Literature DB >> 21184569

A review of the tissue residue approach for organic and organometallic compounds in aquatic organisms.

Anne E McElroy1, Mace G Barron, Nancy Beckvar, Susan B Kane Driscoll, James P Meador, Tom F Parkerton, Thomas G Preuss, Jeffery A Steevens.   

Abstract

This paper reviews the tissue residue approach (TRA) for toxicity assessment as it applies to organic chemicals and some organometallic compounds (Sn, Hg, and Pb) in aquatic organisms. Specific emphasis was placed on evaluating key factors that influence interpretation of critical body residue (CBR) toxicity metrics including data quality issues, lipid dynamics, choice of endpoints, processes that alter toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics, phototoxicity, species- and life stage-specific sensitivities, and biotransformation. The vast majority of data available on TRA is derived from laboratory studies of acute lethal responses to organic toxicants exhibiting baseline toxicity. Application of the TRA to various baseline toxicants as well as substances with specific modes of action via receptor-mediated processes, such as chlorinated aromatic hydrocarbons, pesticides, and organometallics is discussed, as is application of TRA concepts in field assessments of tissue residues. In contrast to media-based toxicity relationships, CBR values tend to be less variable and less influenced by factors that control bioavailability and bioaccumulation, and TRA can be used to infer mechanisms of toxic action, evaluate the toxicity of mixtures, and interpret field data on bioaccumulated toxicants. If residue-effects data are not available, body residues can be estimated, as has been done using the target lipid model for baseline toxicants, to derive critical values for risk assessment. One of the primary unresolved issues complicating TRA for organic chemicals is biotransformation. Further work on the influence of biotransformation, a better understanding of contaminant lipid interactions, and an explicit understanding of the time dependency of CBRs and receptor-mediated toxicity are all required to advance this field. Additional residue-effects data on sublethal endpoints, early life stages, and a wider range of legacy and emergent contaminants will be needed to improve the ability to use TRA for organic and organometallic compounds.
Copyright © 2010 SETAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21184569     DOI: 10.1002/ieam.132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag        ISSN: 1551-3777            Impact factor:   2.992


  8 in total

1.  A toxicokinetic model for thiamethoxam in rats: implications for higher-tier risk assessment.

Authors:  Agnieszka J Bednarska; Peter Edwards; Richard Sibly; Pernille Thorbek
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Direct and indirect effects of toxins on competition dynamics of species in an aquatic environment.

Authors:  Chunhua Shan; Qihua Huang
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Tissue-based environmental quality benchmarks and standards.

Authors:  James P Meador; Michael St J Warne; Peter M Chapman; King Ming Chan; Shen Yu; Kenneth M Y Leung
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Future needs and recommendations in the development of species sensitivity distributions: Estimating toxicity thresholds for aquatic ecological communities and assessing impacts of chemical exposures.

Authors:  Scott Belanger; Mace Barron; Peter Craig; Scott Dyer; Malyka Galay-Burgos; Mick Hamer; Stuart Marshall; Leo Posthuma; Sandy Raimondo; Paul Whitehouse
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 2.992

5.  Toxicokinetics of metals in terrestrial invertebrates: making things straight with the one-compartment principle.

Authors:  Boris Skip; Agnieszka J Bednarska; Ryszard Laskowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Ecological Thresholds of Toxicological Concern: A Review.

Authors:  Mace G Barron; Ryan R Otter; Kristin A Connors; Aude Kienzler; Michelle R Embry
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2021-03-05

7.  Interlaboratory Comparison of Three Sediment Bioaccumulation Tests.

Authors:  Guilherme R Lotufo; James M Biedenbach; J Daniel Farrar; Michael K Chanov; Brian W Hester; C Ryan Warbritton; Jeffery A Steevens; Jenifer M Netchaev; Anthony J Bednar; David W Moore
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 4.218

8.  Effect of cadmium bioavailability in food on its compartmentalisation in carabids.

Authors:  Agnieszka J Bednarska; Zuzanna M Świątek; Karolina Paciorek; Natalia Kubińska
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 2.823

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.