Literature DB >> 21190952

Surveying ourselves: examining the use of a web-based approach for a physician survey.

Kristen A Matteson1, Britta L Anderson, Stephanie B Pinto, Vrishali Lopes, Jay Schulkin, Melissa A Clark.   

Abstract

A survey was distributed, using a sequential mixed-mode approach, to a national sample of obstetrician-gynecologists. Differences between responses to the web-based mode and the on-paper mode were compared to determine if there were systematic differences between respondents. Only two differences in respondents between the two modes were identified. University-based physicians were more likely to complete the web-based mode than private practice physicians. Mail respondents reported a greater volume of endometrial ablations compared to online respondents. The web-based mode had better data quality than the paper-based mailed mode in terms of less missing and inappropriate responses. Together, these findings suggest that, although a few differences were identified, the web-based survey mode attained adequate representativeness and improved data quality. Given the metrics examined for this study, exclusive use of web-based data collection may be appropriate for physician surveys with a minimal reduction in sample coverage and without a reduction in data quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21190952      PMCID: PMC3108008          DOI: 10.1177/0163278710391086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Health Prof        ISSN: 0163-2787            Impact factor:   2.651


  9 in total

1.  Internet and postal survey of endourologic practice patterns among American urologists.

Authors:  C M Hollowell; R V Patel; G T Bales; G S Gerber
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Use of new technology in endourology and laparoscopy by american urologists: internet and postal survey.

Authors:  H L Kim; C M Hollowell; R V Patel; G T Bales; R V Clayman; G S Gerber
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  When to use web-based surveys.

Authors:  J C Wyatt
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative?

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Jon Emery; Simon De Lusignan; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.267

5.  Physicians' Internet information-seeking behaviors.

Authors:  Nancy L Bennett; Linda L Casebeer; Robert E Kristofco; Sheryl M Strasser
Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 6.  Methodologies for improving response rates in surveys of physicians: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jonathan B VanGeest; Timothy P Johnson; Verna L Welch
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Combining web-based and mail surveys improves response rates: a PBRN study from PRIME Net.

Authors:  Philip J Kroth; Laurie McPherson; Robert Leverence; Wilson Pace; Elvan Daniels; Robert L Rhyne; Robert L Williams
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 8.  Practice trends in outpatient obstetrics and gynecology: findings of the Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network, 1995--2000.

Authors:  L D Hill; K Erickson; G B Holzman; M L Power; J Schulkin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.347

9.  Survey of doctors' experience of patients using the Internet.

Authors:  Henry W W Potts; Jeremy C Wyatt
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2002 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 5.428

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Combining Internet-Based and Postal Survey Methods in a Survey among Gynecologists: Results of a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Sinja Alexandra Ernst; Tilman Brand; Stefan K Lhachimi; Hajo Zeeb
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Practice patterns and attitudes about treating abnormal uterine bleeding: a national survey of obstetricians and gynecologists.

Authors:  Kristen A Matteson; Britta L Anderson; Stephanie B Pinto; Vrishali Lopes; Jay Schulkin; Melissa A Clark
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Institute of medicine 2009 gestational weight gain guideline knowledge: survey of obstetrics/gynecology and family medicine residents of the United States.

Authors:  Tiffany A Moore Simas; Molly E Waring; Gina M T Sullivan; Xun Liao; Milagros C Rosal; Janet R Hardy; Robert E Berry
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.689

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.