Literature DB >> 21182849

Parametric modulation of error-related ERP components by the magnitude of visuo-motor mismatch.

Roland Vocat1, Gilles Pourtois, Patrik Vuilleumier.   

Abstract

Errors generate typical brain responses, characterized by two successive event-related potentials (ERP) following incorrect action: the error-related negativity (ERN) and the positivity error (Pe). However, it is unclear whether these error-related responses are sensitive to the magnitude of the error, or instead show all-or-none effects. We studied error-monitoring with ERPs while healthy adult participants performed ballistic pointing movements towards a visual target with or without optical prisms, in alternating runs. This allowed us to record variable pointing errors, ranging from slight to large deviations relative to the visual target. Behavioural results demonstrated a classic effect of prisms on pointing (i.e. initial shifts away from targets, with rapidly improving performance), as well as robust prismatic after-effects (i.e. deviations in the opposite direction when removing the prisms after successful adaptation). Critically, the amplitude of both ERN and Pe were strongly influenced by the magnitude of errors. Error-related ERPs were observed for large deviations, but their amplitudes decreased monotonically when pointing accuracy increased, revealing a parametric modulation of monitoring systems as a function of the severity of errors. These results indicate that early error detection mechanisms do not represent failures in an all-or-none manner, but rather encode the degree of mismatch between the actual and expected motor outcome, providing a flexible cognitive control process that can discriminate between different degrees of mismatch between intentions and outcomes.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21182849     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  9 in total

1.  Brain negativity as an indicator of predictive error processing: the contribution of visual action effect monitoring.

Authors:  Michael Joch; Mathias Hegele; Heiko Maurer; Hermann Müller; Lisa Katharina Maurer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Does the processing of sensory and reward-prediction errors involve common neural resources? Evidence from a frontocentral negative potential modulated by movement execution errors.

Authors:  Flavie Torrecillos; Philippe Albouy; Thomas Brochier; Nicole Malfait
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Using brain potentials to understand prism adaptation: the error-related negativity and the P300.

Authors:  Stephane J MacLean; Cameron D Hassall; Yoko Ishigami; Olav E Krigolson; Gail A Eskes
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  EEG Theta Dynamics within Frontal and Parietal Cortices for Error Processing during Reaching Movements in a Prism Adaptation Study Altering Visuo-Motor Predictive Planning.

Authors:  Pieranna Arrighi; Luca Bonfiglio; Fabrizio Minichilli; Nicoletta Cantore; Maria Chiara Carboncini; Emily Piccotti; Bruno Rossi; Paolo Andre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Visual Feedback Modulates Aftereffects and Electrophysiological Markers of Prism Adaptation.

Authors:  Jasmine R Aziz; Stephane J MacLean; Olave E Krigolson; Gail A Eskes
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Focused Review on Neural Correlates of Different Types of Motor Errors and Related Terminological Issues.

Authors:  Lisa Katharina Maurer; Michael Joch; Mathias Hegele; Hermann Müller
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 2.193

7.  Action Monitoring Cortical Activity Coupled to Submovements.

Authors:  Michael Pereira; Aleksander Sobolewski; José Del R Millán
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-10-24

8.  The Effect of Static and Dynamic Visual Stimulations on Error Detection Based on Error-Evoked Brain Responses.

Authors:  Rui Xu; Yaoyao Wang; Xianle Shi; Ningning Wang; Dong Ming
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Can Stephen Curry really know?-Conscious access to outcome prediction of motor actions.

Authors:  Lisa Katharina Maurer; Heiko Maurer; Mathias Hegele; Hermann Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.