Literature DB >> 21185118

Impact of responder definition on the enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal trial design for establishing proof of concept in neuropathic pain.

David J Hewitt1, Tony W Ho, Bradley Galer, Miroslav Backonja, Paul Markovitz, Arnold Gammaitoni, David Michelson, James Bolognese, Achilles Alon, Elizabeth Rosenberg, Gary Herman, Hao Wang.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate how enrichment for responders increases assay sensitivity in an enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal (EERW) proof-of-concept (POC) study in neuropathic pain. Adults with moderate to severe peripheral neuropathic pain entered a 3- to 4-day screening period, followed by a 12-day titration to the highest tolerated dose that provided pain control (pregabalin 50-200mg t.i.d.), and then a 9-day maintenance period. Subjects were stratified as primary responders (⩾30%), secondary responders (⩾10% to <30%), or nonresponders (<10%) based on decrease in pain intensity and were randomized to placebo or pregabalin during the randomized withdrawal period. The primary endpoint was mean of average 24-h pain intensity during the last 3days of treatment period relative to the 3days before randomization. Time-to-efficacy-failure was the key secondary endpoint. Other features included not requiring discontinuation of current analgesic therapies and blinding investigators to study design elements that could contribute to non-treatment-related responses. Effect size (ES) (mean treatment difference/SD) was used to measure assay sensitivity. Pregabalin-treated subjects (n=52) had significantly less pain than those receiving placebo (n=51) (P⩽.003). Effect size of the primary endpoint was 0.72 for primary responders and decreased if secondary and nonresponders were included in the analysis. The highest ES (1.68) was demonstrated for the endpoint time-to-efficacy-failure seen in primary responders with painful diabetic neuropathy. The EERW trial design using time-to-efficacy-failure may provide a sensitive and efficient method to conduct POC studies of novel therapies in patients with neuropathic pain. Enriching a study population with patients who have achieved a 30% decrease in pain with an investigational therapy, and using time-to-efficacy-failure during the randomized withdrawal phase as the primary endpoint, can be used for a proof-of-concept study to optimize assay sensitivity and efficiently determine the analgesic potential of a new treatment for neuropathic pain.
Copyright © 2010 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21185118     DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.10.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  15 in total

Review 1.  Drug therapy for chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy.

Authors:  Janna Warendorf; Alexander Fje Vrancken; Ivo N van Schaik; Richard Ac Hughes; Nicolette C Notermans
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-20

2.  Temporary practice pause then resumption (TPPR) study design: an extension of the withdrawal study design to complementary and alternative medicine mind and body interventions (CAM-MABI).

Authors:  M Miles Braun
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 2.579

Review 3.  Lost but making progress--Where will new analgesic drugs come from?

Authors:  David Borsook; Richard Hargreaves; Chas Bountra; Frank Porreca
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 4.  Evidence for the efficacy and effectiveness of THC-CBD oromucosal spray in symptom management of patients with spasticity due to multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Uwe K Zettl; Paulus Rommer; Petra Hipp; Robert Patejdl
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.570

5.  Pregabalin for neuropathic pain in adults.

Authors:  Sheena Derry; Rae Frances Bell; Sebastian Straube; Philip J Wiffen; Dominic Aldington; R Andrew Moore
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-01-23

6.  Pain threshold correlates with functional scores in osteoarthritis patients.

Authors:  Benita Kuni; Haili Wang; Markus Rickert; Volker Ewerbeck; Marcus Schiltenwolf
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Predictors of placebo response in peripheral neuropathic pain: insights from pregabalin clinical trials.

Authors:  Roy Freeman; Birol Emir; Bruce Parsons
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.133

8.  The MOBILE Study-A Phase IIa Enriched Enrollment Randomized Withdrawal Trial to Assess the Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of ASP8477, a Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase Inhibitor, in Patients with Peripheral Neuropathic Pain.

Authors:  Daniel Bradford; Anjali Stirling; Etienne Ernault; Maggie Liosatos; Katherine Tracy; Jennifer Moseley; Paul Blahunka; Mike D Smith
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.750

9.  Efficient assessment of efficacy in post-traumatic peripheral neuropathic pain patients: pregabalin in a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study.

Authors:  Tim M Jenkins; Trevor S Smart; Frances Hackman; Carol Cooke; Keith Kc Tan
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.133

10.  Duloxetine use in chronic painful conditions--individual patient data responder analysis.

Authors:  R A Moore; N Cai; V Skljarevski; T R Tölle
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.