Literature DB >> 21189052

The perceived angle of the round window affects electrode insertion trauma in round window insertion - an anatomical study.

Yisgav Shapira1, Adrien A Eshraghi, Thomas J Balkany.   

Abstract

CONCLUSION: In this study round window (RW) insertion of cochlear implant was performed with a lower degree of trauma in 86.6% of cases. Therefore RW insertion is a valid option to be considered in selected cochlear implant patients, especially when hearing preservation is a goal. In most cases drilling of the overhangs is required.
OBJECTIVES: To systematically examine the potential for minimizing electrode insertion trauma with RW insertion.
METHODS: Fifteen temporal bones were inserted with a 0.5 mm electrode analog in an anterior or antero-inferior vector from a reference point along the facial recess. Surface preparation of the inferior segment of the basal turn was performed and the point of first contact was analyzed using computerized morphometric software. The same software was used to measure the RW dimensions before and after drill down of the bony overhangs. An insertion was considered 'traumatic' if the point of first contact was the medial wall of the scala, whereas 'less traumatic' was an insertion in which the point of first contact was the inferior or posterior wall of the scala.
RESULTS: Less traumatic insertion was achieved in 13 of the 15 bones, and in these the mean RW angle, as observed from a surgical point of view, was 137°. The mean RW angle in the traumatic insertion group was 147°. The difference was statistically significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21189052     DOI: 10.3109/00016489.2010.533698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  8 in total

1.  Impact of Intrascalar Electrode Location, Electrode Type, and Angular Insertion Depth on Residual Hearing in Cochlear Implant Patients: Preliminary Results.

Authors:  George B Wanna; Jack H Noble; Rene H Gifford; Mary S Dietrich; Alex D Sweeney; Dongqing Zhang; Benoit M Dawant; Alejandro Rivas; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Impact of the round window membrane accessibility on hearing preservation in adult cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Marjan Mirsalehi; Saleh Mohebbi; Mahsa Ghajarzadeh; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Evaluation of round window accessibility to cochlear implant insertion.

Authors:  Annabelle C Leong; Dan Jiang; Andreas Agger; Alec Fitzgerald-O'Connor
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  The construct validity and reliability of an assessment tool for competency in cochlear implant surgery.

Authors:  Patorn Piromchai; Pornthep Kasemsiri; Sudanthi Wijewickrema; Ioanna Ioannou; Gregor Kennedy; Stephen O'Leary
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  An In-Vitro Insertion-Force Study of Magnetically Guided Lateral-Wall Cochlear-Implant Electrode Arrays.

Authors:  Lisandro Leon; Frank M Warren; Jake J Abbott
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Radiologic anatomy of the round window relevant to cochlear implantation and inner ear drug delivery.

Authors:  Peter L Nguy; Sheela Saidha; Ann Jay; H Jeffrey Kim; Michael Hoa
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-06-20

7.  Radiologic Evaluation of the Round Window Niche Configuration: A One-Stop Approach.

Authors:  Badr Eldin Mostafa; Lobna M El Fiky
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.017

8.  Evaluation of Intracochlear Trauma Caused by Insertion of Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays through Different Quadrants of the Round Window.

Authors:  Graziela de Souza Queiroz Martins; Rubens Vuono Brito Neto; Robinson Koji Tsuji; Eloisa Maria Mello Santiago Gebrim; Ricardo Ferreira Bento
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.