| Literature DB >> 21187944 |
Carlos Torres-Torres1, Néstor Peréa-López, Jorge Alejandro Reyes-Esqueda, Luis Rodríguez-Fernández, Alejandro Crespo-Sosa, Juan Carlos Cheang-Wong, Alicia Oliver.
Abstract
The optical damage associated with high intensity laser excitation of silver nanoparticles (NPs) was studied. In order to investigate the mechanisms of optical nonlinearity of a nanocomposite and their relation with its ablation threshold, a high-purity silica sample implanted with Ag ions was exposed to different nanosecond and picosecond laser irradiations. The magnitude and sign of picosecond refractive and absorptive nonlinearities were measured near and far from the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) of the Ag NPs with a self-diffraction technique. Saturable optical absorption and electronic polarization related to self-focusing were identified. Linear absorption is the main process involved in nanosecond laser ablation, but non-linearities are important for ultrashort picosecond pulses when the absorptive process become significantly dependent on the irradiance. We estimated that near the resonance, picosecond intraband transitions allow an expanded distribution of energy among the NPs, in comparison to the energy distribution resulting in a case of far from resonance, when the most important absorption takes place in silica. We measured important differences in the ablation threshold and we estimated that the high selectiveness of the SPR of Ag NPs as well as their corresponding optical nonlinearities can be strongly significant for laser-induced controlled explosions, with potential applications for biomedical photothermal processes.Entities:
Keywords: Kerr effect; laser irradiation; metallic nanoparticles; nonlinear optical absorption; nonlinear optics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21187944 PMCID: PMC3010154 DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S12463
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Nanomedicine ISSN: 1176-9114
Figure 1Experimental setup for nonlinear measurements. L represents the lenses of the system, BM is a beam splitter, M1–M3 are mirrors, S is the sample, and PD1–PD4 are photodetectors with integrated filters.
Figure 2Experimental ablation setup. L represents the focusing system of lens, BM a beam splitter, S is the sample, and PDref is a reference photodetector with integrated filters.
Figure 3Self-diffraction efficiency at 355 nm and at 532 nm.
Optical nonlinearities exhibited by the sample
| Experiment | α (m−1) | β (m/W) | n2 (m2/W) | |χ(3)| (m2/W) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 355 nm, near the resonance | 1.5 × 102 | −9.5 × 10−10 | 1.6 × 10−17 | 4.64 × 10−17 |
| 532 nm, far from the resonance | 20 | −1 × 10−11 | 2 × 10−17 | 2.97 × 10−17 |
Figure 4Linear absorption spectra after laser irradiation at different pulse durations and different wavelengths.
Ablation results
| Single pulse experiment | 40 ns | 13 ns | 7 ns | 26 ps | 26 ps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ablation threshold (J/cm2) | 0.75 | 1.90 | 2.82 | 3.96 | 1.13 |