Peter S Hersh1, Steven A Greenstein, Kristen L Fry. 1. Cornea and Laser Eye Institute-Hersh Vision Group, CLEI Center for Keratoconus, Teaneck, New Jersey 07666, USA. phersh@vision-institute.com
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate 1-year outcomes of corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) for treatment of keratoconus and corneal ectasia. SETTING: Cornea and refractive surgery subspecialty practice. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. METHODS: Collagen crosslinking was performed in eyes with keratoconus or ectasia. The treatment group received standard CXL and the sham control group received riboflavin alone. Principal outcomes included uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, refraction, astigmatism, and topography-derived outcomes of maximum and average keratometry (K) value. RESULTS: The UDVA improved significantly from 0.84 logMAR ± 0.34 (SD) (20/137) to 0.77 ± 0.37 logMAR (20/117) (P = .04) and the CDVA, from 0.35 ± 0.24 logMAR (20/45) to 0.23 ± 0.21 logMAR (20/34) (P<.001). Fifteen patients (21.1%) gained and 1 patient lost (1.4%) 2 or more Snellen lines of CDVA. The maximum K value decreased from baseline by 1.7 ± 3.9 diopters (D) (P<.001), 2.0 ± 4.4 D (P = .002), and 1.0 ± 2.5 D (P = .08) in the entire cohort, keratoconus subgroup, and ectasia subgroup, respectively. The maximum K value decreased by 2.0 D or more in 22 patients (31.0%) and increased by 2.0 D or more in 3 patients (4.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Collagen crosslinking was effective in improving UDVA, CDVA, the maximum K value, and the average K value. Keratoconus patients had more improvement in topographic measurements than patients with ectasia. Both CDVA and maximum K value worsened between baseline and 1 month, followed by improvement between 1, 3, and 6 months and stabilization thereafter. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Additional disclosure is found in the footnotes.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To evaluate 1-year outcomes of corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) for treatment of keratoconus and corneal ectasia. SETTING: Cornea and refractive surgery subspecialty practice. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. METHODS: Collagen crosslinking was performed in eyes with keratoconus or ectasia. The treatment group received standard CXL and the sham control group received riboflavin alone. Principal outcomes included uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, refraction, astigmatism, and topography-derived outcomes of maximum and average keratometry (K) value. RESULTS: The UDVA improved significantly from 0.84 logMAR ± 0.34 (SD) (20/137) to 0.77 ± 0.37 logMAR (20/117) (P = .04) and the CDVA, from 0.35 ± 0.24 logMAR (20/45) to 0.23 ± 0.21 logMAR (20/34) (P<.001). Fifteen patients (21.1%) gained and 1 patient lost (1.4%) 2 or more Snellen lines of CDVA. The maximum K value decreased from baseline by 1.7 ± 3.9 diopters (D) (P<.001), 2.0 ± 4.4 D (P = .002), and 1.0 ± 2.5 D (P = .08) in the entire cohort, keratoconus subgroup, and ectasia subgroup, respectively. The maximum K value decreased by 2.0 D or more in 22 patients (31.0%) and increased by 2.0 D or more in 3 patients (4.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Collagen crosslinking was effective in improving UDVA, CDVA, the maximum K value, and the average K value. Keratoconuspatients had more improvement in topographic measurements than patients with ectasia. Both CDVA and maximum K value worsened between baseline and 1 month, followed by improvement between 1, 3, and 6 months and stabilization thereafter. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Additional disclosure is found in the footnotes.
Authors: Jay M Stewart; On-Tat Lee; Fergus F Wong; David S Schultz; Ricardo Lamy Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-11-29 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: N Venkatesh Prajna; Naveen Radhakrishnan; Prajna Lalitha; Ariana Austin; Kathryn J Ray; Jeremy D Keenan; Travis C Porco; Thomas M Lietman; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2019-09-04 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Robert P L Wisse; Rob W P Simons; Martijn J B van der Vossen; Marc B Muijzer; Nienke Soeters; Rudy M M A Nuijts; Daniel A Godefrooij Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 7.389