Literature DB >> 21191133

The role of "rescue saccades" in tracking objects through occlusions.

Gregory J Zelinsky1, Andrei Todor.   

Abstract

We hypothesize that our ability to track objects through occlusions is mediated by timely assistance from gaze in the form of "rescue saccades"-eye movements to tracked objects that are in danger of being lost due to impending occlusion. Observers tracked 2-4 target sharks (out of 9) for 20 s as they swam through a rendered 3D underwater scene. Targets were either allowed to enter into occlusions (occlusion trials) or not (no occlusion trials). Tracking accuracy with 2-3 targets was ≥ 92% regardless of target occlusion but dropped to 74% on occlusion trials with four targets (no occlusion trials remained accurate; 83%). This pattern was mirrored in the frequency of rescue saccades. Rescue saccades accompanied approximatlely 50% of the Track 2-3 target occlusions, but only 34% of the Track 4 occlusions. Their frequency also decreased with increasing distance between a target and the nearest other object, suggesting that it is the potential for target confusion that summons a rescue saccade, not occlusion itself. These findings provide evidence for a tracking system that monitors for events that might cause track loss (e.g., occlusions) and requests help from the oculomotor system to resolve these momentary crises. As the number of crises increase with the number of targets, some requests for help go unsatisfied, resulting in degraded tracking.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21191133     DOI: 10.1167/10.14.29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  13 in total

1.  EEG correlates of attentional load during multiple object tracking.

Authors:  Heather Sternshein; Yigal Agam; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Remapping attention in multiple object tracking.

Authors:  Piers D L Howe; Trafton Drew; Yair Pinto; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Swapping or dropping? Electrophysiological measures of difficulty during multiple object tracking.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Todd S Horowitz; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-11-07

4.  TAM: Explaining off-object fixations and central fixation tendencies as effects of population averaging during search.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2012-05-23

5.  Multiple Players Tracking in Virtual Reality: Influence of Soccer Specific Trajectories and Relationship With Gaze Activity.

Authors:  Alexandre Vu; Anthony Sorel; Annabelle Limballe; Benoit Bideau; Richard Kulpa
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-20

6.  Unequal allocation of overt and covert attention in Multiple Object Tracking.

Authors:  Veronica Hadjipanayi; Andria Shimi; Casimir J H Ludwig; Christopher Kent
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 2.157

7.  Stroboscopic Vision When Interacting With Multiple Moving Objects: Perturbation Is Not the Same as Elimination.

Authors:  Simon J Bennett; Spencer J Hayes; Makoto Uji
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-25

8.  Goal-directed unequal attention allocation during multiple object tracking.

Authors:  Emily M Crowe; Christina J Howard; Angela S Attwood; Christopher Kent
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 9.  Eye Behavior During Multiple Object Tracking and Multiple Identity Tracking.

Authors:  Jukka Hyönä; Jie Li; Lauri Oksama
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-31

10.  Interactive multiple object tracking (iMOT).

Authors:  Ian M Thornton; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Todd S Horowitz; Aksel Rynning; Seong-Whan Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.