Literature DB >> 21188960

Intraocular pressure during corneal flap preparation: comparison among four femtosecond lasers in porcine eyes.

Jan M Vetter1, Mike P Holzer, Christian Teping, Wolf E Weingärtner, Adrian Gericke, Bernhard Stoffelns, Norbert Pfeiffer, Walter Sekundo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the course of intraocular pressure (IOP) during corneal flap preparation using four different femtosecond lasers in porcine globes.
METHODS: Forty-eight (12 in each group) enucleated globes were successfully cannulated through the optic nerve. Intraocular pressure was measured continuously through the cannula during a normal lamellar flap creation (regular procedure) using four femtosecond lasers (IntraLase, Abbott Medical Optics; VisuMax, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG; Femtec, Technolas Perfect Vision; and Femto LDV, Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG). In an additional measurement (worst-case procedure), the patient interface was pressed against the globe with increasing force until the applanation maneuver was automatically aborted by those devices capable of doing so.
RESULTS: During the regular procedure, the maximum IOP reached was 135±16 mmHg when using the Intra-Lase, 65±20 mmHg with the VisuMax, 205±32 mmHg with the Femtec, and 184±28 mmHg with the Femto LDV. During the worst-case procedure, a maximum IOP of 260±53 mmHg was reached with the IntraLase, 105±13 mmHg with the VisuMax, and 248±51 mmHg with the Femtec.
CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable variation in IOP among the tested femtosecond lasers during a regular lamellar flap creation and during the worst-case procedure. The VisuMax femtosecond laser seems to cause the lowest IOP rise in both settings. Copyright 2011, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21188960     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20101210-01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  18 in total

1.  [Prophylaxis and management of complications in penetrating keratoplasty].

Authors:  B Seitz; M El-Husseiny; A Langenbucher; N Szentmáry
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  Femtosecond laser in refractive and cataract surgeries.

Authors:  Han-Han Liu; Ying Hu; Hong-Ping Cui
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  [LenSx® femto-LASIK, FEMTO LDV Z4® femto-LASIK, and PRK : Comparison of refractive results and an analysis of complications].

Authors:  T Pahlitzsch; M-L Pahlitzsch; U Sumarni; M Pahlitzsch
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  FS200 femtosecond laser LASIK flap digital analysis parameter evaluation: comparing two different types of patient interface applanation cones.

Authors:  A John Kanellopoulos; George Asimellis
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-10

5.  Myopic LASIK Outcomes: Comparison of Three Different Femtosecond Lasers and a Mechanical Microkeratome Using the Same Excimer Laser.

Authors:  Juan Gros-Otero; Isabel Rodríguez-Pérez; Miguel A Teus; Andreas Katsanos; Dimitrios G Mikropoulos; Montserrat García-González
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2022-03-09

6.  Comparison of intra-ocular pressure changes with liquid or flat applanation interfaces in a femtosecond laser platform.

Authors:  G P Williams; H P Ang; B L George; Y C Liu; G Peh; L Izquierdo; D T Tan; J S Mehta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  A Comparison of Different Operating Systems for Femtosecond Lasers in Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  B M Wu; G P Williams; A Tan; J S Mehta
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 8.  Advances in refractive corneal lenticule extraction.

Authors:  Matthias Fuest; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-24

9.  A refractive surgery candidate with optic nerve head cupping.

Authors:  Ivan Goldberg; L Jay Katz; Kaweh Mansouri; Mohammad Pakravan; Shahin Yazdani
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2012-07

Review 10.  Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) history, fundamentals of a new refractive surgery technique and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Dan Z Reinstein; Timothy J Archer; Marine Gobbe
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2014-10-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.