Literature DB >> 21183164

Effects of HUD-supported lead hazard control interventions in housing on children's blood lead.

Scott Clark1, Warren Galke, Paul Succop, Joann Grote, Pat McLaine, Jonathan Wilson, Sherry Dixon, William Menrath, Sandy Roda, Mei Chen, Robert Bornschein, David Jacobs.   

Abstract

The Evaluation of the US Department of Housing and Urban Development Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control Grant Program studied the effectiveness of the housing intervention performed in reducing the blood lead of children at four post-intervention times (6-months, 1-year, 2-years, and 3-years). A repeat measures analysis showed that blood lead levels declined up to three-years post-intervention. The results at each successive collection time were significantly lower than at the previous post-intervention time except for the difference between the levels at two and three years. At two-years post-intervention, geometric mean blood lead levels were approximately 37% lower than at pre-intervention. Children with pre-intervention blood lead levels as low as 10 μg/dL experienced substantial declines in blood lead levels. Previous studies have found substantial improvements only if a child's pre-intervention blood lead level was above 20 μg/dL. Individual interior lead hazard control treatments as grouped by Interior Strategy were not a significant predictor of post-intervention blood lead levels. However, children living in dwellings where exterior lead hazard control interventions were done had lower blood lead levels at one-year post-intervention than those living in dwellings without the exterior interventions (all other factors being equal), but those differences were only significant when the mean exterior paint lead loading at pre-intervention was about the 90th percentile (7.0mg/cm(2)). This observation suggests that exterior lead hazard control can be an important component of a lead hazard control plan. Children who were six to eleven months of age at pre-intervention had a significant increase in blood lead at one-year post-intervention, probably due to other exposures.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21183164     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2010.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  4 in total

Review 1.  Effects of prenatal exposure to endocrine disruptors and toxic metals on the fetal epigenome.

Authors:  Paige A Bommarito; Elizabeth Martin; Rebecca C Fry
Journal:  Epigenomics       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.778

2.  Calls for removing all lead paint from US housing are misguided.

Authors:  Don Ryan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Persistent organic pollutants in dust from older homes: learning from lead.

Authors:  Todd P Whitehead; Catherine Metayer; Mary H Ward; Joanne S Colt; Robert B Gunier; Nicole C Deziel; Stephen M Rappaport; Patricia A Buffler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Assessing the effect of four types of direct mail messages to promote the uptake of residential lead remediation funds.

Authors:  H Okatch; B Nkala; J Beltrami; E Poy; D Parmer; J Nkala; F Olawole
Journal:  Public Health Pract (Oxf)       Date:  2022-09-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.