BACKGROUND: Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies are the cornerstone of preoperative evaluation of thyroid nodules, but FNA diagnostic performance has varied across different studies. In the course of collecting thyroid FNA specimens for the development of a molecular diagnostic test, local cytology and both local and expert panel surgical pathology results were reviewed. METHODS: Prospective FNAs were collected at 21 clinical sites. Banked FNAs were collected from two academic centers. Cytology and corresponding local and expert panel surgical pathology results were compared to each other and to a meta-review of 11 recently published U.S.-based thyroid FNA studies. RESULTS: FNA diagnostic performance was comparable between the study specimens and the meta-review. Histopathology malignancy rates for prospective clinic FNAs were 34% for cytology indeterminate cases and 98% for cytology malignant cases, comparable to the figures found in the meta-review (34% and 97%, respectively). However, histopathology malignancy rates were higher for cytology benign cases in the prospective clinic FNA subcohort (11%) than in the meta-review (6%, with meta-review rates of 10% at community sites and 2% at academic centers, p < 0.0001). Resection rates for prospective clinic FNAs were also comparable to the meta-review for both cytology indeterminate cases (62% vs. 59%, respectively) and cytology malignant cases (82% vs. 81%, respectively). Surgical pathology categorical disagreement (benign vs. malignant diagnosis) was higher between local pathology and a consensus of the two expert panelists (11%) than between the two expert panelists both pre- (8%) and postconferral (3%). CONCLUSIONS: Although recent guidelines for FNA biopsy and interpretation have been published, the rates of false-positive and false-negative results remain a challenge. Two-thirds of cytology indeterminate cases were benign postoperatively and may decrease with the development of an accurate molecular diagnostic test. High disagreement rates between local and expert panel histopathology diagnosis suggests that central review for surgical diagnoses should be used when developing diagnostic tests based on resected thyroid specimens.
BACKGROUND: Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies are the cornerstone of preoperative evaluation of thyroid nodules, but FNA diagnostic performance has varied across different studies. In the course of collecting thyroid FNA specimens for the development of a molecular diagnostic test, local cytology and both local and expert panel surgical pathology results were reviewed. METHODS: Prospective FNAs were collected at 21 clinical sites. Banked FNAs were collected from two academic centers. Cytology and corresponding local and expert panel surgical pathology results were compared to each other and to a meta-review of 11 recently published U.S.-based thyroid FNA studies. RESULTS: FNA diagnostic performance was comparable between the study specimens and the meta-review. Histopathology malignancy rates for prospective clinic FNAs were 34% for cytology indeterminate cases and 98% for cytology malignant cases, comparable to the figures found in the meta-review (34% and 97%, respectively). However, histopathology malignancy rates were higher for cytology benign cases in the prospective clinic FNA subcohort (11%) than in the meta-review (6%, with meta-review rates of 10% at community sites and 2% at academic centers, p < 0.0001). Resection rates for prospective clinic FNAs were also comparable to the meta-review for both cytology indeterminate cases (62% vs. 59%, respectively) and cytology malignant cases (82% vs. 81%, respectively). Surgical pathology categorical disagreement (benign vs. malignant diagnosis) was higher between local pathology and a consensus of the two expert panelists (11%) than between the two expert panelists both pre- (8%) and postconferral (3%). CONCLUSIONS: Although recent guidelines for FNA biopsy and interpretation have been published, the rates of false-positive and false-negative results remain a challenge. Two-thirds of cytology indeterminate cases were benign postoperatively and may decrease with the development of an accurate molecular diagnostic test. High disagreement rates between local and expert panel histopathology diagnosis suggests that central review for surgical diagnoses should be used when developing diagnostic tests based on resected thyroid specimens.
Authors: David S Cooper; Gerard M Doherty; Bryan R Haugen; Bryan R Hauger; Richard T Kloos; Stephanie L Lee; Susan J Mandel; Ernest L Mazzaferri; Bryan McIver; Furio Pacini; Martin Schlumberger; Steven I Sherman; David L Steward; R Michael Tuttle Journal: Thyroid Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Constantine G A Theoharis; Kevin M Schofield; Lynwood Hammers; Robert Udelsman; David C Chhieng Journal: Thyroid Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Ricardo V Lloyd; Lori A Erickson; Mary B Casey; King Y Lam; Christine M Lohse; Sylvia L Asa; John K C Chan; Ronald A DeLellis; H Ruben Harach; Kennichi Kakudo; Virginia A LiVolsi; Juan Rosai; Thomas J Sebo; Manuel Sobrinho-Simoes; Bruce M Wenig; Marick E Lae Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Anil K D'Cruz; Richa Vaish; Abhishek Vaidya; Iain J Nixon; Michelle D Williams; Vincent Vander Poorten; Fernando López; Peter Angelos; Ashok R Shaha; Avi Khafif; Alena Skalova; Alessandra Rinaldo; Jennifer L Hunt; Alfio Ferlito Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Kepal N Patel; Trevor E Angell; Joshua Babiarz; Neil M Barth; Thomas Blevins; Quan-Yang Duh; Ronald A Ghossein; R Mack Harrell; Jing Huang; Giulia C Kennedy; Su Yeon Kim; Richard T Kloos; Virginia A LiVolsi; Gregory W Randolph; Peter M Sadow; Michael H Shanik; Julie A Sosa; S Thomas Traweek; P Sean Walsh; Duncan Whitney; Michael W Yeh; Paul W Ladenson Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Jithma Prasad Abeykoon; Luke Mueller; Frank Dong; Ashish V Chintakuntlawar; Jonas Paludo; Rami Mortada Journal: Horm Cancer Date: 2016-04-21 Impact factor: 3.869
Authors: Henning Dralle; Thomas J Musholt; Jochen Schabram; Thomas Steinmüller; Andreja Frilling; Dietmar Simon; Peter E Goretzki; Bruno Niederle; Christian Scheuba; Thomas Clerici; Michael Hermann; Jochen Kußmann; Kerstin Lorenz; Christoph Nies; Peter Schabram; Arnold Trupka; Andreas Zielke; Wolfram Karges; Markus Luster; Kurt W Schmid; Dirk Vordermark; Hans-Joachim Schmoll; Reinhard Mühlenberg; Otmar Schober; Harald Rimmele; Andreas Machens Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2013-03-03 Impact factor: 3.445