Literature DB >> 21185190

ATP hydrolysis is required for relocating cohesin from sites occupied by its Scc2/4 loading complex.

Bin Hu1, Takehiko Itoh2, Ajay Mishra1, Yuki Katoh2, Kok-Lung Chan1, William Upcher1, Camilla Godlee1, Maurici B Roig1, Katsuhiko Shirahige2,3, Kim Nasmyth1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Cohesin complex that holds sister chromatins together until anaphase is comprised of three core subunits: Smc1 and Smc3, two long-rod-shaped proteins with an ABC-like ATPase head (nucleotide-binding domain [NBD]) and a dimerization domain linked by a 50 nm long intramolecular antiparallel coiled-coil, and Scc1, an α-kleisin subunit interconnecting the NBD domains of Smc1 and Smc3. Cohesin's stable association with chromosomes is thought to involve entrapment of chromatin fibers by its tripartite Smc1-Smc3-Scc1 ring via a poorly understood mechanism dependent on a separate Scc2/4 loading complex. A key issue concerns where entrapment initially takes place: at sites where cohesin is found stably associated or at distinct "loading" sites from which it translocates.
RESULTS: In this study, we find transition state mutant versions (Smc1E1158Q and SmcE1155Q) defective in disengagement of their nucleotide binding domains (NBDs), unlike functional cohesin, colocalize with Scc2/4 at core centromeres, sites that catalyze wild-type cohesin's recruitment to sequences 20 kb or more away. In addition to Scc2/4, the unstable association of transition state complexes with core centromeres requires Scc1's association with Smc1 and Smc3 NBDs, ATP-driven NBD engagement, cohesin's Scc3 subunit, and its hinge domain.
CONCLUSION: We propose that cohesin's association with chromosomes is driven by two key events. NBD engagement driven by ATP binding produces an unstable association with specific loading sites like core centromeres, whereas subsequent ATP hydrolysis triggers DNA entrapment, which permits translocation along chromatin fibers.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21185190      PMCID: PMC4763544          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  44 in total

1.  Evidence that loading of cohesin onto chromosomes involves opening of its SMC hinge.

Authors:  Stephan Gruber; Prakash Arumugam; Yuki Katou; Daria Kuglitsch; Wolfgang Helmhart; Katsuhiko Shirahige; Kim Nasmyth
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  A physical assay for sister chromatid cohesion in vitro.

Authors:  Dmitri Ivanov; Kim Nasmyth
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 3.  Sister chromatid cohesion: a simple concept with a complex reality.

Authors:  Itay Onn; Jill M Heidinger-Pauli; Vincent Guacci; Elçin Unal; Douglas E Koshland
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 13.827

4.  Releasing cohesin from chromosome arms in early mitosis: opposing actions of Wapl-Pds5 and Sgo1.

Authors:  Keishi Shintomi; Tatsuya Hirano
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Both interaction surfaces within cohesin's hinge domain are essential for its stable chromosomal association.

Authors:  Ajay Mishra; Bin Hu; Alexander Kurze; Frédéric Beckouët; Ana-Maria Farcas; Sarah E Dixon; Yuki Katou; Syma Khalid; Katsuhiko Shirahige; Kim Nasmyth
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Recruitment of condensin to replication origin regions by ParB/SpoOJ promotes chromosome segregation in B. subtilis.

Authors:  Stephan Gruber; Jeff Errington
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 7.  ChIP-seq: advantages and challenges of a maturing technology.

Authors:  Peter J Park
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Conserved features of cohesin binding along fission yeast chromosomes.

Authors:  Christine K Schmidt; Neil Brookes; Frank Uhlmann
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  In vivo analysis of cohesin architecture using FRET in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  John Mc Intyre; Eric G D Muller; Stefan Weitzer; Brian E Snydsman; Trisha N Davis; Frank Uhlmann
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  The kinetochore is an enhancer of pericentric cohesin binding.

Authors:  Stewart A Weber; Jennifer L Gerton; Joan E Polancic; Joseph L DeRisi; Douglas Koshland; Paul C Megee
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-07-27       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  103 in total

1.  SMC condensin: promoting cohesion of replicon arms.

Authors:  Frank Bürmann; Stephan Gruber
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 2.  Towards a Unified Model of SMC Complex Function.

Authors:  Markus Hassler; Indra A Shaltiel; Christian H Haering
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  The Energetics and Physiological Impact of Cohesin Extrusion.

Authors:  Laura Vian; Aleksandra Pękowska; Suhas S P Rao; Kyong-Rim Kieffer-Kwon; Seolkyoung Jung; Laura Baranello; Su-Chen Huang; Laila El Khattabi; Marei Dose; Nathanael Pruett; Adrian L Sanborn; Andres Canela; Yaakov Maman; Anna Oksanen; Wolfgang Resch; Xingwang Li; Byoungkoo Lee; Alexander L Kovalchuk; Zhonghui Tang; Steevenson Nelson; Michele Di Pierro; Ryan R Cheng; Ido Machol; Brian Glenn St Hilaire; Neva C Durand; Muhammad S Shamim; Elena K Stamenova; José N Onuchic; Yijun Ruan; Andre Nussenzweig; David Levens; Erez Lieberman Aiden; Rafael Casellas
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  Genome folding through loop extrusion by SMC complexes.

Authors:  Iain F Davidson; Jan-Michael Peters
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 5.  The torments of the cohesin ring.

Authors:  Alap P Chavda; Keven Ang; Dmitri Ivanov
Journal:  Nucleus       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 4.197

6.  Cohesin acetylation and Wapl-Pds5 oppositely regulate translocation of cohesin along DNA.

Authors:  Mai Kanke; Eri Tahara; Pim J Huis In't Veld; Tomoko Nishiyama
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  An asymmetric SMC-kleisin bridge in prokaryotic condensin.

Authors:  Frank Bürmann; Ho-Chul Shin; Jérôme Basquin; Young-Min Soh; Victor Giménez-Oya; Yeon-Gil Kim; Byung-Ha Oh; Stephan Gruber
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2013-01-27       Impact factor: 15.369

8.  Breaking symmetry in SMCs.

Authors:  Amy L Upton; David J Sherratt
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 9.  Centromeric heterochromatin: the primordial segregation machine.

Authors:  Kerry S Bloom
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 16.830

10.  Cell cycle-specific cleavage of Scc2 regulates its cohesin deposition activity.

Authors:  Julie Woodman; Tyler Fara; Monika Dzieciatkowska; Michael Trejo; Nancy Luong; Kirk C Hansen; Paul C Megee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.