Literature DB >> 2119104

Computerized follow-up of abnormalities detected at mammography screening.

D L Monticciolo1, E A Sickles.   

Abstract

Obtaining follow-up information after abnormal interpretations is an important aspect of a mammography practice, but it can be tedious, time-consuming, and produce suboptimal results. This study demonstrates the effect of computer-generated reminders on the collection of follow-up data for patients in whom abnormalities were detected at mammography screening. From April 1985 until December 1987, follow-up data for 1009 abnormal examinations were collected by using standard procedures, supplemented by occasional searches of pathology records and sporadic letters and telephone calls to referring physicians. Results showed that follow-up was limited to a normal physical examination in 104 women (10.3%); eight other women (0.8%) were lost to follow-up. For over 90% of these inadequately followed cases, referring physicians were first contacted more than 3 months after screening. Since December 1987, follow-up data for 777 abnormal examinations were collected, supplemented by computer-generated reminders sent to referring physicians for cases apparently unresolved 3 months after screening. Only four (0.5%) of these women have had inadequate follow-up (normal physical examination alone). We conclude that use of a computer-generated reminder system prompts more timely and more appropriate patient management. It also makes follow-up data collection much less onerous.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2119104     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.155.4.2119104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  4 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to improve follow-up of abnormal findings in cancer screening.

Authors:  Roshan Bastani; K Robin Yabroff; Ronald E Myers; Beth Glenn
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Opinion: a prototype for a computerized national mammography registry and tracking system using telecommunications and the Internet.

Authors:  M S Frank
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Timing of follow-up after abnormal screening and diagnostic mammograms.

Authors:  Karen J Wernli; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Sebastien Haneuse; Joanne G Elmore; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  The ACR BI-RADS experience: learning from history.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Edward A Sickles; Lawrence W Bassett; Daniel L Rubin; Carol H Lee; Debra M Ikeda; Ellen B Mendelson; Pamela A Wilcox; Priscilla F Butler; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.532

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.