| Literature DB >> 21188084 |
Peng Zhou1, Xinchun Yang, Cuilan Li, Ying Gao, Dayi Hu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND#ENTITYSTARTX02014;: Electrical heterogeneity of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) is regarded as one of the main electrophysiological substrates for Brugada syndrome. Recently quinidine has shown efficacy in patients with Brugada syndrome due to its ability to inhibit potassium current especially 4-aminopyridine-sensitive, non-Ca(2+) -dependent transient outward potassium current (Ito). However, much less is known on how extent quinidine in clinical therapeutic concentration range can inhibit this kind of electrical heterogeneity of RVOT Ito. METHODS AND RESULTS#ENTITYSTARTX02014;: Single RVOT free wall epicardial (Epi) cell, midmyocardial (M) cell and endocarcial (Endo) cells were used for whole-cell voltage clamping and Ito was recorded at 37°C, 0.2 Hz depolarization pulse. Evident Ito tranmural heterogeneity existed in RVOT free wall. Under the condition of baseline, of 10 μM quinidine perfusion 5 minutes (mins), and of 10 μM quinidine perfusion 7-10 mins, from 0 mV to 70 mV the whole transmural average Ito values of RVOT free wall were 10.2 pA/pF, 5.5 pA/pF and 3.5 pA/pF, respectively (between groups, P< 0.01). The inhibitory percentage of 10 μM quinidine at 5 mins and 7-10 mins steady-state level on the the whole Ito transmural heterogeneity of RVOT free wall were 46.3%±6% and 66.5%±11%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS#ENTITYSTARTX02014;: There exists a robust Ito transmural electrical heterogeneity in RVOT free wall and quinidine in clinical therapeutic concentration can depress this kind of heterogeneity effectively.Entities:
Keywords: Brugada syndrome; arrhythmia; idiopathic ventricular fibrillation; quinidine; transient outward potassium current
Year: 2010 PMID: 21188084 PMCID: PMC3004164 DOI: 10.4103/0975-3583.59979
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Dis Res ISSN: 0975-3583
Figure 1Typical Ito raw traces of three layer cells from RVOT free wall
Figure 5Steady-state inactivation curve of Epi cells before and after 10 μM quinidine 5mins
Figure 2Ito I-V relationship of three layer cells from RVOT free wall
Figure 4I-V relationship of a typical example of 10 μM quinidine on the same typical Epi cell Ito
Figure 6ABaseline RVOT Free Wall Ito Transmural Electrical Heterogeneity 3-Dimension Figure Simulated by SPSS 11.5: X axis stands for test potential; Y axis stands for Ito density; Z axis stands for three layer cells; The height of pink cones stands for Ito density of each cell types at different test potential; The green plane stands for the whole transmural average Ito values of RVOT free wall; The yellow bent smooth plane stands for the whole transmural Ito gradient of RVOT free wall.
Three type cells of RVOT free wall Ito density (pA/pF) at 0 mV and 70 mV depolarization pulses
| Cell Types | Test Potential (mV) | |
|---|---|---|
| 0 mV | 70 mV | |
| Epi Cells (n=14) | 7.3±1.3 | 31.7±4.1 |
| M Cells (n=14) | 5.4±1.1 | 23.4±3.6 |
| Endo Cells (n=12) | 1.9±0.16 | 4.4±1.8 |
Values are mean±SEM;
P<0.05, Epi Cells vs. M Cells;
P<0.01, Epi Cells vs. Endo Cells;
P<0.01, M Cells vs. Endo Cells.
Figure 3A typical example of 10 μM quinidine on the same typical Epi cell Ito
After perfusion 5mins and 7–10mins, the voltage dependent inhibItory effect of 10 μM quinidine on RVOT free wall Ito (pA/pF)
| Cell Types | 0mV | 70mV | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 5mins | 7–10mins | Baseline | 5mins | 7–10mins | |
| Epi Cells | 7.3±1.3 | 5.5±1.1 | 4.4±0.87 | 31.7±4.1 | 17.4±2.4 | 13.3±1.9 |
| M Cells | 5.4±1.1 | 4.1±0.73 | 3.2±0.69 | 23.4±3.6 | 12.9±2.2 | 9.8±1.7 |
| Endo Cells | 1.9±0.16 | 1.4±0.13 | 0.87±0.1 | 4.4±1.8 | 3.2±1.4 | 2.4±1.1 |
Values are mean±SEM;
P<0.05, 10 μM quinidine 5 mins vs. Baseline;
P<0.01, quinidine 5 mins vs. Baseline;
P<0.05, 10 μM quinidine 5 mins vs. Baseline;
P<0.01, quinidine 5 mins vs. Baseline;
P<0.01, quinidine 5 mins vs. Baseline;
P<0.05, 10 μM quinidine 5 mins vs. Baseline;
P<0.01, quinidine 7–10 mins vs. Baseline;
P<0.01, quinidine 7–10 mins vs. Baseline.
P<0.01, quinidine 7–10 mins vs. Baseline;
P<0.01, quinidine 7–10 mins vs. Baseline.
P<0.01, quinidine 7–10 mins vs. Baseline;
P<0.01, quinidine 7–10 mins vs. Baseline.
Figure 6BAfter 10 μM quinidine perfusion 5mins
Figure 6CAfter 10 μM quinidine perfusion 7–10mins