Literature DB >> 21185734

Determining the appropriate sleeve lobectomy versus pneumonectomy ratio in central non-small cell lung cancer patients: an audit of an aggressive policy of pneumonectomy avoidance.

Abel Gómez-Caro1, Samuel Garcia, Noemí Reguart, Esther Cladellas, Pedro Arguis, Marcelo Sanchez, Josep Maria Gimferrer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the outcomes of broncho ± angioplastic sleeve lobectomy (SL) versus pneumonectomy (PN), and the PN:SL ratio after an aggressive policy of parenchyma-sparing surgery to improve postoperative complications rate and long-term quality of life (QoL).
METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in 490 patients with non-small cell lung cancer between 2005 and 2009. All patients not suitable for standard lobectomy were scheduled for SL, if possible, or for PN; eight patients with functional impairment were directly scheduled for SL.
RESULTS: Of 76 procedures, 21 (4%) were PN and 55 (11%) SL (29 bronchoplastic, seven bronchovascular, seven angioplastic; 11 extended to more than one lobe). There were no surgical, oncological or physiological preoperative differences between the groups. The 5-year PN:SL ratio was 1:2.6 (2005: 1:2.1; 2006: 1:2.6; 2007: 1:3.6; 2008: 1:3; 2009: 1:3.5). SL and PN mortality were 2 (3.6%) and 1 (5%), respectively. Postoperative complications occurred in 18 (32%) SL and 7 (33%) PN patients. pN1 (p = 0.04), vascular reconstruction and upper-left SL were risk factors for postoperative complications of SL (p = 0.03) but were not detected as a mortality risk. Overall 5-year survival was 61% for SL and 31% for PN. Survival at 5 years was significantly higher for SL (p = 0.03, Kaplan-Meier). Age <70 years and SL were positive factors for long-term survival. In multivariate modelling, both remained positive factors. Surviving PN patients experienced significantly greater loss of respiratory function and lower QoL than those who avoided this surgery (preoperative score, PN vs SL: 52 vs 51; 3 months, 41 vs 43; and 6 months, 42 vs 51, p = 0.04). The adjuvant treatment complement was higher in SL at 34 (62%) than at PN 10 (47%). The side effects of this treatment were more frequent in patients with more extirpated parenchyma (p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Parenchyma-sparing procedures can reduce the PN rate to less than 10%. A PN:SL index lower than 1:1.5 as a quality standard in a specialised thoracic unit should encourage the use of broncho-angioplastic procedures and improve patient outcomes. Long-term survival, QoL, postoperative lung function test and tolerance of adjuvant therapies are significantly better after SL than PN intervention.
Copyright © 2010 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21185734     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of short and long-term results between sleeve resection and pneumonectomy in lung cancer patients over 70 years old: 10 years experience from a single institution in China.

Authors:  Xufeng Pan; Jicheng Tantai; Ling Lin; Kejian Cao; Heng Zhao
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 2.  Surgical treatment of air way disease.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Maniwa
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Reconstruction of the bronchus and pulmonary artery.

Authors:  Giulio Maurizi; Antonio D'Andrilli; Federico Venuta; Erino Angelo Rendina
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Bronchial and arterial sleeve resection for centrally-located lung cancers.

Authors:  Giulio Maurizi; Antonio D'Andrilli; Federico Venuta; Erino Angelo Rendina
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Surgical Techniques of Y-Sleeve Lobectomy in Patients With Primary Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Takuma Tsukioka; Nobuhiro Izumi; Hiroaki Komatsu; Hidetoshi Inoue; Ryuichi Ito; Noritoshi Nishiyama
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Prognostic analysis of the bronchoplastic and broncho-arterioplastic lobectomy of non-small cell lung cancers-10-year experiences of 161 patients.

Authors:  Li-Lan Zhao; Fang-Yu Zhou; Chen-Yang Dai; Yi-Jiu Ren; Ge-Ning Jiang; Ke Fei; Chang Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  For non-small cell lung cancer with T3 (central) disease, sleeve lobectomy or pneumonectomy?

Authors:  Qian-Li Ma; Yong-Qing Guo; Bin Shi; Yan-Chu Tian; Zhi-Yi Song; De-Ruo Liu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Sleeve lobectomy compared with pneumonectomy for operable centrally located non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhengjun Li; Wei Chen; Mozhu Xia; Hongxu Liu; Yongyu Liu; Ilhan Inci; Fabio Davoli; Ryuichi Waseda; Pier Luigi Filosso; Abby White
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2019-12

9.  Sleeve lobectomy versus pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Woda Shi; Wei Zhang; Haoliang Sun; Yongfeng Shao
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Left upper lobe double sleeve lobectomy with double barrel anastomosis for lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hidetaka Uramoto; Yuki Nakajima; Hiroyasu Kinoshita
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2016-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.