Literature DB >> 21182429

Pharmacokinetic features of difluprednate ophthalmic emulsion in rabbits as determined by glucocorticoid receptor-binding bioassay.

Tetsuya Tajika1, Mitsunori Waki, Masakatsu Tsuzuki, Tetsuo Kida, Hideyuki Sakaki.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Difluprednate (6α,9-difluoro-11β,17,21-trihydroxy-1,4-pregnadiene-3,20-dione 21-acetate 17-butyrate, DFBA) has long been used as an anti-inflammatory dermatological agent. The main objectives of the current study were to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic features of DFBA when used as an ophthalmic agent, and to compare these features with those of other common ophthalmic agents, to determine which has the highest activity.
METHODS: A glucocorticoid (GC) receptor-binding test was performed to evaluate GC receptor-binding activity (GCRBA, the index of pharmacological effect). Using this information, we calculated dose-response curves, IC(50) values, and K(d) values to evaluate each drug's K(i) value. Finally, we performed studies in live rabbits to compare the activity of 4 formulations [0.002%, 0.01%, or 0.05% DFBA, or an ophthalmic solution of 0.1% betamethasone sodium phosphate (BMP)] at 4 time points (0.5, 1, 2, 4  h). At each time point, blood and eye samples were taken so that C(max) (the maximum equivalent concentration of the active DFBA metabolite, DFB), T(max) (the time at which C(max) was measured), and the area under the concentration-time curve could be compared across the 4 formulations.
RESULTS: BMP had the highest K(i) value (8.4 × 10(-8) nmol/L), whereas DFB had the lowest (6.1 × 10(-11) nmol/L). The GCRBA of DFBA was intermediate to these 2 values (7.8 × 10(-10) nmol/L). Instillation of the DFBA ophthalmic emulsion in the eyes of rabbits led to dose-dependent increases in GCRBA, which was mostly attributable to the activity of DFB. The 0.05% DFBA ophthalmic emulsion elicited the greatest response in both aqueous humor and iris/ciliary body tissues, though there were no significant dose-dependent differences in GCRBA in plasma samples.
CONCLUSIONS: The 0.05% DFBA ophthalmic emulsion appears to be an effective and safe anti-inflammatory treatment in ocular tissues. It is comparable, and possibly even superior, to the 0.1% BMP solution, and may be particularly useful in cases of severe disease where treatment with BMP solution alone is insufficient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21182429     DOI: 10.1089/jop.2010.0106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ocul Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 1080-7683            Impact factor:   2.671


  7 in total

1.  Difluprednate 0.05% versus prednisolone acetate 1% for endogenous anterior uveitis: a phase III, multicenter, randomized study.

Authors:  John D Sheppard; Melissa M Toyos; John H Kempen; Paramjit Kaur; C Stephen Foster
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Risk of Elevated Intraocular Pressure With Difluprednate in Patients With Non-Infectious Uveitis.

Authors:  Mehmet Yakin; Aman Kumar; Shilpa Kodati; Leslie Jones; H Nida Sen
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 5.488

3.  Difluprednate for the prevention of ocular inflammation postsurgery: an update.

Authors:  Eric D Donnenfeld
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-06-15

4.  Spectral domain optical coherence tomography documented rapid resolution of pseudophakic cystoid macular edema with topical difluprednate.

Authors:  Kv Chalam; Vijay Khetpal; Chirag J Patel
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-24

5.  A retrospective analysis of intraocular pressure changes after cataract surgery with the use of prednisolone acetate 1% versus difluprednate 0.05%.

Authors:  Yael Kusne; Paul Kang; Robert E Fintelmann
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-23

6.  Bioavailability of generic 0.05% difluprednate emulsion in the aqueous humor, cornea, and conjunctiva of New Zealand rabbits after a single dose compared with commercial difluprednate.

Authors:  Arieh Mercado-Sesma; Angélica Contreras-Rubio; Leopoldo Baiza-Durán; Oscar Olvera-Montaño; Mónica Miranda-Robles; José Bonilla-García
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect       Date:  2017-03-21

Review 7.  Update in treatment of uveitic macular edema.

Authors:  Spyridon Koronis; Panagiotis Stavrakas; Miltiadis Balidis; Nikolaos Kozeis; Paris G Tranos
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 4.162

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.