Literature DB >> 21191116

Gene pathways associated with prognosis and chemotherapy sensitivity in molecular subtypes of breast cancer.

Takayuki Iwamoto1, Giampaolo Bianchini, Daniel Booser, Yuan Qi, Charles Coutant, Christine Ya-Hui Shiang, Libero Santarpia, Junji Matsuoka, Gabriel N Hortobagyi, William Fraser Symmans, Frankie A Holmes, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Beth Hellerstedt, John Pippen, Fabrice Andre, Richard Simon, Lajos Pusztai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that distinct biological processes might be associated with prognosis and chemotherapy sensitivity in the different types of breast cancers.
METHODS: We performed gene set analyses with BRB-ArrayTools statistical software including 2331 functionally annotated gene sets (ie, lists of genes that correspond to a particular biological pathway or biochemical function) assembled from Ingenuity Pathway Analysis and Gene Ontology databases corresponding to almost all known biological processes. Gene set analysis was performed on gene expression data from three cohorts of 234, 170, and 175 patients with HER2-normal lymph node-negative breast cancer who received no systemic adjuvant therapy to identify gene sets associated prognosis and three additional cohorts of 198, 85, and 62 patients with HER2-normal stage I-III breast cancer who received preoperative chemotherapy to identify gene sets associated with pathological complete response to therapy. These analyses were performed separately for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative breast cancers. Interaction between gene sets and survival and treatment response by breast cancer subtype was assessed in individual datasets and also in pooled datasets. Statistical significance was estimated with permutation test. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: For ER-positive cancers, from 370 to 434 gene sets were associated with prognosis (P ≤ .05) and from 209 to 267 gene sets were associated with chemotherapy response in analysis by individual dataset. For ER-positive cancers, 131 gene sets were associated with prognosis and 69 were associated with pathological complete response (P ≤.001) in pooled analysis. Increased expression of cell cycle-related gene sets was associated with poor prognosis, and B-cell immunity-related gene sets were associated with good prognosis. For ER-negative cancers, from 175 to 288 gene sets were associated with prognosis and from 212 to 285 gene sets were associated with chemotherapy response. In pooled analyses of ER-negative cancers, 14 gene sets were associated with prognosis and 23 were associated with response. Gene sets involved in sphingolipid and glycolipid metabolism were associated with better prognosis and those involved in base excision repair, cell aging, and spindle microtubule regulation were associated with chemotherapy response.
CONCLUSION: Different biological processes were associated with prognosis and chemotherapy response in ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21191116     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djq524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  108 in total

1.  Mutation profiling identifies numerous rare drug targets and distinct mutation patterns in different clinical subtypes of breast cancers.

Authors:  Libero Santarpia; Yuan Qi; Katherine Stemke-Hale; Bailiang Wang; Elliana J Young; Daniel J Booser; Frankie A Holmes; Joyce O'Shaughnessy; Beth Hellerstedt; John Pippen; Tatiana Vidaurre; Henry Gomez; Vicente Valero; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; W Fraser Symmans; Giulia Bottai; Angelo Di Leo; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Subtype-dependent prognostic relevance of an interferon-induced pathway metagene in node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Maurizio Callari; Valeria Musella; Eleonora Di Buduo; Marialuisa Sensi; Patrizia Miodini; Matteo Dugo; Rosaria Orlandi; Roberto Agresti; Biagio Paolini; Maria Luisa Carcangiu; Vera Cappelletti; Maria Grazia Daidone
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 6.603

3.  TGFβ-Mediated induction of SphK1 as a potential determinant in human MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell bone metastasis.

Authors:  Keith R Stayrook; Justin K Mack; Donna Cerabona; Daniel F Edwards; Hai H Bui; Maria Niewolna; Pierrick Gj Fournier; Khalid S Mohammad; David L Waning; Theresa A Guise
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2015-07-08

4.  The therapeutic response of ER+/HER2- breast cancers differs according to the molecular Basal or Luminal subtype.

Authors:  François Bertucci; Pascal Finetti; Anthony Goncalves; Daniel Birnbaum
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-03-06

5.  Interpreting cancer biology: refining our therapeutic algorithm in breast cancer.

Authors:  Gabriel Hortobágyi; Pierfranco Conte
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013

Review 6.  Gene expression profiling: changing face of breast cancer classification and management.

Authors:  Robert Wesolowski; Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy
Journal:  Gene Expr       Date:  2011

7.  Targeting thyroid hormone receptor beta in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Guowei Gu; Luca Gelsomino; Kyle R Covington; Amanda R Beyer; John Wang; Yassine Rechoum; Kenneth Huffman; Ryan Carstens; Sebastiano Andò; Suzanne A W Fuqua
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Dual functions of the homeoprotein DLX4 in modulating responsiveness of tumor cells to topoisomerase II-targeting drugs.

Authors:  Bon Q Trinh; Song Yi Ko; Nicolas Barengo; Shiaw-Yih Lin; Honami Naora
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 9.  Breast cancer: Actual methods of treatment and future trends.

Authors:  Paweł Murawa; Dawid Murawa; Beata Adamczyk; Karol Połom
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-01-23

10.  TP53 mutation-correlated genes predict the risk of tumor relapse and identify MPS1 as a potential therapeutic kinase in TP53-mutated breast cancers.

Authors:  Balázs Győrffy; Giulia Bottai; Jacqueline Lehmann-Che; György Kéri; László Orfi; Takayuki Iwamoto; Christine Desmedt; Giampaolo Bianchini; Nicholas C Turner; Hugues de Thè; Fabrice André; Christos Sotiriou; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Angelo Di Leo; Lajos Pusztai; Libero Santarpia
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 6.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.