Literature DB >> 21185591

Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes in pre-eclampsia: development and validation of the fullPIERS model.

Peter von Dadelszen1, Beth Payne, Jing Li, J Mark Ansermino, Fiona Broughton Pipkin, Anne-Marie Côté, M Joanne Douglas, Andrée Gruslin, Jennifer A Hutcheon, K S Joseph, Phillipa M Kyle, Tang Lee, Pamela Loughna, Jennifer M Menzies, Mario Merialdi, Alexandra L Millman, M Peter Moore, Jean-Marie Moutquin, Annie B Ouellet, Graeme N Smith, James J Walker, Keith R Walley, Barry N Walters, Mariana Widmer, Shoo K Lee, James A Russell, Laura A Magee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pre-eclampsia is a leading cause of maternal deaths. These deaths mainly result from eclampsia, uncontrolled hypertension, or systemic inflammation. We developed and validated the fullPIERS model with the aim of identifying the risk of fatal or life-threatening complications in women with pre-eclampsia within 48 h of hospital admission for the disorder.
METHODS: We developed and internally validated the fullPIERS model in a prospective, multicentre study in women who were admitted to tertiary obstetric centres with pre-eclampsia or who developed pre-eclampsia after admission. The outcome of interest was maternal mortality or other serious complications of pre-eclampsia. Routinely reported and informative variables were included in a stepwise backward elimination regression model to predict the adverse maternal outcome. We assessed performance using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC). Standard bootstrapping techniques were used to assess potential overfitting.
FINDINGS: 261 of 2023 women with pre-eclampsia had adverse outcomes at any time after hospital admission (106 [5%] within 48 h of admission). Predictors of adverse maternal outcome included gestational age, chest pain or dyspnoea, oxygen saturation, platelet count, and creatinine and aspartate transaminase concentrations. The fullPIERS model predicted adverse maternal outcomes within 48 h of study eligibility (AUC ROC 0·88, 95% CI 0·84-0·92). There was no significant overfitting. fullPIERS performed well (AUC ROC >0·7) up to 7 days after eligibility.
INTERPRETATION: The fullPIERS model identifies women at increased risk of adverse outcomes up to 7 days before complications arise and can thereby modify direct patient care (eg, timing of delivery, place of care), improve the design of clinical trials, and inform biomedical investigations related to pre-eclampsia. FUNDING: Canadian Institutes of Health Research; UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development, and Research Training in Human Reproduction; Preeclampsia Foundation; International Federation of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research; and Child and Family Research Institute. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21185591     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61351-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  109 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiology of preeclampsia: impact of obesity.

Authors:  Arun Jeyabalan
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 7.110

2.  Selecting candidate predictor variables for the modelling of post-discharge mortality from sepsis: a protocol development project.

Authors:  Matthew O Wiens; Niranjan Kissoon; Elias Kumbakumba; Joel Singer; Peter P Moschovis; J Mark Ansermino; Andrew Ndamira; Julius Kiwanuka; Charles P Larson
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.927

3.  Maternal plasma concentrations of angiogenic/anti-angiogenic factors are of prognostic value in patients presenting to the obstetrical triage area with the suspicion of preeclampsia.

Authors:  Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Roberto Romero; Zeynep Alpay Savasan; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Giovanna Ogge; Eleazar Soto; Zhong Dong; Adi Tarca; Bhatti Gaurav; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2011-08-09

Review 4.  Analyzing Preeclampsia as the Tip of the Iceberg Represented by Women with Long-Term Cardiovascular Disease, Atherosclerosis, and Inflammation.

Authors:  Angélica Lemos Debs Diniz; Maria Marta Bini Martins Paes; Aline Debs Diniz
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 5.113

5.  Choosing outcomes in pregnancy research.

Authors:  Laura A Magee
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2011-12-08

Review 6.  Acute myocardial infarction in the obstetric patient.

Authors:  Tabassum Firoz; Laura A Magee
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2012-03-22

7.  Ecalmpsia: maternal and fetal outcome.

Authors:  Tukur A Jido
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 0.927

Review 8.  Vascular Dysfunction in Mother and Offspring During Preeclampsia: Contributions from Latin-American Countries.

Authors:  Fernanda Regina Giachini; Carlos Galaviz-Hernandez; Alicia E Damiano; Marta Viana; Angela Cadavid; Patricia Asturizaga; Enrique Teran; Sonia Clapes; Martin Alcala; Julio Bueno; María Calderón-Domínguez; María P Ramos; Victor Vitorino Lima; Martha Sosa-Macias; Nora Martinez; James M Roberts; Carlos Escudero
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 5.369

9.  Reverse innovation in maternal health.

Authors:  Tabassum Firoz; Prestige Tatenda Makanga; Hannah L Nathan; Beth Payne; Laura A Magee
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2017-05-16

10.  Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with CKD.

Authors:  Giorgina Barbara Piccoli; Gianfranca Cabiddu; Rossella Attini; Federica Neve Vigotti; Stefania Maxia; Nicola Lepori; Milena Tuveri; Marco Massidda; Cecilia Marchi; Silvia Mura; Alessandra Coscia; Marilisa Biolcati; Pietro Gaglioti; Michele Nichelatti; Luciana Pibiri; Giuseppe Chessa; Antonello Pani; Tullia Todros
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 10.121

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.