Literature DB >> 21184867

Methodological issues in comparative effectiveness research: clinical trials.

Peter Peduzzi1, Tassos Kyriakides, Theresa Z O'Connor, Peter Guarino, Stuart R Warren, Grant D Huang.   

Abstract

The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Cooperative Studies Program has been conducting comparative effectiveness clinical trials for nearly 4 decades in many disease areas, including cardiovascular disease/surgery, diabetes mellitus, mental health, neurologic disorders, cancer, infectious diseases, and rheumatoid arthritis. The features that have made this program advantageous for conducting comparative effectiveness clinical trials are described along with methodological considerations for future trials based on lessons learned from its experience conducting these types of studies. Some of the lessons learned involve managing risk factors, clinical equipoise, patient preferences, evolving technology, the use of usual care as a comparator and pharmaceutical issues related to study drug blinding. These issues are not unique to the VA but can play an important role in enabling valid comparisons between treatments that may have differences in delivery or mechanisms of action and could affect the execution and feasibility of conducting a clinical trial with a comparative effectiveness aim. We also outline some future directions for comparative effectiveness clinical trials.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21184867     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  3 in total

1.  The Trials and Tribulations of Selecting Comparison Groups in Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacological Complementary and Integrative Health Interventions.

Authors:  Karen J Sherman
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 2.579

Review 2.  New methods for determining comparative effectiveness in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Huifeng Yun; Jeffrey R Curtis
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  Design and conduct of a provider survey to determine a clinically persuasive effect size in planning VA Cooperative Study #590 (Li+).

Authors:  Kelly M Harrington; Matthew H Liang; Keri Hannagan; Soe Soe Thwin; Ryan E Ferguson; Natalie Morgenstern; Erick Flores; Ira R Katz
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2016-08-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.