Literature DB >> 21185644

Waterbirth and pelvic floor injury: a retrospective study and postal survey using ICIQ modular long form questionnaires.

Eduardo Cortes1, Ramandeep Basra, Con J Kelleher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Benefits attributed to waterbirth (WB) include a shorter second stage of labour and reduction of perineal trauma. The aim of this study is to assess the incidence of perineal trauma and pelvic floor function following WB compared to land birth (LB). STUDY
DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective analysis on the incidence of perineal trauma following a spontaneous WB (n=160) or a LB (n=623). Data were collected using the hospital's healthcare database, which codes information on pregnancy outcomes and related variables. ICIQ-VS for vaginal symptoms, and the ICIQ-KH Long Form (KHQ) were used to assess pelvic floor function a year after delivery.
RESULTS: Length of 2nd stage was significantly shorter in the WB group. Although this did not translate into less perineal trauma, the incidence of 3rd degree tears appeared to be doubled in the WB group. 77 (38.5%) women from the WB group and 54 (22%) from the LB group answered the postal questionnaires. A significant number of women reported vaginal and urinary symptoms, however the difference between both groups was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: Waterbirth results in a shorter 2nd stage of labour. This does not lead to less overall perineal trauma or better pelvic floor performance postpartum. Physical limitations in protecting the perineum during the expulsion phase may be associated with an increase in the incidence of 3rd degree tears in the WB population.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21185644     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  7 in total

1.  Predictors of obstetric anal sphincter injury during waterbirth: a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Ethel Burns; Laura Price; Jane Carpenter; Lesley Smith
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Does water birth affect the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury? Development of a prognostic model.

Authors:  Helen Louise Preston; Zarko Alfirevic; Gillian Elizabeth Fowler; Steven Lane
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Perineal injuries and birth positions among 2992 women with a low risk pregnancy who opted for a homebirth.

Authors:  Malin Edqvist; Ellen Blix; Hanne K Hegaard; Olöf Ásta Ólafsdottir; Ingegerd Hildingsson; Karen Ingversen; Margareta Mollberg; Helena Lindgren
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 4.  Immersion in water during labour and birth.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Cluett; Ethel Burns; Anna Cuthbert
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-16

5.  Labouring women who used a birthing pool in obstetric units in Italy: prospective observational study.

Authors:  Jane Henderson; Ethel E Burns; Anna L Regalia; Giovanna Casarico; Mary G Boulton; Lesley A Smith
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  The effect of water immersion delivery on the strength of pelvic floor muscle and pelvic floor disorders during postpartum period: An experimental study.

Authors:  Yun Zhao; Mei Xiao; Fei Tang; Wan Tang; Heng Yin; Guo-Qiang Sun; Yin Lin; Yong Zhou; Yan Luo; Lu-Man Li; Zhi-Hua Tan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  A Discrete Choice Experiment on Women's Preferences for Water Immersion During Labor and Birth: Identification, Refinement and Selection of Attributes and Levels.

Authors:  Thomas G Poder; Nathalie Carrier; Mathieu Roy; Chantal Camden
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.