Literature DB >> 21182941

Relationship between the size of nanoparticles and their adjuvant activity: data from a study with an improved experimental design.

Xinran Li1, Brian R Sloat, Nijaporn Yanasarn, Zhengrong Cui.   

Abstract

There is a growing interest in identifying the relationship between the size of nanoparticles and their adjuvant activity, but the results from recent studies remain controversial. To address the controversy, it was thought that one should pay attention to the nanoparticle formulations to make sure that the antigen-loaded nanoparticles to be compared are not only different in particle size, but more importantly, as identical to each other as possible in all other formulation properties. In the present study, using ovalbumin (OVA) as a model antigen conjugated onto nanoparticles engineered from lecithin/glyceryl monostearate-in-water emulsions, we prepared OVA-nanoparticles of 230 nm and 708 nm. Before evaluating the immune responses induced by them in a mouse model, we made sure that: (i) the sizes of the two OVA-nanoparticles did not extensively overlap, (ii) the nanoparticles have similar zeta potentials and comparable antigen-loading, and (iii) the nanoparticles did not aggregate when suspended in simulated biological media. We then showed that when subcutaneously injected into mice, the 230 nm OVA-conjugated nanoparticles induced stronger OVA-specific antibody and cellular immune responses than the 708 nm OVA-nanoparticles. Future studies attempting to correlate the size of nanoparticles and their adjuvant activities need to consider formulation parameters to ensure that the particles are different only in size and are stable before and after injection.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21182941      PMCID: PMC3065961          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.12.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm        ISSN: 0939-6411            Impact factor:   5.571


  32 in total

1.  Size dependent immune response after subcutaneous, oral and intranasal administration of BSA loaded nanospheres.

Authors:  I Gutierro; R M Hernández; M Igartua; A R Gascón; J L Pedraz
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2002-11-22       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Immunostimulation mechanism of LPD nanoparticle as a vaccine carrier.

Authors:  Zhengrong Cui; Su-Ji Han; Dileep Padinjarae Vangasseri; Leaf Huang
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Particle size and surface charge affect particle uptake by human dendritic cells in an in vitro model.

Authors:  Camilla Foged; Birger Brodin; Sven Frokjaer; Anne Sundblad
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2005-07-25       Impact factor: 5.875

4.  Methods for nano-particle based vaccine formulation and evaluation of their immunogenicity.

Authors:  Martha Kalkanidis; Geoffrey A Pietersz; Sue D Xiang; Patricia L Mottram; Blessing Crimeen-Irwin; Katie Ardipradja; Magdalena Plebanski
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.608

5.  Interactions of antigen-loaded polylactide particles with macrophages and their correlation with the immune response.

Authors:  Vibhu Kanchan; Amulya K Panda
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Type 1 and 2 immunity following vaccination is influenced by nanoparticle size: formulation of a model vaccine for respiratory syncytial virus.

Authors:  Patricia L Mottram; David Leong; Blessing Crimeen-Irwin; Simone Gloster; Sue D Xiang; Jayesh Meanger; Reena Ghildyal; Nicholas Vardaxis; Magdalena Plebanski
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Synthetic double-stranded RNA poly(I:C) as a potent peptide vaccine adjuvant: therapeutic activity against human cervical cancer in a rodent model.

Authors:  Zhengrong Cui; Fu Qiu
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2005-12-16       Impact factor: 6.968

8.  Nanoparticles target distinct dendritic cell populations according to their size.

Authors:  Vania Manolova; Anna Flace; Monika Bauer; Katrin Schwarz; Philippe Saudan; Martin F Bachmann
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.532

9.  A practical approach to the use of nanoparticles for vaccine delivery.

Authors:  Janet Wendorf; Manmohan Singh; James Chesko; Jina Kazzaz; Elawati Soewanan; Mildred Ugozzoli; Derek O'Hagan
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.534

10.  Polyphosphazene polyelectrolytes: a link between the formation of noncovalent complexes with antigenic proteins and immunostimulating activity.

Authors:  Alexander K Andrianov; Alexander Marin; Bryan E Roberts
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.988

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Key roles of adjuvants in modern vaccines.

Authors:  Steven G Reed; Mark T Orr; Christopher B Fox
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 2.  Multifunctional nanoparticles for cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Tayebeh Saleh; Seyed Abbas Shojaosadati
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Applications of nanomaterials as vaccine adjuvants.

Authors:  Motao Zhu; Rongfu Wang; Guangjun Nie
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Improving cancer immunotherapy using nanomedicines: progress, opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  John D Martin; Horacio Cabral; Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Critical Size Limit of Biodegradable Nanoparticles for Enhanced Lymph Node Trafficking and Paracortex Penetration.

Authors:  Gregory P Howard; Garima Verma; Xiyu Ke; Winter M Thayer; Timothy Hamerly; Victoria K Baxter; John E Lee; Rhoel R Dinglasan; Hai-Quan Mao
Journal:  Nano Res       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 8.897

6.  Aluminum hydroxide nanoparticles show a stronger vaccine adjuvant activity than traditional aluminum hydroxide microparticles.

Authors:  Xinran Li; Abdulaziz M Aldayel; Zhengrong Cui
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 9.776

7.  Permeation of antigen protein-conjugated nanoparticles and live bacteria through microneedle-treated mouse skin.

Authors:  Amit Kumar; Xinran Li; Michael A Sandoval; B Leticia Rodriguez; Brian R Sloat; Zhengrong Cui
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2011-06-21

Review 8.  Using PAMPs and DAMPs as adjuvants in cancer vaccines.

Authors:  Huanyou Sun; Wenwen Hu; Yinan Yan; Zichun Zhang; Yuxin Chen; Xuefan Yao; Ling Teng; Xinyuan Wang; Dafei Chai; Junnian Zheng; Gang Wang
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 4.526

Review 9.  Plant Viruses as Nanoparticle-Based Vaccines and Adjuvants.

Authors:  Marie-Ève Lebel; Karine Chartrand; Denis Leclerc; Alain Lamarre
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2015-08-05

10.  A single-dose PLGA encapsulated protective antigen domain 4 nanoformulation protects mice against Bacillus anthracis spore challenge.

Authors:  Manish Manish; Amit Rahi; Manpreet Kaur; Rakesh Bhatnagar; Samer Singh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.