OBJECTIVES: Brain death impairs organ function and outcome after transplantation. There is a need for a brain death model to allow studies of organ viability and preservation. For neurointensive care research, it is also of interest to have a relevant brain death model for studies of intracranial dynamics and evaluation of cerebral monitoring devices. Therefore, the objective was to develop a standardized clinically relevant brain death model. METHODS: Six pigs of both sexes (10-12 wks old; mean weight, 24.5±1.4 kg) were included. Mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, intracranial pressure, intracranial compliance, cerebral perfusion pressure, and brain tissue oxygenation (BtiPo2) were recorded during stepwise elevation of intracranial pressure by inflation of an epidural balloon catheter with saline (1 mL/20 mins). Brain death criteria were decided to be reached when cerebral perfusion pressure was <0 mm Hg for 60 mins and at least 10 mL saline was inflated epidurally. BtiPo2 and arterial injections of microspheres were used for confirmation of brain death. RESULTS: A gradual volume-dependent elevation of intracranial pressure was observed. After 10 mL of balloon infusion, mean intracranial pressure was 89.8±9.7 (sd) mm Hg. Intracranial compliance decreased from 0.137±0.069 mL/mm Hg to 0.007±0.001 mL/mm Hg. The mean arterial pressure decreased and the heart rate increased when the intracranial volume was increased to between 5 and 6 mL. All animals showed cerebral perfusion pressure≤0 after 7 to 10 mL of infusion. In all animals, the criteria for brain death with negative cerebral perfusion pressure and BtiPo2 ∼0 mm Hg were achieved. Only a negligible amount of microspheres were found in the cerebrum, confirming brain death. The kidneys showed small foci of acute tubular necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: The standardized brain death model designed in pigs simulates the clinical development of brain death in humans with a classic pressure-volume response and systemic cardiovascular reactions. Brain death was convincingly confirmed.
OBJECTIVES:Brain death impairs organ function and outcome after transplantation. There is a need for a brain death model to allow studies of organ viability and preservation. For neurointensive care research, it is also of interest to have a relevant brain death model for studies of intracranial dynamics and evaluation of cerebral monitoring devices. Therefore, the objective was to develop a standardized clinically relevant brain death model. METHODS: Six pigs of both sexes (10-12 wks old; mean weight, 24.5±1.4 kg) were included. Mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, intracranial pressure, intracranial compliance, cerebral perfusion pressure, and brain tissue oxygenation (BtiPo2) were recorded during stepwise elevation of intracranial pressure by inflation of an epidural balloon catheter with saline (1 mL/20 mins). Brain death criteria were decided to be reached when cerebral perfusion pressure was <0 mm Hg for 60 mins and at least 10 mL saline was inflated epidurally. BtiPo2 and arterial injections of microspheres were used for confirmation of brain death. RESULTS: A gradual volume-dependent elevation of intracranial pressure was observed. After 10 mL of balloon infusion, mean intracranial pressure was 89.8±9.7 (sd) mm Hg. Intracranial compliance decreased from 0.137±0.069 mL/mm Hg to 0.007±0.001 mL/mm Hg. The mean arterial pressure decreased and the heart rate increased when the intracranial volume was increased to between 5 and 6 mL. All animals showed cerebral perfusion pressure≤0 after 7 to 10 mL of infusion. In all animals, the criteria for brain death with negative cerebral perfusion pressure and BtiPo2 ∼0 mm Hg were achieved. Only a negligible amount of microspheres were found in the cerebrum, confirming brain death. The kidneys showed small foci of acute tubular necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: The standardized brain death model designed in pigs simulates the clinical development of brain death in humans with a classic pressure-volume response and systemic cardiovascular reactions. Brain death was convincingly confirmed.
Authors: Lirong Yan; Collin Y Liu; Robert X Smith; Mayank Jog; Michael Langham; Kate Krasileva; Yufen Chen; John M Ringman; Danny J J Wang Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2015-09-10 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Krasimira M Mikhova; Creighton W Don; Michael Laflamme; John A Kellum; Michael S Mulligan; Edward D Verrier; David G Rabkin Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2012-11-03 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Karin Skoglund; Lars Hillered; Karlis Purins; Parmenion P Tsitsopoulos; Johanna Flygt; Henrik Engquist; Anders Lewén; Per Enblad; Niklas Marklund Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Dominik Michalski; Christopher Weise; Carsten Hobohm; Lea Küppers-Tiedt; Johann Pelz; Dietmar Schneider; Johannes Kacza; Wolfgang Härtig Journal: Exp Transl Stroke Med Date: 2012-07-13
Authors: Lars Hillered; Andreas P Dahlin; Fredrik Clausen; Jiangtao Chu; Jonas Bergquist; Klas Hjort; Per Enblad; Anders Lewén Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2014-12-03 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Franco Valenza; Silvia Coppola; Sara Froio; Giulia Maria Ruggeri; Jacopo Fumagalli; Alessandro Maria Villa; Lorenzo Rosso; Paolo Mendogni; Grazia Conte; Caterina Lonati; Andrea Carlin; Patrizia Leonardi; Stefano Gatti; Nino Stocchetti; Luciano Gattinoni Journal: Intensive Care Med Exp Date: 2014-06-10
Authors: Sofia Nordling; Johan Brännström; Fredrik Carlsson; Bo Lu; Evelyn Salvaris; Alkwin Wanders; Jos Buijs; Sergio Estrada; Vladimir Tolmachev; Peter J Cowan; Tomas Lorant; Peetra U Magnusson Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-03-26 Impact factor: 4.379