OBJECTIVE: Intense emotions are known triggers of sudden cardiac death. However, the effect of typical daily emotion on repolarization has not been examined. We examined whether QT interval changes as a function of typical daily emotion in patients at risk for cardiac events in the context of emotion. METHODS: We studied 161 patients (n = 114 females; mean age, 35 years) with the congenital form of the Long QT Syndrome during daily activities. Each day for 3 days, a 12-hour Holter recording was completed. Patients were paged ten times per day at random times and rated the intensity of 16 prespecified emotions during the preceding 5 minutes. Measurements of QT interval and interbeat intervals were synchronized with emotion ratings. RESULTS: Low Arousal Positive Affect was associated with significant increases in QT interval corrected for heart rate (using Fridericia's QTc) (p < .001), whereas higher arousal Activated Positive Affect (p < .001) and Activated Negative Affect (p < .01) were associated with significant decreases in QTc. Changes in QTc as a function of daily emotion ranged from 5-ms increases to 11-ms decreases. High-frequency heart rate variability (vagal tone) was positively correlated with QTc (p < .001). The effects of each positive emotion variable on QTc were greater in LQT2 than LQT1 patients (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Ventricular repolarization duration (QTc) changes dynamically as a function of daily emotion. These changes are relatively small and do not constitute a risk in themselves. In the context of other risk factors, however, they may contribute to ventricular arrhythmias in vulnerable populations.
OBJECTIVE: Intense emotions are known triggers of sudden cardiac death. However, the effect of typical daily emotion on repolarization has not been examined. We examined whether QT interval changes as a function of typical daily emotion in patients at risk for cardiac events in the context of emotion. METHODS: We studied 161 patients (n = 114 females; mean age, 35 years) with the congenital form of the Long QT Syndrome during daily activities. Each day for 3 days, a 12-hour Holter recording was completed. Patients were paged ten times per day at random times and rated the intensity of 16 prespecified emotions during the preceding 5 minutes. Measurements of QT interval and interbeat intervals were synchronized with emotion ratings. RESULTS: Low Arousal Positive Affect was associated with significant increases in QT interval corrected for heart rate (using Fridericia's QTc) (p < .001), whereas higher arousal Activated Positive Affect (p < .001) and Activated Negative Affect (p < .01) were associated with significant decreases in QTc. Changes in QTc as a function of daily emotion ranged from 5-ms increases to 11-ms decreases. High-frequency heart rate variability (vagal tone) was positively correlated with QTc (p < .001). The effects of each positive emotion variable on QTc were greater in LQT2 than LQT1patients (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Ventricular repolarization duration (QTc) changes dynamically as a function of daily emotion. These changes are relatively small and do not constitute a risk in themselves. In the context of other risk factors, however, they may contribute to ventricular arrhythmias in vulnerable populations.
Authors: P M Spooner; C Albert; E J Benjamin; R Boineau; R C Elston; A L George; X Jouven; L H Kuller; J W MacCluer; E Marbán; J E Muller; P J Schwartz; D S Siscovick; R P Tracy; W Zareba; D P Zipes Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-05-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: A J Moss; J L Robinson; L Gessman; R Gillespie; W Zareba; P J Schwartz; G M Vincent; J Benhorin; E L Heilbron; J A Towbin; S G Priori; C Napolitano; L Zhang; A Medina; M L Andrews; K Timothy Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1999-10-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: P J Schwartz; S G Priori; C Spazzolini; A J Moss; G M Vincent; C Napolitano; I Denjoy; P Guicheney; G Breithardt; M T Keating; J A Towbin; A H Beggs; P Brink; A A Wilde; L Toivonen; W Zareba; J L Robinson; K W Timothy; V Corfield; D Wattanasirichaigoon; C Corbett; W Haverkamp; E Schulze-Bahr; M H Lehmann; K Schwartz; P Coumel; R Bloise Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-01-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: M Pagani; G Mazzuero; A Ferrari; D Liberati; S Cerutti; D Vaitl; L Tavazzi; A Malliani Journal: Circulation Date: 1991-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: William Whang; Howard M Julien; Laura Higginbotham; Ana V Soto; Nisha Broodie; J Thomas Bigger; Hasan Garan; Matthew M Burg; Karina W Davidson Journal: Europace Date: 2011-07-27 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Richard D Lane; Harry T Reis; Chiu-Hsieh Hsu; Karl B Kern; Jean Philippe Couderc; Arthur J Moss; Wojciech Zareba Journal: Am J Med Date: 2018-01-05 Impact factor: 5.928
Authors: Nicholas Child; Ben Hanson; Martin Bishop; Christopher A Rinaldi; Julian Bostock; David Western; Michael Cooklin; Mark O'Neil; Matthew Wright; Reza Razavi; Jaswinder Gill; Peter Taggart Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2014-05-15
Authors: Sahib S Khalsa; Leila Shahabi; Olujimi A Ajijola; Alexander Bystritsky; Bruce D Naliboff; Kalyanam Shivkumar Journal: Front Integr Neurosci Date: 2014-01-02