Literature DB >> 21190996

A randomized comparison of 4 courses of standard-dose multiagent chemotherapy versus 3 courses of high-dose cytarabine alone in postremission therapy for acute myeloid leukemia in adults: the JALSG AML201 Study.

Shuichi Miyawaki1, Shigeki Ohtake, Shin Fujisawa, Hitoshi Kiyoi, Katsuji Shinagawa, Noriko Usui, Toru Sakura, Koichi Miyamura, Chiaki Nakaseko, Yasushi Miyazaki, Atsushi Fujieda, Tadashi Nagai, Takahisa Yamane, Masafumi Taniwaki, Masatomo Takahashi, Fumiharu Yagasaki, Yukihiko Kimura, Norio Asou, Hisashi Sakamaki, Hiroshi Handa, Sumihisa Honda, Kazunori Ohnishi, Tomoki Naoe, Ryuzo Ohno.   

Abstract

We conducted a prospective randomized study to assess the optimal postremission therapy for adult acute myeloid leukemia in patients younger than 65 years in the first complete remission. A total of 781 patients in complete remission were randomly assigned to receive consolidation chemotherapy of either 3 courses of high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC, 2 g/m(2) twice daily for 5 days) alone or 4 courses of conventional standard-dose multiagent chemotherapy (CT) established in the previous JALSG AML97 study. Five-year disease-free survival was 43% for the HiDAC group and 39% for the multiagent CT group (P = .724), and 5-year overall survival was 58% and 56%, respectively (P = .954). Among the favorable cytogenetic risk group (n = 218), 5-year disease-free survival was 57% for HiDAC and 39% for multiagent CT (P = .050), and 5-year overall survival was 75% and 66%, respectively (P = .174). In the HiDAC group, the nadir of leukocyte counts was lower, and the duration of leukocyte less than 1.0 × 10(9)/L longer, and the frequency of documented infections higher. The present study demonstrated that the multiagent CT regimen is as effective as our HiDAC regimen for consolidation. Our HiDAC regimen resulted in a beneficial effect on disease-free survival only in the favorable cytogenetic leukemia group. This trial was registered at www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ as #C000000157.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21190996     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-07-295279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  53 in total

1.  Prognosis of patients with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia after first relapse.

Authors:  Saiko Kurosawa; Shuichi Miyawaki; Takuhiro Yamaguchi; Heiwa Kanamori; Toru Sakura; Yukiyoshi Moriuchi; Fumiaki Sano; Takeshi Kobayashi; Atsushi Yasumoto; Kazuo Hatanaka; Masamitsu Yanada; Yuichiro Nawa; Jin Takeuchi; Yukinori Nakamura; Shin Fujisawa; Hirohiko Shibayama; Ikuo Miura; Takahiro Fukuda
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 2.  Post-remission therapy for acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Richard F Schlenk
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Eltrombopag inhibits the proliferation of leukemia cells via reduction of intracellular iron and induction of differentiation.

Authors:  Michael Roth; Britta Will; Guillermo Simkin; Swathi Narayanagari; Laura Barreyro; Boris Bartholdy; Roni Tamari; Constantine S Mitsiades; Amit Verma; Ulrich Steidl
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 4.  Post-remission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: Are we ready for an individualized approach?

Authors:  Benjamin A Derman; Richard A Larson
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Haematol       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  [Acute myeloid leukemia].

Authors:  K Döhner; P Paschka; H Döhner
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 6.  Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel.

Authors:  Hartmut Döhner; Elihu Estey; David Grimwade; Sergio Amadori; Frederick R Appelbaum; Thomas Büchner; Hervé Dombret; Benjamin L Ebert; Pierre Fenaux; Richard A Larson; Ross L Levine; Francesco Lo-Coco; Tomoki Naoe; Dietger Niederwieser; Gert J Ossenkoppele; Miguel Sanz; Jorge Sierra; Martin S Tallman; Hwei-Fang Tien; Andrew H Wei; Bob Löwenberg; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Acute myeloid leukemia in clinical practice: a retrospective population-based cohort study in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan.

Authors:  Takuya Matsunaga; Kiyoshi Yamashita; Yoko Kubuki; Takanori Toyama; Osamu Imataki; Kouichi Maeda; Noriaki Kawano; Seiichi Satou; Hiroshi Kawano; Junzo Ishizaki; Shuro Yoshida; Takuro Kameda; Tadashi Sasaki; Masaaki Sekine; Ayako Kamiunten; Yasuhiro Taniguchi; Tomonori Hidaka; Keiko Katayose; Haruko K-Shimoda; Kotaro Shide; Shojiro Yamamoto; Hiroshi Moritake; Hiroyuki Nunoi; Shigeyoshi Makino; Akira Kitanaka; Hitoshi Matsuoka; Kazuya Shimoda
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 2.490

8.  Comparison of Mitoxantrone in Combination with Intermediate-dose Cytarabine versus High-dose Cytarabine as Consolidation Therapies for Young Non-APL Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients with Favorable and Intermediate Cytogenetics.

Authors:  Ji-Hao Zhou; Hai-Qing Lin; Qi Shen; Li-Na Hu; Guo-Qiang Li; Xiong-Fei Sun; Xin-You Zhang
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-15

9.  Multidimensional study of the heterogeneity of leukemia cells in t(8;21) acute myelogenous leukemia identifies the subtype with poor outcome.

Authors:  Lu Jiang; Xue-Ping Li; Yu-Ting Dai; Bing Chen; Xiang-Qin Weng; Shu-Min Xiong; Min Zhang; Jin-Yan Huang; Zhu Chen; Sai-Juan Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Treatment of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): a Canadian consensus.

Authors:  Joseph M Brandwein; Michelle Geddes; Jeannine Kassis; Andrea K Kew; Brian Leber; Thomas Nevill; Mitchell Sabloff; Irwindeep Sandhu; Andre C Schuh; John M Storring; John Ashkenas
Journal:  Am J Blood Res       Date:  2013-05-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.