Literature DB >> 21187549

Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic compression fractures using calcium phosphate cement.

Shigeo Ishiguro1, Yuichi Kasai, Akihiro Sudo, Koji Iida, Atsumasa Uchida.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty using calcium phosphate cement (CPC) versus conservative treatment for osteoporotic vertebral fractures.
METHODS: Eight men and 28 women aged 61 to 99 (mean, 80) years with osteoporotic vertebral fractures underwent percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty using CPC. During the same period, 6 men and 32 women aged 53 to 93 (mean, 77) years underwent conservative treatment. The indication for vertebroplasty was a painful unstable fracture, with mobility of the vertebral body shown on flexion and extension lateral radiographs. Fractures without mobility despite deformity were treated conservatively.
RESULTS: In the vertebroplasty group, all patients benefited from reduced back pain immediately after surgery, and pain relief was maintained at the latest follow-up. However, correction loss continued until one month after the operation. The mean visual analogue score for pain decreased significantly from preoperation to one day after surgery (9.3 vs. 6.2, p=0.02), and further decreased to 2.8 (p = 0.04) on day 3 or 4 when ambulation began, and to 1.5 at the one month follow-up and 1.4 at the final follow-up (mean, 14 months). The mean duration of analgesic treatment was significantly shorter in the vertebroplasty than conservatively treated group (10.2 vs. 63.5 days). All patients in the vertebroplasty group achieved bone union, with no adjacent vertebral fractures. However, in patients having conservative treatment, there were 2 adjacent vertebral fractures and 4 pseudarthroses, and the collapse continued for several months.
CONCLUSION: Percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty using CPC achieves immediate pain relief and reduces the risk of vertebral body collapse and pseudarthrosis among elderly patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21187549     DOI: 10.1177/230949901001800318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)        ISSN: 1022-5536            Impact factor:   1.118


  9 in total

1.  Is vertebroplasty a risk factor for subsequent vertebral fracture, meta-analysis of published evidence?

Authors:  S L Han; S L Wan; Q T Li; D T Xu; H M Zang; N J Chen; L Y Chen; W P Zhang; C Luan; F Yang; Z W Xu
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Third-generation percutaneous vertebral augmentation systems.

Authors:  Daniele Vanni; Renato Galzio; Anna Kazakova; Andrea Pantalone; Giovanni Grillea; Marcello Bartolo; Vincenzo Salini; Vincenzo Magliani
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-03

3.  Is kyphoplasty necessary?

Authors:  Shigeo Ishiguro; Koji Akeda; Masaya Tsujii; Akihiro Sudo
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2013-09-04

4.  Preparation and Characterization of Injectable Brushite Filled-Poly (Methyl Methacrylate) Bone Cement.

Authors:  Lucas C Rodriguez; Jonathan Chari; Shant Aghyarian; Izabelle M Gindri; Victor Kosmopoulos; Danieli C Rodrigues
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 5.  Pathomechanisms and management of osteoporotic pain with no traumatic evidence.

Authors:  Sumihisa Orita; Kazuhide Inage; Miyako Suzuki; Kazuki Fujimoto; Kazuyo Yamauchi; Junichi Nakamura; Yusuke Matsuura; Takeo Furuya; Masao Koda; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Seiji Ohtori
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2017-12-20

Review 6.  Application and modification of bone cement in vertebroplasty: A literature review.

Authors:  Qian Wang; Jun-Feng Dong; Xu Fang; Yang Chen
Journal:  Jt Dis Relat Surg       Date:  2022-07-06

7.  Bone healing response to a synthetic calcium sulfate/β-tricalcium phosphate graft material in a sheep vertebral body defect model.

Authors:  H L Yang; X S Zhu; L Chen; C M Chen; D C Mangham; L A Coulton; S S Aiken
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.368

8.  New perspective for third generation percutaneous vertebral augmentation procedures: Preliminary results at 12 months.

Authors:  Daniele Vanni; Andrea Pantalone; Francesco Bigossi; Filippo Pineto; Danilo Lucantoni; Vincenzo Salini
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2012-07

Review 9.  Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review.

Authors:  Wenhao Wang; Kelvin W K Yeung
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2017-06-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.