Literature DB >> 21190031

Biomechanical effect of different interspinous devices on lumbar spinal range of motion under preload conditions.

Frank Hartmann1, Sven-Oliver Dietz, Hans Hely, Pol Maria Rommens, Erol Gercek.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Interspinous devices are used as an alternative to the current gold standard treatment, decompressive surgery with or without fusion, for lumbar spinal stenosis. They are supposed to limit extension and expand the spinal canal and foramen at the symptomatic level, but still allow lateral bending and axial rotation in the motion segment. The aim of the present study is the biomechanical evaluation of the change in the range of motion of the affected and adjacent segments following implantation of different interspinous devices under load in all directions of motion.
METHOD: Eight fresh frozen human cadaver lumbar spines (L2-L5) were tested in a spinal testing device with a moment of 7.5 nm in flexion/extension, lateral bending and rotation with and without a preload (follower load of 400 N). The ROM was measured after implantation of Aperius (Kyphon, Mannheim), In-Space (Synthes, Umkirch), X-Stop (Tikom, Fürth) and Coflex (Paradigm Spine, Wurmlingen) into the segment L3/L4.
RESULTS: All interspinous devices caused a significant reduction in extension of the instrumented segment without significantly affecting the other directions of motion. The flexion was reduced by all implants only when the follower load was applied. All devices caused a higher ROM of the whole spine during lateral bending and rotation.
CONCLUSION: The actual evaluated interspinous devices led to a significant reduction in ROM during flexion-extension, but to a significant increase in ROM for the whole specimen (L2-L5) during lateral bending and rotation, which could increase the risk of adjacent segment degeneration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21190031     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-010-1235-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  9 in total

Review 1.  Aperius interspinous device for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a review.

Authors:  Ashwanth Ramesh; Frank Lyons; Michael Kelleher
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Lumbar lateral shift in a patient with interspinous device implantation: a case report.

Authors:  Seth Peterson; Cheri Hodges
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2016-09

3.  A review of interspinous fusion devices: High complication, reoperation rates, and costs with poor outcomes.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-01-21

4.  The current testing protocols for biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spinal implants in laboratory setting: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Sabrina A Gonzalez-Blohm; James J Doulgeris; William E Lee; Thomas M Shea; Kamran Aghayev; Frank D Vrionis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effect of coflex™ on the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Dong-Hak Byun; Dong Ah Shin; Jin-Myung Kim; So-Hee Kim; Hyoung-Ihl Kim
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2012-09-30

Review 6.  Biomechanics of interspinous devices.

Authors:  Paolo D Parchi; Gisberto Evangelisti; Antonella Vertuccio; Nicola Piolanti; Lorenzo Andreani; Valentina Cervi; Christian Giannetti; Giuseppe Calvosa; Michele Lisanti
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  A Novel Nonpedicular Screw-Based Fixation in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Ming-Hong Chen; Jen-Yuh Chen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Effect of different designs of interspinous process devices on the instrumented and adjacent levels after double-level lumbar decompression surgery: A finite element analysis.

Authors:  Hao-Ju Lo; Hung-Ming Chen; Yi-Jie Kuo; Sai-Wei Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Optimization of a lumbar interspinous fixation device for the lumbar spine with degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Minhyeok Heo; Jihwan Yun; Hanjong Kim; Sang-Soo Lee; Seonghun Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.