Literature DB >> 21183299

An analytical evaluation of eight on-site oral fluid drug screening devices using laboratory confirmation results from oral fluid.

Tom Blencowe1, Anna Pehrsson, Pirjo Lillsunde, Kari Vimpari, Sjoerd Houwing, Beitske Smink, René Mathijssen, Trudy Van der Linden, Sara-Ann Legrand, Kristof Pil, Alain Verstraete.   

Abstract

The performance of eight on-site oral fluid drug screening devices was studied in Belgium, Finland and the Netherlands as a part of the EU-project DRUID. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the reliability of the devices for testing drivers suspected of driving under the influence of drugs (DUID). The performance of the devices was assessed by their ability to detect substances using cut-offs which were set at sufficiently low levels to allow optimal detection of positive DUID cases. The devices were evaluated for the detection of amphetamine(s), cannabis, cocaine, opiates and benzodiazepines when the relevant test was incorporated. Methamphetamine, MDMA and PCP tests that were included in some devices were not evaluated since there were too few positive samples. The device results were compared with confirmation analysis results in oral fluid. The opiates tests appeared to perform relatively well with sensitivity results between 69 and 90%. Amphetamines and benzodiazepines tests had lower sensitivity, although the DrugWipe test evaluated was promising for amphetamine. In particular, it is evident that the cannabis and cocaine tests of the devices still lack sensitivity, although further testing of the cocaine tests is desirable due to the low prevalence and low concentrations encountered in this study.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21183299     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.11.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  12 in total

1.  Cannabinoid disposition in oral fluid after controlled smoked, vaporized, and oral cannabis administration.

Authors:  Madeleine J Swortwood; Matthew N Newmeyer; Maria Andersson; Osama A Abulseoud; Karl B Scheidweiler; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Drug Test Anal       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.345

2.  Orally administered cannabidiol does not produce false-positive tests for Δ9 -tetrahydrocannabinol on the Securetec DrugWipe® 5S or Dräger DrugTest® 5000.

Authors:  Danielle McCartney; Richard C Kevin; Anastasia S Suraev; Christopher Irwin; Ronald R Grunstein; Camilla M Hoyos; Iain S McGregor
Journal:  Drug Test Anal       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 3.234

3.  On-site test for cannabinoids in oral fluid.

Authors:  Nathalie A Desrosiers; Dayong Lee; David M Schwope; Garry Milman; Allan J Barnes; David A Gorelick; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 4.  Current knowledge on cannabinoids in oral fluid.

Authors:  Dayong Lee; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Drug Test Anal       Date:  2013-08-25       Impact factor: 3.345

5.  Concordance of self-reported drug use and saliva drug tests in a sample of emergency department patients.

Authors:  Scott Macdonald; Cheryl J Cherpitel; Tim Stockwell; Gina Martin; Sonya Ishiguro; Kate Vallance; Jeff Brubacher
Journal:  J Subst Use       Date:  2014-03-01

6.  Cannabinoids in oral fluid by on-site immunoassay and by GC-MS using two different oral fluid collection devices.

Authors:  Nathalie A Desrosiers; Garry Milman; Damodara R Mendu; Dayong Lee; Allan J Barnes; David A Gorelick; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 7.  Correlation between Blood and Oral Fluid Psychoactive Drug Concentrations and Cognitive Impairment in Driving under the Influence of Drugs.

Authors:  Francesco Paolo Busardo; Simona Pichini; Manuela Pellegrini; Angelo Montana; Alfredo Fabrizio Lo Faro; Simona Zaami; Silvia Graziano
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 7.363

8.  Prevalence of drug use among drivers based on mandatory, random tests in a roadside survey.

Authors:  Manuela Alcañiz; Montserrat Guillen; Miguel Santolino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Detection of Δ9 THC in oral fluid following vaporized cannabis with varied cannabidiol (CBD) content: An evaluation of two point-of-collection testing devices.

Authors:  Thomas R Arkell; Richard C Kevin; Jordyn Stuart; Nicholas Lintzeris; Paul S Haber; Johannes G Ramaekers; Iain S McGregor
Journal:  Drug Test Anal       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 3.345

10.  A Study on the Reliability of an On-Site Oral Fluid Drug Test in a Recreational Context.

Authors:  Stefano Gentili; Renata Solimini; Roberta Tittarelli; Giulio Mannocchi; Francesco Paolo Busardò
Journal:  J Anal Methods Chem       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.193

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.