Bin Hu1, Takehiko Itoh2, Ajay Mishra1, Yuki Katoh2, Kok-Lung Chan1, William Upcher1, Camilla Godlee1, Maurici B Roig1, Katsuhiko Shirahige2,3, Kim Nasmyth1. 1. Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK. 2. Laboratory of In Silico Functional Genomics, Graduate School of Bioscience, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 4259 Nagatsuta, Midoriku, Yokohama 226-8501, Japan. 3. Research Center for Epigenetic Disease, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Cohesin complex that holds sister chromatins together until anaphase is comprised of three core subunits: Smc1 and Smc3, two long-rod-shaped proteins with an ABC-like ATPase head (nucleotide-binding domain [NBD]) and a dimerization domain linked by a 50 nm long intramolecular antiparallel coiled-coil, and Scc1, an α-kleisin subunit interconnecting the NBD domains of Smc1 and Smc3. Cohesin's stable association with chromosomes is thought to involve entrapment of chromatin fibers by its tripartite Smc1-Smc3-Scc1 ring via a poorly understood mechanism dependent on a separate Scc2/4 loading complex. A key issue concerns where entrapment initially takes place: at sites where cohesin is found stably associated or at distinct "loading" sites from which it translocates. RESULTS: In this study, we find transition state mutant versions (Smc1E1158Q and SmcE1155Q) defective in disengagement of their nucleotide binding domains (NBDs), unlike functional cohesin, colocalize with Scc2/4 at core centromeres, sites that catalyze wild-type cohesin's recruitment to sequences 20 kb or more away. In addition to Scc2/4, the unstable association of transition state complexes with core centromeres requires Scc1's association with Smc1 and Smc3 NBDs, ATP-driven NBD engagement, cohesin's Scc3 subunit, and its hinge domain. CONCLUSION: We propose that cohesin's association with chromosomes is driven by two key events. NBD engagement driven by ATP binding produces an unstable association with specific loading sites like core centromeres, whereas subsequent ATP hydrolysis triggers DNA entrapment, which permits translocation along chromatin fibers.
BACKGROUND: The Cohesin complex that holds sister chromatins together until anaphase is comprised of three core subunits: Smc1 and Smc3, two long-rod-shaped proteins with an ABC-like ATPase head (nucleotide-binding domain [NBD]) and a dimerization domain linked by a 50 nm long intramolecular antiparallel coiled-coil, and Scc1, an α-kleisin subunit interconnecting the NBD domains of Smc1 and Smc3. Cohesin's stable association with chromosomes is thought to involve entrapment of chromatin fibers by its tripartite Smc1-Smc3-Scc1 ring via a poorly understood mechanism dependent on a separate Scc2/4 loading complex. A key issue concerns where entrapment initially takes place: at sites where cohesin is found stably associated or at distinct "loading" sites from which it translocates. RESULTS: In this study, we find transition state mutant versions (Smc1E1158Q and SmcE1155Q) defective in disengagement of their nucleotide binding domains (NBDs), unlike functional cohesin, colocalize with Scc2/4 at core centromeres, sites that catalyze wild-type cohesin's recruitment to sequences 20 kb or more away. In addition to Scc2/4, the unstable association of transition state complexes with core centromeres requires Scc1's association with Smc1 and Smc3 NBDs, ATP-driven NBD engagement, cohesin's Scc3 subunit, and its hinge domain. CONCLUSION: We propose that cohesin's association with chromosomes is driven by two key events. NBD engagement driven by ATP binding produces an unstable association with specific loading sites like core centromeres, whereas subsequent ATP hydrolysis triggers DNA entrapment, which permits translocation along chromatin fibers.
Authors: Itay Onn; Jill M Heidinger-Pauli; Vincent Guacci; Elçin Unal; Douglas E Koshland Journal: Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol Date: 2008 Impact factor: 13.827
Authors: John Mc Intyre; Eric G D Muller; Stefan Weitzer; Brian E Snydsman; Trisha N Davis; Frank Uhlmann Journal: EMBO J Date: 2007-07-26 Impact factor: 11.598
Authors: Stewart A Weber; Jennifer L Gerton; Joan E Polancic; Joseph L DeRisi; Douglas Koshland; Paul C Megee Journal: PLoS Biol Date: 2004-07-27 Impact factor: 8.029
Authors: Laura Vian; Aleksandra Pękowska; Suhas S P Rao; Kyong-Rim Kieffer-Kwon; Seolkyoung Jung; Laura Baranello; Su-Chen Huang; Laila El Khattabi; Marei Dose; Nathanael Pruett; Adrian L Sanborn; Andres Canela; Yaakov Maman; Anna Oksanen; Wolfgang Resch; Xingwang Li; Byoungkoo Lee; Alexander L Kovalchuk; Zhonghui Tang; Steevenson Nelson; Michele Di Pierro; Ryan R Cheng; Ido Machol; Brian Glenn St Hilaire; Neva C Durand; Muhammad S Shamim; Elena K Stamenova; José N Onuchic; Yijun Ruan; Andre Nussenzweig; David Levens; Erez Lieberman Aiden; Rafael Casellas Journal: Cell Date: 2018-04-26 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Julie Woodman; Tyler Fara; Monika Dzieciatkowska; Michael Trejo; Nancy Luong; Kirk C Hansen; Paul C Megee Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-04-28 Impact factor: 11.205