Literature DB >> 21186922

Brain potential indices of novelty processing are associated with preference for amphetamine.

Frances H Gabbay1, Connie C Duncan, Craig G McDonald.   

Abstract

A behavioral drug preference procedure was used to identify two groups of healthy individuals. One group preferred 10 mg of d-amphetamine over placebo (Choosers) and the other preferred placebo (Nonchoosers). In separate sessions, participants were administered placebo, 10, and 15 mg of d-amphetamine, and event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded while participants performed two 3-stimulus oddball tasks. The effect of d-amphetamine on P3a, an ERP index of the orienting response, differed between groups: In Choosers, target stimuli elicited P3a after d-amphetamine but not after placebo; in Nonchoosers, the drug had no effect on P3a. Moreover, two group differences were evident after placebo and were unaffected by d-amphetamine. (1) N100 was larger in Nonchoosers than in Choosers, suggesting that Nonchoosers were more attentive than Choosers to the physical features of the stimuli. (2) The reorienting negativity (RON) elicited by targets in both tasks and by rare nontargets in a novelty oddball task (i.e., novel sounds) was larger in Nonchoosers than in Choosers. This suggests that Nonchoosers more effectively refocused attention on the task after distraction. It is hypothesized that these processing differences reflect a group difference in the balance between midbrain dopamine function and ascending cholinergic influences. The findings have implications for vulnerability to addiction and illustrate the promise of ERPs in parsing elemental phenotypes. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21186922     DOI: 10.1037/a0021653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 1064-1297            Impact factor:   3.157


  4 in total

1.  Sensation seeking predicts brain responses in the old-new task: converging multimodal neuroimaging evidence.

Authors:  Adam L Lawson; Xun Liu; Jane Joseph; Victoria L Vagnini; Thomas H Kelly; Yang Jiang
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  Inter-individual diversity and intra-individual stability of amphetamine-induced sensitization of frequency-modulated 50-kHz vocalization in Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Ewa Taracha; Adam Hamed; Paweł Krząścik; Małgorzata Lehner; Anna Skórzewska; Adam Płaźnik; Stanisław J Chrapusta
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Distinctive personality traits and neural correlates associated with stimulant drug use versus familial risk of stimulant dependence.

Authors:  Karen D Ersche; P Simon Jones; Guy B Williams; Dana G Smith; Edward T Bullmore; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  The detection of novelty relies on dopaminergic signaling: evidence from apomorphine's impact on the novelty N2.

Authors:  Mauricio Rangel-Gomez; Clayton Hickey; Therese van Amelsvoort; Pierre Bet; Martijn Meeter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.