Literature DB >> 21187691

Diagnostic performance of ADC for Non-mass-like breast lesions on MR imaging.

Tsugumi Imamura1, Ichiro Isomoto, Eijun Sueyoshi, Hiroshi Yano, Tatsuya Uga, Kuniko Abe, Tomayoshi Hayashi, Sumihisa Honda, Takuma Yamaguchi, Masataka Uetani.   

Abstract

We assessed the usefulness and limitations of utilizing apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant non-mass-like breast lesions. We retrospectively reviewed 27 such lesions (16 malignant, 11 benign) detected on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and analyzed the enhancing patterns of dynamic contrast-enhanced DCE-MRI (distribution and internal enhancement), kinetic curve patterns, and ADC values. All images were obtained with a 1.5-tesla MR unit, with patients supine. On DCE-MRI, malignant lesions tended to show either segmental or branching-ductal distribution, and when lesions with these patterns were considered malignant, sensitivity was 68.8%; specificity, 63.6%; positive predictive value (PPV), 73.3%; negative predictive value (NPV), 58.3%; and accuracy, 66.7%. Kinetic curve analysis did not reliably differentiate benign and malignant non-mass-like lesions. There was no significant difference between the mean ADC value of the malignant lesions, 0.968 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s at b=1000 s/mm(2), and that of benign lesions, 1.207 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s (P=0.109). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed the most effective threshold of ADC value for differentiating tumors as 1.1 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s; values lower than this were observed more often in malignant than benign lesions (P=0.054). Us of this threshold yielded sensitivity of 68.8%; specificity, 72.7%; PPV, 78.6%; NPV, 61.5%; and accuracy, 70.4%. Combining the ADC value criteria with the analysis of DCE-MRI pattern increased sensitivity to 93.8%, negative predictive value (NPV) to 85.7%, and accuracy to 77.8% but decreased specificity to 54.5%. Use of ADC values does not adequately improve DCE-MRI performance for differential diagnosis of non-mass-like breast lesions, but adding the ADC value criteria to the DCE-MRI pattern analysis improves sensitivity, NPV, and accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21187691     DOI: 10.2463/mrms.9.217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci        ISSN: 1347-3182            Impact factor:   2.471


  28 in total

1.  (1)H MR spectroscopy with external reference solution at 1.5 T for differentiating malignant and benign breast lesions: comparison using qualitative and quantitative approaches.

Authors:  Waka Mizukoshi; Eito Kozawa; Kaiji Inoue; Naoko Saito; Naoko Nishi; Toshiaki Saeki; Fumiko Kimura
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Differential diagnosis of axillary inflammatory and metastatic lymph nodes in rabbit models by using diffusion-weighted imaging: compared with conventional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Junping Wang; Qian Liao; Yunting Zhang; Chunshui Yu; Renju Bai; Haoran Sun
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Detection of invasive components in cases of breast ductal carcinoma in situ on biopsy by using apparent diffusion coefficient MR parameters.

Authors:  Naoko Mori; Hideki Ota; Shunji Mugikura; Chiaki Takasawa; Junya Tominaga; Takanori Ishida; Mika Watanabe; Kei Takase; Shoki Takahashi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Diffusion-tensor imaging as an adjunct to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for improved accuracy of differential diagnosis between breast ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Yuan Wang; Xiaopeng Zhang; Kun Cao; Yanling Li; Xiaoting Li; Liping Qi; Lei Tang; Zhilong Wang; Shunyu Gao
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.087

5.  Optimization of apparent diffusion coefficient measured by diffusion-weighted MRI for diagnosis of breast lesions presenting as mass and non-mass-like enhancement.

Authors:  Liuquan Cheng; Yuhan Bai; Jing Zhang; Mei Liu; Xiru Li; Ailiang Zhang; Xiaojing Zhang; Lin Ma
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-02-10

Review 6.  Effect of b value and pre-admission of contrast on diagnostic accuracy of 1.5-T breast DWI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Monique D Dorrius; Hildebrand Dijkstra; Matthijs Oudkerk; Paul E Sijens
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  [Diffusion-weighted breast imaging. Clinical implementation procedure].

Authors:  E Wenkel; M Uder; R Janka
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  1H-MR spectroscopy of suspicious breast mass lesions at 3T: a clinical experience.

Authors:  Stefania Montemezzi; Carlo Cavedon; Lucia Camera; Gabriele Meliadò; Francesca Caumo; Ilaria Baglio; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Grading system to categorize breast MRI using BI-RADS 5th edition: a statistical study of non-mass enhancement descriptors in terms of probability of malignancy.

Authors:  Tatsunori Asada; Takayuki Yamada; Yoshihide Kanemaki; Keishi Fujiwara; Satoko Okamoto; Yasuo Nakajima
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 2.374

10.  Nonmalignant breast lesions: ADCs of benign and high-risk subtypes assessed as false-positive at dynamic enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Sana Parsian; Habib Rahbar; Kimberly H Allison; Wendy B Demartini; Matthew L Olson; Constance D Lehman; Savannah C Partridge
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.