Literature DB >> 21189695

Validity of quantitative unspun urine microscopy, dipstick test leucocyte esterase and nitrite tests in rapidly diagnosing urinary tract infections.

N Taneja1, S S Chatterjee, M Singh, S Sivapriya, M Sharma, S K Sharma.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Rapid diagnostic tests can screen out negative samples and can save valuable time and money. The study was conducted to assess the usefulness of leukocyte esterase, nitrate reductase and quantitative microscopic unspun urine wet mount examination in rapidly diagnosing urinary tract infections (UTI).
METHODS: Four hundred and fifty samples were tested by semi-quantitative culture on cysteine lactose electrolyte deficient medium, microscopic examination of unspun urine for significant pyuria, dipstick leucocyte esterase test (LET) and nitrite test (NT). Culture was used as gold standard to evaluate the performance of direct microscopy and dipstick tests.
RESULTS: Urine culture examination revealed significant bacteriuria (>10(5) cfu/ml) 98 (21.8%), in urine samples. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of the dip-stick LET were 73.5%, 58.5%, 33.0%, 88.8%, and 3.9 respectively; those of the dip-stick NT were 57.1%, 78.7%, 42.7%, 86.8%, and 4.9 respectively; and those for microscopic significant pyuria detection were 68.4%, 60.8%, 32.7%, 87.3%, and 3.4 respectively. Highest sensitivity (95.9%), NPV (97.9%) and DOR (25.7) was obtained on combining microscopy and dip-stick LET and NT (either of them positive). This can potentially cut costs by 79%.
CONCLUSION: Quantitative unspun urine wet mount microscopy and dipstick tests for leucocyte esterase and nitrite test should be added into routine laboratory practices for faster diagnosis of UTI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21189695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Physicians India        ISSN: 0004-5772


  6 in total

1.  Reliability of dipstick assay in predicting urinary tract infection.

Authors:  Anith Kumar Mambatta; Jayalakshmi Jayarajan; Vinitha L Rashme; Sanchitha Harini; Sujaya Menon; Jayachandran Kuppusamy
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

2.  Performance of urinalysis tests in screening for significant bacteriuria among human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects in South India.

Authors:  Ramachandran Vignesh; Chinnambedu R Swathirajan; Sunil S Solomon; Suniti Solomon; Pachamuthu Balakrishnan
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 1.852

3.  Prevalence of Portable Point of Care Tests Used on Medical Service Trips in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Authors:  Christopher Dainton; Nikki Shah; Charlene H Chu
Journal:  Ann Glob Health       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 2.462

4.  Can urine dipstick test be an alternative to detect urinary tract infection in limited resource setting? - A validity study from Bangalore, India.

Authors:  Abilash J Bhansali; Leeberk R Inbaraj; Carolin E George; Gift Norman
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-02-28

5.  Reevaluating the true diagnostic accuracy of dipstick tests to diagnose urinary tract infection using Bayesian latent class analysis.

Authors:  Prashant Bafna; Surendran Deepanjali; Jharna Mandal; Nathan Balamurugan; Rathinam P Swaminathan; Tamilarasu Kadhiravan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Treatment of uncomplicated symptomatic urinary tract infections: Resistance patterns and misuse of antibiotics.

Authors:  Carolin Elizabeth George; Gift Norman; G Venkata Ramana; Devashri Mukherjee; Tata Rao
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.