Literature DB >> 21187201

Effects of sensory cueing on voluntary arm use for patients with chronic stroke: a preliminary study.

Kenneth N Fong1, Pinky C Lo, Yoyo S Yu, Connie K Cheuk, Toto H Tsang, Ash S Po, Chetwyn C Chan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of a 2-week program of sensory cueing in which vibration induces the use of the paretic upper extremity in participants with chronic stroke in the community.
DESIGN: A single-group longitudinal study.
SETTING: Self-help organizations. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 16 community residents (N=16) with chronic unilateral stroke and mild to moderate upper-extremity impairment stratified by the severity of their paretic arm function, measured by using the Functional Test for the Hemiplegic Upper Extremity (FTHUE).
INTERVENTIONS: Participants engaged in repetitive upper-extremity task practice for 2 weeks while wearing an ambulatory sensory cueing device on their affected hand for 3 hours a day. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Evaluations were conducted on the 3 occasions of pretest (1 day before training), posttest (immediately after training), and follow-up test (2 weeks after training) by using the following behavioral measures of paretic upper-extremity performance: the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), the Box and Block Test, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), the FTHUE, power and pinch grips, the Motor Activity Log assessment of arm use, and kinematic data obtained from the device.
RESULTS: Significant differences were found in ARAT and FMA scores among the pretest, posttest, and follow-up evaluations. The lower functioning group achieved a more significant increase in overall upper-extremity score than in the hand score for the FMA.
CONCLUSION: A combination of sensory cueing and movement-based strategies is useful and feasible in improving paretic upper-extremity performance in participants with chronic stroke; however, additional studies with a larger sample size and longer treatment period in a randomized controlled trial would be beneficial.
Copyright © 2011 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21187201     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  5 in total

1.  Functional Test of the Hemiparetic Upper Extremity: A Rasch Analysis With Theoretical Implications.

Authors:  Veronica T Rowe; Carolee J Winstein; Steven L Wolf; Michelle L Woodbury
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 2.  Precision grip in congenital and acquired hemiparesis: similarities in impairments and implications for neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Yannick Bleyenheuft; Andrew M Gordon
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Comparison of upper extremity motor recovery of stroke patients with actual physical activity in their daily lives measured with accelerometers.

Authors:  Sunhwa Shim; Hee Kim; Jinhwa Jung
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-07-30

4.  Determining Factors that Influence Adoption of New Post-Stroke Sensorimotor Rehabilitation Devices in the USA.

Authors:  Corey M Morrow; Emily Johnson; Kit N Simpson; Na Jin Seo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.528

5.  Effects of priming intermittent theta burst stimulation on upper limb motor recovery after stroke: study protocol for a proof-of-concept randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jack Jiaqi Zhang; Kenneth N K Fong
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-03-08       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.