinical intervention.
Authors: Susan K Lutgendorf; Barrie Anderson; Philip Ullrich; Erica L Johnsen; Richard E Buller; Anil K Sood; Joel I Sorosky; Justine Ritchie Journal: Cancer Date: 2002-01-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Karin C H M Bisseling; Srinivas Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan; Ruud L M Bekkers; Monika Janda; Andreas Obermair Journal: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 2.100
Authors: Lari Wenzel; Kathryn Osann; Susie Hsieh; Jo A Tucker; Bradley J Monk; Edward L Nelson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-02-23 Impact factor: 44.544