Literature DB >> 21189760

Comparative evaluation of bactericidal potential of four root canal filling materials against microflora of infected non-vital primary teeth.

M Harini Priya1, Sham S Bhat, K Sundeep Hegde.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Since complete debridement of the root canals of the primary teeth is not practically possible due to the highly variable root canal anatomy, success of the endodontic therapy depends partly on the use ofantibacterial irrigating agents and root canal filling materials. Recent literature indicates that anaerobes comprise a majority of the bacteria in necrotic root canals ofprimary teeth. The study determined the antibacterial effectiveness of four root canal filling materials namely Calcium hydroxide, Zinc oxide eugenol, Vitapex and Metapex against microbial specimens obtained directly from necrotic root canals of primary teeth.
METHOD: Microbial specimens were collected using sterile paper points, from 15 primary maxillary and mandibular posterior teeth of randomly selected children in the age group of 4-10 years with infected non vital primary teeth, requiring pulpectomy procedure. The microbial specimens collected were subjected to microbiological analysis and the antimicrobial potential of root canal filling materials were tested using Agar diffusion technique.
RESULTS: were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Facultative/Aerobic organisms were isolated in all the cases, anaerobic organisms were isolated in 80% of the cases, and Candida albicans was isolated in 1 case. ZOE showed superior inhibitory activity against most of the organisms isolated followed by Vitapex, Calcium hydroxide and Metapex in descending order.
CONCLUSION: Our data may be useful as a guide for relative antimicrobial effectiveness or non-effectiveness of the materials employed. In vivo studies are required to state the specific antimicrobial activity and merits and demerits of any of the test filling material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21189760     DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.35.1.u57p4500360g2752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pediatr Dent        ISSN: 1053-4628            Impact factor:   1.065


  4 in total

1.  Comparative Evaluation of Antifungal Efficacy of Five Root Canal Sealers against Clinical Isolates of Candida albicans: A Microbiological Study.

Authors:  Sameep Singh; Binita Srivastava; Khyati Gupta; Nidhi Gupta; Rashi Singh; Satyavir Singh
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr

2.  Comparative study of pulpal responses to ProRoot MTA, Vitapex, and Metapex in canine teeth.

Authors:  Woojin Kwon; Ik-Hwan Kim; Chung-Min Kang; Byurira Kim; Yooseok Shin; Je Seon Song
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 2.080

3.  Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpectomy in primary teeth: a 18-months clinical randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Xiaoxian Chen; Xinggang Liu; Jie Zhong
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 2.151

4.  Antibacterial Effects of Chitosan, Formocresol and CMCP as Pulpectomy Medicament on Enterococcusfaecalis, Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcusmutans.

Authors:  Zhila Imani; Zahra Imani; Leila Basir; Mohsen Shayeste; Effat Abbasi Montazeri; Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2018
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.