Literature DB >> 21184872

The target sign: an endoscopic marker for the resection of the muscularis propria and potential perforation during colonic endoscopic mucosal resection.

Michael P Swan1, Michael J Bourke, Alan Moss, Stephen J Williams, Andrew Hopper, Andrew Metz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: EMR of large sessile polyps and laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) of the colon is safe and cost-effective. Perforation remains a feared and well-recognized complication; however, endoscopic detection is often absent, and most commonly, diagnosis is delayed and depends on clinical signs and/or radiology findings. To date, an endoscopic sign to identify muscularis propria (MP) resection and potential perforation has not been described.
OBJECTIVE: To describe an endoscopic sign for prompt recognition of EMR-related MP resection.
DESIGN: Prospective analysis. SETTINGS: Tertiary referral academic gastroenterology unit. PATIENTS: Patients with the target sign were identified prospectively in 2 large prospective studies of EMR for colonic LSTs 20 mm or larger. INTERVENTION: A standardized EMR approach was used. MP defects were closed endoscopically with clips. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The presence or absence of the target sign in the polypectomy specimen and its influence on subsequent endoscopic management of polypectomy complications.
RESULTS: A total of 445 patients with LSTs or sessile polyps 20 mm or larger (mean size 33 mm, range 20-85 mm) were prospectively enrolled in 2 studies. Ten patients (mean age 70.3 years, range 48-83 years, 50% male) with target lesions and histologically confirmed MP resection were identified prospectively at the time of EMR, with 3 having full-thickness resection. All cases were identified intraprocedurally by a target sign on the underside of the specimen and a mirror target evident in the mucosal defect. All patients were treated endoscopically with 1 to 5 endoscopic clips. None required operative management. Thirteen inpatient days were required to treat the 10 patients (mean 1.3 days). LIMITATIONS: Nonrandomized study.
CONCLUSIONS: Careful analysis of the post-EMR specimen and resection defect may reveal a target sign, an easily recognized and reliable marker of either partial- or full-thickness MP resection and potential perforation. Prompt recognition of this sign facilitates endoscopic management.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21184872     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  26 in total

1.  Bleeding following wide-field endoscopic resection in the colon.

Authors:  Michael J Bourke
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2011-12

2.  Just Clip It: Endoscopic Clipping in the 21st Century.

Authors:  B Joseph Elmunzer
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Unexpected endoscopic full-thickness resection of a duodenal neuroendocrine tumor.

Authors:  Ken Hatogai; Yasuhiro Oono; Kuang-I Fu; Tomoyuki Odagaki; Hiroaki Ikematsu; Takashi Kojima; Tomonori Yano; Kazuhiro Kaneko
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Management of colonoscopic perforation: a systematic review and treatment algorithm.

Authors:  Khalid N Alsowaina; Mooyad A Ahmed; Nawar A Alkhamesi; Ahmad I Elnahas; Jeffrey D Hawel; Nitin V Khanna; Christopher M Schlachta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Selection of EMR and ESD for Laterally Spreading Lesions of the Colon.

Authors:  Ji Young Bang; Michael J Bourke
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-12

Review 6.  Routine and advanced polypectomy techniques.

Authors:  Prashant Kedia; Jerome D Waye
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2011-10

7.  Advances in colonoscopy.

Authors:  Nicholas Tutticci; Michael J Bourke
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06

8.  British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctologists of Great Britain and Ireland guidelines for the management of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Matthew D Rutter; Amit Chattree; Jamie A Barbour; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Pradeep Bhandari; Brian P Saunders; Andrew M Veitch; John Anderson; Bjorn J Rembacken; Maurice B Loughrey; Rupert Pullan; William V Garrett; Gethin Lewis; Sunil Dolwani
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 9.  The Use of the Overstitch to Close Endoscopic Resection Defects.

Authors:  Jennifer M Kolb; Hazem Hammad
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2019-10-16

Review 10.  Optimizing Resection of Large Colorectal Polyps.

Authors:  Steven J Heitman; David J Tate; Michael J Bourke
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.